Ruby Barker • BAGHEAD

Ruby Barker Baghead

Ruby Barker is a British actor best known for playing Marina in the Netflix show Bridgerton. Now, she has made the leap to the big screen with a key role in the new horror Baghead. Ruby took some time to talk to us about her new film, her favourite horrors and what scares her.

STARBURST: How would you describe your character and role in Baghead?

Ruby Barker: So, I play the role of Katie who is Iris’s, played by Freya Allan, best mate. We’ve known each other for years, and they have a sisterly bond. Katie is the voice of sanity, the voice of reason. She’s correct, and on it. Got good acumen and is hard-working. And she cuts through the nonsense. She’s basically the audience.

When you received the script, what was particularly interesting about it for you?

It’s written really well, and I loved the premise. It was originally a short film, and I love the idea that there are a set of circumstances that are hella creepy, that you can bring back the dead for a couple of minutes. But at what cost? It’s really fascinating as it’s something we’ve all thought about, and if you haven’t yet then you surely will at some point in your life. Because grief is something we’re all going to experience. It’s something that unites everybody. So, yeah, it’s a cool idea with cool creatives behind it.

The location is important with Baghead; did that feed into your performance?

Yeah, it was really creepy. There was some stuff in a studio but a lot on location. I love being on location and it was beautiful. It was like a castle, and it was so creepy, it was perfect. There was this beautiful garden, and it was autumn which is one of my favourite seasons. It was nice to go into this dark, creepy set and then come outside to just the cleanest air and beautiful scenery. Just to be able to sit out and talk to people. It was a lovely environment to work in.

How would you describe what Baghead is?

So, what is Baghead? The ambiguity surrounding Baghead is kind of what makes it so scary. On paper, she’s a witch. She’s of the supernatural world. And supernatural horror is really scary. In life, we don’t fully understand things or why we’re here. Lots of science is disproven. Some people are really spiritual, and some people aren’t. But when you go into the supernatural, and spirituality, there aren’t any rules. What is possible here? That’s creepy and really scary. And Baghead is just really scary. The costume alone is really scary.

You mention the supernatural there; are you a horror fan?

I do like horror, but I can’t really do it alone. I get really scared. Even as a kid I couldn’t watch scary movies. Even Jurassic Park, that was scary to me. I think it’s because I get really into it, and I’ve got a big imagination. I do watch it, but I’m traumatised after. I’m a screamer and a jumper! Let me think of my favourites. Alien, I mean, what on Earth? And REC.? Lord have mercy! And it’s always best to see horror when you don’t know what to expect.

How do you choose your roles? Do you seek out horror?

I’m seldom asked to play the voice of reason. But how do you choose? Is the script really good? Who’s behind it? What other actors are involved? That all helps me choose. Freya had attached before I had, and when I heard I jumped at it. She was a real reason. I wanted to work with her and held her high up in my estimations. Peter Mullan, Ned Dennehy, Saffron Burrows – she’s really cool.

How have you found the transition from television to film?

They’re both very different experiences but I like them both. Bridgerton was shot over something like seven months, you spend a long time in the job. Whereas film is shorter; we shot Baghead in six weeks. It’s really intense for this short period of time. It can be easier to take television for granted but that’s not the case with film. It really is going to end soon.

Exclusive Interview: Director Nikolaj Arcel on THE PROMISED LAND

To celebrate the UK release of the epic Nordic western The Promised Land, we caught up with the film’s BAFTA-nominated writer and director Nikolaj Arcel (The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) about the making of his latest, critically acclaimed film.

In 1755, the impoverished Captain Ludvig Kahlen sets out to conquer the uninhabitable Danish heath in the name of the King. But the sole ruler of the area, the merciless Frederik de Schinkel, who believes the land belongs to him, swears revenge when the maid Ann Barbara and her serf husband escape for refuge with Kahlen.

As a filmmaker, Arcel has reunited after a decade with actor Mads Mikkelsen (The Hunt, Another Round), headlining a strong supporting cast including Amanda Collin (Raised by Wolves), Simon Bennebjerg (Borgen), Kristine Kujath Thorp (Sick of Myself) and Gustav Lindh (The Northman). Arcel tells us more about this new historical epic.

STARBURST: After working with Mads Mikkelsen on A Royal Affair, The Promised Land takes us back into the world of the period epic. Was this a conscious return to a genre you enjoy?

Nikolaj Arcel: I’ve always loved the scope of epic films, but this time around, I didn’t want to return to a certain period so much as I fell in love with the characters in the source novel, “The Captain and Ann Barbara” by Ida Jessen. The characters being so powerful is what truly inspired me to make this film. It was also the perfect opportunity to work with Mads again. We’ve been looking for a new project to collaborate on and couldn’t find one that suited us, but this was the right film at the right time.

Was working with Mads on The Promised Land different this time around?

It was kind of the same, actually! Mads and I have even discussed this, and we agree it felt like getting back on the bike. I never knew Mads before making A Royal Affair, but we became friends through that experience. We’ve seen each other many times since but, remember, his career really took off after that and he’s done so many huge films. Yet at the same time, none of us changed or became divas! I’d say the only thing that significantly changed was our experience. We’re a bit older now, and we wanted to exceed what we’ve done before by doing something better and more nuanced. I think we wanted to go a step further in terms of storytelling and saying something about human nature.

Did Mads encourage this from you as well?

Yes, he always encourages me to push things further. For The Promised Land, he was always adamant, and rightly so, that we should be bold in the choices our main character makes. It’s not about being heroic or looking good, it’s about doing things that are true to his nature.

credit: Henrik Ohsten

As a writer and director, do you welcome improvisation from your actors, or do you prefer they closely follow the script?

As a writer, I obviously prefer if they say what I’ve written! [laughs] However, I’m very open to input and changes from actors. In fact, I’m even happy to remove words. The more words you can remove, the better it usually becomes. You can say so much with facial expressions and visuals, so removing dialogue is fine. Look at Mads, he can convey so much without any words. On the other side of it, I would probably avoid adding much dialogue. In fact, for a film set in the 1750s, it’s quite hard to get the tone of the language right, so you can’t really improvise on a film like this.

Apart from being a historical drama, the film has been described as a ‘Nordic western’. Did you have any ambition to reinvent a classic formula?

No, we didn’t. I mean, we did look at certain westerns for inspiration around the visuals because there is a western element. But for me, it was always a historical epic because it takes place on the heath, but also in the grand manors with the wigs and fancy parties!

You directed the big-screen adaptation of The Dark Tower, which had Wild West influences, too…

Well, lets not forget that Stephen King’s novels are actually westerns! One of the many things that was tough about making that film was the first dictate from the studio telling us “don’t make it a western because nobody wants to watch a western” [Laughs]. Then perhaps it became a case of trying too hard ‘not’ to make it a western! But look, I love certain westerns like The Searchers and Unforgiven, however I’d say there are genres I have a greater affinity for. So, there was a western-inspired visual influence on The Promised Land, but it’s not a genre we set out to recreate.

Looking back at another of your earlier works, the original The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo became a huge international phenomenon and spawned the Hollywood remake. Did you get a sense of what it would become, back when you were adapting the book and writing the original screenplay?

I had no idea! While we were working on the script, the book was only just becoming popular. Only after I saw the final film in the editing room did I think, “Wow, this could be something special”. I think a big part of that is down to Noomi Rapace; her performance and the way she totally became Lisbeth Salander is incredible. But I had no idea how big it would become and, truthfully, you never really know!

How do you feel about the response to The Promised Land so far, and what do you hope audiences take away from it?

Compared to the big, beautiful period romance of A Royal Affair, we made a deliberate change in The Promised Land to go very earthy and gritty and tell a more harrowing human story. The response worldwide has been incredibly overwhelming, and I hope audiences enjoy becoming deeply immersed in these complex characters.

Icon Film Distribution presents THE PROMISED LAND in UK cinemas from February 16th.

Jeff Wayne | JEFF WAYNE’S MUSICAL VERSION OF THE WAR OF THE WORLDS

Jeff Wayne's Musical Version of the War of the Worlds

Jeff Wayne’s Musical Version of The War of the Worlds returns to the stage in 2025 with The Spirit of Man Tour, which will also mark the return of its 35-foot onstage Martian war machine. This adaptation of H.G. Wells’ The War of the Worlds remains one of the most popular musicals ever to be produced. STARBURST sat down with Wayne to discuss the new production and what the future might hold for his take on Wells’ story. 

STARBURST: How excited are you to bring The Spirit of Man tour to theatres? 

Jeff Wayne: I wouldn’t have been doing this for as many years as I have if it wasn’t as exhilarating as when I started with the tours in 2006. The live environment is, and I’m sure any musician or performer would say the same, the most exciting part of a person’s career. We’re all on stage during the performance; we’re not in an orchestral pit like you often get at the theatre. So it’s really most exciting. Two-and-a-half hours, and I feel like my feet never touch the floor. 

The scale of the production has increased significantly in the last 20 years, hasn’t it? What will this offer to the audience that they perhaps haven’t seen before? 

When I started doing this, I made a promise that we would never take The War of the Worlds out of the box and do it exactly the same way twice. There are new things technologically, and some of the show – more so in the next tour – is performed either in or over the audience with special effects and other things we do. Every production is different, and I hope we keep trying to top the previous ones because many people come back again and again.  

More and more stage musicals have been adapted for the big screen in recent years – Cats, Matilda, Mean Girls. What would you say if a studio approached you and said they wanted to make a film adaptation of your show?

It has been a dream to see my musical become a big-screen production, a film for TV, or a series. The way that The War of the Worlds is structured means that it is almost like a series with episodes, even though it’s all joined together. Even our CGI, which spans the whole length of our shows, is pretty much feature film standard. Over the years, I have had a couple of approaches, but usually, it has gone the way of “Okay, we would now like to turn it into a contemporary piece set in America or somewhere else”. And I’ve resisted that. I fell in love with the dark Victorian tale. So I know where I would like to go with it, and every time we finish a tour, we put some more time and effort into trying to make it happen. 

The Spirit of Man tour runs from March 28th to April 20th, 2025. You can buy tickets here.

Tom Morton-Smith | MY NEIGHBOUR TOTORO

Tom Morton-Smith is the writer who adapted Studio Ghibli’s My Neighbour Totoro for the Royal Shakespeare Company (RSC). He is also well-known for his plays Oppenheimer and The Earthworks, the latter of which originally played as part of the RSC’s Mischief Festival in 2017. Earthworks will also play at the Young Vic later this year.

STARBURST: Why Studio Ghibli?

Tom Morton-Smith: I’ve been in love with their work for so long. Not only are they visually stunning, but they often tap into powerful, deep-rooted emotions. A story such as My Neighbour Totoro is deceptively simple and joyous, but there is a pain at the heart of it – the illness of a parent and the pressures that it puts on a family. The grief of learning that your mum and dad are mortal is as universal as you can get – that the film handles such a delicate subject with such verve and imagination is a marvel. Yes, there are fantastical creatures, but they are warm, protective, and empathetic. Ghibli makes movies that hold you close as they entertain you, and that’s everything I want to do with my work.

Why the RSC?

When a company’s bread-and-butter is Shakespeare, they understand epic theatrical storytelling like no other. Through As You Like It and A Midsummer’s Night’s Dream, the ‘wild wood’ holds an important place in the Shakespearean canon, and spirits, sprites, and magic appear repeatedly – …Dream, The Tempest, Macbeth,etc. Because of that, My Neighbour Totoro sits very comfortably within the world of the RSC. This is also a company whose biggest successes have been stage adaptations of major non-theatrical works – Nicholas Nickleby, Les Mirables, Matilda The Musical – I can’t think of anyone else I’d trust to drive the Catbus!

What was the hardest part of My Neighbour Totoro to adapt?

So much of the film is in the atmosphere it conjures. I knew that if I could capture something close to that atmosphere, then the production would work, no matter what form the spirits and creatures took. But of course, the way that atmosphere works on stage is very different to the way it does in an animated film. So, trying to remain true to that sense of place and all of the feelings that the images evoke, but using an entirely different set of tools, was pretty tricky.

What considerations do you have to make for modern audiences with this adaptation?

Honestly, hardly any. The film was released in 1988 but set in 1955 – it was already a period piece – so there was no need to do too much in that regard.

In broader terms, what does the stage do better than animation?

There’s obviously a liveness to theatre that you can’t get anywhere else. You are watching actors and stage crew create the show in front of you – specifically for you. No other audience will see exactly what you see on the night you go. It was important to us that we leaned heavily on that liveness – that you can see the puppeteers as they bring Totoro to life, as they turn a piece of paper into a butterfly, or how they articulate all twelve legs of a full-size Catbus. It’s like showing the workings of a magic trick and not relying too heavily on technology so that the kids in the audience go home understanding how we made the show and that – given the chance – they could too.

What can we expect to see in the remounting of The Earthworks?

The Earthworks works on a much smaller scale than My Neighbour Totoro. It’s two strangers meeting in a hotel bar, getting a bit drunk, pestering a famous scientist, having a custard fight, and opening their hearts to each other. It’s gentle and a bit sad – so in that sense, it has some commonality with Totoro. But it’s funny, too. It’s one of my favourite things I’ve written, and I’m thrilled that more people will get to see it. And at the Young Vic, which is a theatre I love.

How different is creating a stage play from a screenplay?

There’s a freedom to write for the stage. When writing a screenplay, you have to consider what genre the film sits in, and with that comes rules and expectations. That doesn’t mean you can’t subvert those; it just means there is something to push against. Genre is a brilliant shorthand to have with a movie audience – put a man in a hat on a horse in the desert, and you have a Western – whereas, in theatre, you can be a bit more freeform, but it requires a little more explanation as to where and when everything is happening. As both a theatre nerd and a movie buff, I love both ways of working.

What is your favourite part of the production?

How can I pick?! The moment when the soot sprites leave the house. The first time we reveal Totoro. Kanta and his chickens. The iconic bus stop scene and the audience’s gasp when the Catbus arrives. But if I’m honest, my favourite moment is the last scene – at the hospital between the father, Tatsuo, and the mother,Yasuko.

How hard was it to put Catbus on the stage?

There was a lot of experimentation with the Catbus – in terms of its size, material, and mechanics of it. There was one puppetry workshop where we built a new Catbus every day for five days. He’s a big boy and an incredible piece of engineering. It takes eleven puppeteers to bring him to life every night, and it is demanding physical work. But for me, it wasn’t hard at all, I just wrote: ‘CATBUS enters.’

What other anime would you like to adapt? What other children’s stories would you like to work on?

I’d like to see some Satoshi Kon on stage – I think Paprika would work incredibly well. Or maybe Hosoda’s The Girl Who Leapt Through Time. Closer to home, I’ve often thought of rewriting The Wind in the Willows from the weasels’ point of view, taking over Toad Hall as an act of a working-class rebellion.

If you could give your 16-year-old self any piece of advice, what would it be?

Don’t care so much about what other people are thinking.

If you could see a stage play again – by perhaps travelling back in time – what would it be and why?

I remember being completely transported by Mnemonic by Complicité theatre company in 2003. The way that it weaved multiple narratives and spanned continents and centuries – and trusted the audience to see the patterns and links between its many disparate parts – was so galvanising and has stayed with me ever since.

What’s next for you?

When the theatres closed during the pandemic, I started to shift my focus more towards screenwriting. I have several feature films and a TV show in quite advanced stages of development. So, I guess we’ll see where all of that goes.

Doctor Who or Dr No?

The Bond films were very formative for me. They were constantly on TV when I was growing up, and whenever a new one came out, there would be a big family trip to the cinema to see it. The gadgets and the puns and the ridiculous rogues’ gallery. So I’ll say Dr No.

Dragons or Deathstars?

As a Trekkie, I am loathed to say ‘deathstars’, but I would generally always choose science fiction over fantasy.

Truth or Beauty?

A little from column A and a little from column B.

My Neighbour Totoro plays at the Barbican Centre until March 23rd. Tickets are available via the Barbican Box Office. https://www.rsc.org.uk/

Earthworks is at the Young Vic from March 26th – April 6th. www.youngvic.org

 

Clay Tatum & Whitmer Thomas | THE CIVIL DEAD

To celebrate the upcoming UK VOD release of the brilliantly funny ghost comedy The Civil Dead, we here at STARBURST were honoured to chat with director/co-writer/star Clay Tatum and co-writer/star Whitmer Thomas to talk about the film and sticking to an indie budget whilst telling a big and grounded story.

STARBURST: Congratulations on the film, it’s absolutely brilliant, we thoroughly enjoyed it.

Clay Tatum & Whitmer Thomas: Thank you so much; that means a lot.

Such a crazily unique concept and execution – where did this idea come from?

Clay: I thought of this during lockdown during the pandemic, and the basic premise was what if a ghost just annoyed you instead of scaring you when you’re being haunted? And I thought it was a funny idea. The story naturally arose from that premise. And it led me towards a certain ending that felt true and really interested me. So I thought that that would be a cool movie to write one day, then a friend of mine offered me a little bit of money to make a feature, so I pitched him this idea, and he said write it – so Whit came on board and wrote it with me. It was a really quick turnaround from the first idea to us making the film actually.

Whit, what were your thoughts when Clay came to you with this idea?

Whit: I thought it was cool. Clay just made something I was in that was similar tonally, so I was pumped to get involved with this one. The only thing I specified that I wanted to do is play the ghost, and Clay agreed [laughs]. There have been so many movies like this, but we wanted to make it stand out so we had the ending and wrote towards that ending and made it unique along the way.

You have both been friends for a long time – and that shows in your on-screen chemistry – and you play characters with your names. Did you draw a lot of inspiration from your real friendship and characteristics?

Whit: We will always end up writing to our real friendship. I’m definitely that guy who is banging on Clay’s door, saying, “Come do this cool thing”. Clay is definitely like his character in a lot of ways without spoiling the film [laughs]. It’s very true to us.

Clay: It’s also based on some people that we knew that followed us from Alabama to LA, expecting us to hang out a lot, and there was a weird friendship dynamic between us all. We couldn’t give them the time they wanted so that definitely helped us write this film, with that being the film’s main drama.

Whit: Everything that Clay and I write together, we’re always going to play these sorts of characters.

Clay: You don’t have to act as much when you don’t want to do something in a film [laughs].

Many aspects of the narrative will resonate with people – especially those in the creative industry. Is that a part of the story that was always important to include?

Clay: It’s like the adage of ‘write what you know’. I’m professionally unemployed all the time or under-employed, so that’s a thing that you think about 24/7, so it definitely helped.

Whit: We always make things super relatable. We will always have a character that needs $3k for something, as that is a life-changing sum of money for a lot of people. Some people would laugh at that, but we know how much you can actually do with that, so we always like to reference that. What kind of stories would we tell if we were rich? Only time will tell, who knows (laughs).

The film is very funny while also being bleak and real. How did you find writing that balance?

Clay: We always want to make ‘real movies’ and our main priority isn’t necessarily comedy, but we want to make it real and cool, and the comedy naturally comes with that. If you make someone laugh, then you know you’ve done something right, so comedy is important. I’m not brave enough to make something purely drama right now.

Whit: Writing stupid little jokes is something we will always do, and if people love them, then that is an extra bonus. While we were writing this, we were a little stressed – there is a scene where my character has no idea what 5G is. He thinks it means $5k, and it’s the dumbest joke in the whole script and we thought, “If this doesn’t work, then the whole tone of the movie is off”. But thankfully, people seem to love that moment.

Clay: That makes us way more comfortable in our future as writers and comedians, too. 98% of good movies are funny, so to have that moment resonate with people makes us feel great. You can have a movie that is bleak but also funny.

 

The bread crumbs and Chekov’s gun moments in the film are so well thought out and treat the viewers as intellectuals, which we love. Do you feel that that is an important part of storytelling in film?

Clay: Yeah, it’s hard to treat other people as intellectuals, though, when I guarantee I have a double-digit IQ, and with us, we want to show our confidence in our audience understanding the direction we are taking things.

Whit: What we hope that we’ve learned from this movie is that you don’t need to hand-hold the audience for them to understand you and your story. One of the scenes we had originally dumbed down, but then cut a bunch of stuff out as we realised that the extra bits were unnecessary. We have definitely grown as filmmakers throughout this whole process.

Let’s talk production – we love hearing stories of how other people get their films made. Can you tell us about some of the challenges you faced during the process?

Clay: This whole movie came about after my friend told us to take some money and make a movie. So that was painless, as everything came out of one phone call. The most trouble we had was fitting everything we wanted to do into a day. We shot a lot of pages per day, as we could only afford so many days to shoot. Whit had the realisation to save time and money by shooting some dialogue-less scenes without a whole cast and crew behind the camera. So a lot of the scenes of just walking from car to house, and that sort of stuff, was done with minimal crew to save a bunch of time.

Whit: When you’re making a lower-budget movie in 12 days – you don’t have to think about those 12 days. Shoot all the big important stuff first and then work out fun and cost-effective ways of getting those little moments, and the whole thing comes together nicely.

THE CIVIL DEAD is out now on VOD in the UK. You can read our review here.

Dolph Lundgren | WANTED MAN

dolph lundgren and christina villa in wanted man

Rising to fame as human-mountain and Soviet boxer Drago in Rocky IV, and as an icy Bond villain in A View to a Kill – both films released in 1985 –, Swedish actor and martial artist Dolph Lundgren would go on to become a mainstay of the action genre in the 1990s, a peer of B-movie legends Steven Seagal and Jean-Claude Van Damme. Since, Lundgren has continued acting, as well as producing, writing, and directing.

In recent years, he’s starred in a number of massive blockbusters that include The Expendables films, which reunited him with Sylvester Stallone, and a key role in the DCEU’s Aquaman movies. This year however, he returns as a multi-hyphenate force: as director, co-writer, producer, and star of Wanted Man, a timely action thriller that showcases Lundgren’s enduring talent for enacting a good fight scene.

In Wanted Man, Lundgren is Johansen, an ageing detective whose outdated policing methods have dragged his department into the middle of a public relations crisis. To save his job and get himself out of the media limelight, he is sent to Mexico to extradite a female witness (Christina Villa) to the murders of two DEA agents. Once there, not only does he have his worldview challenged, but he finds that forces on both sides of the border are now gunning for him and his charge.

Ahead of the film’s release, STARBURST spoke with Dolph Lundgren about his work on the picture, which comes to cinemas and on demand on January 19th.

dolph lundgren in wanted man, courtesy of quiver distribution

As co-writer, from where did you draw inspiration for this script?

Dolph Lundgren: Originally, it was developed about fifteen years ago and was inspired by this Clint Eastwood picture called Gauntlet, where he brings a prisoner across state lines. And I thought, why not instead have the story be about bringing someone over from Mexico? And then, I got caught up with a bunch of other projects, until a couple of years ago – immigration was such a hot topic, so maybe I’ll bring the script back.

Until later, when I was at a party and there was somebody there, this guy I know who’d had too many drinks and went on this rant about immigration. I was listening to him, thinking “that’s an interesting character” – to start with a character who was misinformed and evolve him into somebody that realises he’s wrong and works to change his attitude. It was with that in mind that we finished the script.

As well as undocumented immigration, Wanted Man touches on prescient topics like police brutality and corruption. As a Swedish actor living in the US, how does your background influence the lens through which you view these issues?

Dolph Lundgren: First of all, I am an immigrant, so I understand that feeling of wanting to be an American. I also know people who have made that journey across the border, so I know that part of it, too. I think not being from here, you can be more objective and more dispassionate about it. People here are so worked up over immigration, and while I can see both sides of the argument, I think… let’s just say that the way in which the movie ends, that’s my view on the matter. I try to see the issue with compassion.

A big part of your character’s journey comes from his knowing Christina Villa’s character. This being her first lead role, what made Christina the perfect counterpoint to your character, and how did the casting come about?

Dolph Lundgren: It was a very hard character to cast. I didn’t realise that at first, but when we started the casting process, I realised that I needed somebody who could play all those emotional moments: losing your best friend, being on the run, having your life in danger… and I wanted her to speak fluent Spanish. And that’s difficult because a lot of Hispanic actors that I was shown didn’t speak Spanish that well. I went through a long casting process before I found her. I also wanted somebody that you could believe is this character; she’s not too glamorous, and she has a certain street-smart quality to her. I was glad when we found her, and what I like about hers and mine’s characters’ relationship is that it doesn’t become a romantic relationship, necessarily. There’s a little feeling maybe, at the end, but it wasn’t about that. Them making out in a motel while people are out there hunting and shooting at them, that would have been the cheap version of this film.

Throughout the film, there are several conversations that happen in Spanish, that are not subtitled and therefore the viewers are not privy to. Then at other times, it is captioned in English. What went behind that decision?

Dolph Lundgren: I wasn’t sure about that at first. I decided that when Johanssen is around, he doesn’t understand and so the viewer doesn’t either. Then when he isn’t around and there’s a more intimate conversation that doesn’t involve him, and has information that we need to know, then I would put the subtitles on there.

dolph lundgren and christina villa in wanted man

You were involved at every level of this film. With everything going on, what was your biggest challenge?

Dolph Lundgren: I wish I’d been more involved in the producing. I was very involved in the directing and acting, and writing… I’m not a big fan of writing, I prefer to rewrite stuff. I wish I’d done more of the producing, because we’d decided to go down to New Mexico to shoot the Mexican scenes. But we had big problems on location, and I hadn’t been involved in hiring the people there. So next time, I’m going to be more of a producer and look at the budget and everything in detail. With a small movie, the margins of error are very tight. Otherwise though, it was a big effort and I’d love to do it again.

Your career has centred on the action genre. As a director, what keeps you coming back to action films?

Dolph Lundgren: I’ve directed eight movies, and all of them have some action component. I think part of it is that it’s part of my brand, and part of who I am. People like to see me do things on film physically, to move, and it tends to work in the story context… I’ve done movies as an actor, like Aquaman, where my character is more of a political figure.

And as a director, it would be hard for me – unless I wrote a great script like Sideways, about wine-tasting in Northern California – not to have some form of action and get that project made. But then, would I be the best director to do that? A new script I’m working on is a dark comedy set in LA – it has action in it, but it’s more character-driven.

I think eventually, as I get older, I will do more character-driven stuff and less action. The guy I look up to is Clint Eastwood, where in his 70s and 80s he ended up doing films like Gran Torino – it’s a super character-driven story, but he still whips out his rifle and goes to town.

Wanted Man releases in cinemas and on-demand from January 19th. Watch the trailer below:

<iframe width=”560″ height=”315″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/Uaz1D2oYzco?si=5PBGGZ162ci0Y2IT” title=”YouTube video player” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share” allowfullscreen></iframe>

John Billingsley • TREK TALK

John Billingsley is best known for his portrayal of Phlox: Star Trek Enterprise’s eccentric, gregarious doctor. Outside of Trek he’s a well-established character actor, having appeared on everything from 24 to Pam and Tommy. But alongside acting, Billingsley devotes a lot of time to charity, and is the organiser and host of Trek Talks – an annual online Star Trek telethon. Now in its third year, this year’s Trek Talks takes place on Saturday January 13th, and boasts an impressive lineup of guests including Jonathan Frakes, Terry Matalas, Brent Spiner and Tawny Newsome. It’s free to stream on YouTube, and raising money for the Hollywood Food Coalition, an LA-based charity that Billingsley has been involved with for a number of years. STARBURST recently spoke to him about everything from his charity work, to Enterprise, filming naked orgies, and Kyle MacLachlan’s nipples…

STARBURST: Hi John. Thanks for taking the time to speak with us. What can people expect from this year’s Trek Talks?

John Billingsley: Well, it’s going to be a great show. It’s eight hours long. It’s on January 13th, from 10 in the morning to 6 in the evening, Pacific Time. I don’t know how that translates to the various parts of Great Britain [Note: It’s 6pm until 2am]. Every two-hour block contains a multitude of different panels, different interviews. We’ve got a one-hour-long interview with people from Picard Season 3, including Jonathan [Frakes], Brent [Spiner], Ashley Chestnut, Todd Stashwick, and a few others. Jonathan del Arco is going to moderate.

We’ve got a great panel that the SyFy Sistas are conducting with Michelle Hurd and a variety of other wonderful African American women who played instrumental roles in the history of Star Trek. It’s sort of a homage to Nichelle Nichols on Martin Luther King weekend. We’ve got a female scientists panel. We’ve got a panel devoted to looking at the episode Tuvix with most of the male cast from Voyager and one of the writers. We’ve also got standalones with a number of other guests, including Nana Visitor, and a couple that we haven’t yet formally announced yet because they haven’t quite dotted the I’s and cross the T’s. So, it’ll be a really fun day.

Can you tell us a little bit about the Hollywood Food Coalition, and how you became involved with them?

I know right now, folks in England are experiencing similar problems in this tricky economy. There is a lot of hunger in America and a lot of homelessness in America. We’re an organisation that’s devoted to attempting to address issues of hunger and poverty. And in essence, what we’re really wanting to do is to use food as a medium to help sew up a tattered social safety net. We provide around three million pounds of food a year for about 150 other not-for-profits to buttress and augment their meal programmes. Additionally, we serve a hot meal to all comers seven nights a week in our own home kitchen. And we also make sure that the people who come to us are connected in turn to some of the organisations that we’re supplying food to.

We want to kind of create a virtuous circle amongst the social service community in Los Angeles. And lastly, we work with organisations that are interested in doing what we’re interested in doing, which is seeing if there are big-picture solutions to hunger that can only be addressed collectively. For instance, food is available that we don’t have enough joint refrigeration capacity, storage capacity, transportation capacity for, etc. How do we work together to solve some of those problems?

How did you first become involved with them?

Well, the long version of the story is that after Trump won, I think I, like a lot of people in my country – and I imagine many people feel similarly, after many years of the Conservative Party – wanted to do something that would respond on a personal level, to what I thought was a deep tragedy. I wanted to feel like I was not retreating out of fear and rage but moving forward out of compassion and care.

So, I looked around at some at some length for a place that I could get myself to, and I walked in the door of this great joint – my wife actually led the way – and started making fruit salads, washing dishes, just doing quotidian stuff. But I realised it was a great organisation that maybe needed a little bit more of a sense of communitarianism. We are a coalition. And I didn’t think all the folks who were interested in doing the work were getting together and talking about the future. I helped organise the board, helped organise a little bit more structure, and helped organise a bit more of a drive towards expanding our capacity to help by rescuing and sharing more food.

I think in part because I was a theatre actor for many years and I didn’t have a buck, that the idea of being hungry and not knowing where your next meal is going to come from actually has a certain kind of personal resonance.

Is that why you what you think you chose that particular charity over others?

I’m a great believer that we all need to ask ourselves: “What is my voluntaristic bliss? Where am I going to be most happy?” And it varies wildly. Some people I think are going to be happiest teaching a kid how to read, or maybe volunteering in a prison or cleaning up the beaches.

I don’t know why, but for me there was always something very appealing about working with an organisation that provides direct services to people in need. I used to be on the board of an organisation called the AIDS Service Centre. We were kind of a one-stop shopping centre for people who had HIV AIDS-related issues. That kind of immediate gratification from feeling like somebody’s important daily needs are being provided for has always had a lot of resonance for me.

Again, I think, in part it’s because for many, many years, I made under $10,000 a year. I lived on food stamps, I was on unemployment insurance, I always had to scrounge a bit, not only my next gig, but my next paycheck, and my next rent check consequently. I had some good fortune later in life, but there’s been too many years in my life when I was, not hungry, but concerned about what was going to happen for me to have forgotten.

Do you do much other charity work? I know you’re involved with PanCAN as well, aren’t you?

My mother passed away from pancreatic cancer when she was 70. From diagnosis to death was two months. I found out that Kitty Swink – Armin Shimerman’s wife – and Jonathan Frakes were actually working with the wonderful, wonderful group Pancreatic Cancer Action Network. They organised a team to walk and raise money, which Kitty has been doing for a number of years, and they asked me if I would join, and I said “absolutely.” Right now, that’s a little more on the backburner. For me. I kind of have a two-step approach; first there’s the intense preparation for Trek Talks, and once that ends, I do a little bit more of a shuffling of the pots and I lean forward into PanCAN a bit more, although I’m also on the board of the Hollywood Food Coalition. And I chair the development committee, so all year long I’m involved in helping to raise money and awareness of it.

Would you say that charity is now more your focus than acting?

Yeah. I still love to act and I’m always happy to act. But in all candour, since Trump won, I’ve wanted to do more charitable work, but it wasn’t as if it was a brand-new thing. But I definitely moved the focus. I told my agents that I would like to be offer only [where established actors accept offers for roles but won’t audition for parts] and put more time into charitable work. You then find out right away that when you say offer only, you aren’t going to get the offers, and it’s like, “okay, well, I found out I’m not an offer only actor!” I’ve subsequently rescinded that and said, “alright, I’m back auditioning.” I don’t want to send any energy out to the universe, suggesting that I’m uninterested in acting. But once folks in the industry begin to feel you’ve receded, they’re happy to let you recede. And I’m not a stage actor anymore. I haven’t done any stage acting in a long time. That used to be something that you can keep percolating. And that is something I’ve had to let go of.

Moving onto Enterprise, Phlox was a very different type of Star Trek character. The closest to him previously was probably Voyager’s Neelix, who proved quite divisive. Did you have any concerns about how you’d be received by fans?

I wasn’t particularly conversant with Star Trek history. I’d watched the original shows as a kid, but when I got this gig, I certainly had my finger on the pulse of popular culture enough to know that it was life-changing. But I didn’t know what Phlox was, or how he was related to all of the other species that had been introduced from Next Gen on through to Voyager. It was all Greek to me. I’d never heard of Neelix, I’d never watched Voyager. I did ask a pal of mine to give me a crash course in Star Trek history. He sat me down and I watched a few episodes of each show, so I didn’t begin work on Enterprise with quite as much ignorance as when I got the part.

But how you’re perceived is outside of your control. All you can do is try and play what’s on the page. I mean, he was clearly a buoyant character with his trademark optimism, but also there’s just the sense that this is a guy who leaves his home planet. He’s well into advanced middle age, and I would imagine he’s got grown kids. He’s lived a good chunk of his life. And in my opinion, he’s going off rather merrily on what is probably a suicide mission – I mean, Earthlings for God’s sake, taking their first ship out! And he says, “yeah, I’ll come along, what the hell! What’s the worst that could happen? I die.” To me, he always was kind of like a Buddhist, he had a relaxed sense of having lived a life, one now let’s go of fear of death, and then moves on to the next stage.

 

Star Trek Enterprise (2001-2005)

Looking back on the series now, how do you think it holds up?

I haven’t watched it much. Since it found a new audience on Netflix, I certainly have gotten a sense from people that maybe some of the initial knee-jerk negativity had as much to do with the fact that there was a certain amount of Star Trek fatigue when it premiered in 2001. I think now that has been looked at outside of time, I think there are people who might appreciate what it did well, more than was true at the time. That said, I always had my issues too. In my opinion, what I would have liked to see them do more with the show is really play up the idea that as the first Earth ship, we had our heads up our ass. We didn’t know what the fuck was coming next. The transporter terrified us. The weapons malfunctioned. In my opinion, if we’d gone more for almost a Robert Altman sense of disarray, overlapping dialogue and “what the hell was that?” Not that we would have been in full panic mode all the time, but there might have been a little bit more of a sense of really getting our feet wet. I think they started with that idea, but it quickly became a little bit more “your daddy’s Star Trek.”

Most fans seem to feel that it found its footing in Season Three. I have some issues politically with what the Xindi arc meant at a time when we were thinking about invading Iraq. I wasn’t too crazy about the idea that these lizards attacked the Earth, and anything goes to beat the bastards. That wasn’t necessarily the easiest message for me to swallow. On the other hand, it definitely provided a tension and a sense of urgency that I think the show had been missing. A lot of my favourite episodes fall within the arc of Season Three, if only because even if they didn’t have anything to do with the Xindi, there was a sense of tension that was lacking for a while on the show.

People forget, but Enterprise debuted three weeks after 9/11. I’ve always wondered, do you think part of the show’s negative reception was because the optimistic sci-fi tone was out of touch with public mood? I think Season Three reflected more of what was going on in America at the time.

Possibly, although I think one tends to overstate that. I mean, our culture is vast, God knows. And we have so many different influences, even at the time you could have found any number of shows on television that didn’t have to bow in the direction of 9/11, that had their own spirit and their own sensibility.

I think for me, it was more about the fact that because Rick [Berman] and Brannon [Braga] were rushed into production, they didn’t really have a fully fleshed out Bible for what the show wanted to do and what it wanted to be. There is a story that I tell which doubtless people have heard 1,000 times. But nonetheless, it is the story that to me kind of encapsulated what I think one of the issues was. Early on, there was a script, [for the episode Strange New World] and the transporter, which we tried not to use, did indeed malfunction. In the original draft, which was not filmed, the crewman comes back from that planet’s surface and his head is where his ass should be. By the time it got through all the various drafts, what we ended up filming was that the guy comes back from the planet surface, and there’s a twig sticking out of his ear. I thought, “there you go, that’s the opportunity missed.”

The show ended after four seasons, and while respectable, it was less than its predecessors. Why do you think it happened to end early, and when did you first get a sense that the writing was on the wall?

I think there was a certain amount of Star Trek fatigue. I think maybe it wasn’t quite a bold enough departure to have the same kind of version of Star Trek that audiences have been watching for a number of years. But some of it was also just the reality of network politics. We were on UPN in the States, which was a dying network. Nobody in Hollywood wanted to pitch an idea for a show to UPN. Nobody wanted to be on UPN, everybody pretty much knew its days were numbered. It becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. They don’t have anything else on it, which means that when they go out to the various small marketplaces, Austin, Texas or Bumfuck, Iowa and they’re saying, “hey, pick up UPN,” the affiliate stations say, “okay, but we get to choose which shows we air and when we air them.” So frequently, Enterprise was not actually aired.

As a for instance, in San Antonio we went to a convention, and nobody showed up. We found it was because in the San Antonio market, we were always pre-empted for high school football games on Friday nights. So, there were a lot of factors that came into play. Not only did we not necessarily get a huge response from the audience, but then the show was impossible to find frequently for those people who did want to watch it. UPN was only kept alive for its last few seasons by our presence. Oddly, not only did we not make it for more than four years, but we held a network in place that was dying. And with us, it went.

Some of the Star Trek casts, particularly The Next Generation, are very close to each other. Are the Enterprise cast similar?

To a certain extent. I think what keeps a lot of the casts close is the fact that we see each other at conventions, and one of the nice, wonderful perks of Star Trek is – aside from the money – if you’re sociable, the idea that you get to see people you love on a regular basis, not only other actors, but fans as well. There are some folks from Enterprise who don’t choose to participate in that world: Jolene [Blalock], and Scott [Bakula] still has a very successful career, so he’s not around very much. Connor [Trinneer], Dominic [Keating] and Anthony [Montgomery], and to a lesser extent, Linda [Park], we see each other a fair amount, and I love them all. We’re probably not as close as some of the other casts, because some of the other casts have been doing it longer. The Next Gen cast has been out on the road together for years.

But what is interesting is that you become close to people who weren’t in your cast. So, Bob Picardo is a good friend. Nana Visitor is a very good friend. There are a number of people that I love from the other iterations. I haven’t really gotten to know folks from the current iterations yet. They’re in production, so they’re not as often at the various conventions. And I don’t tend to go to as many conventions as I used to either. But it takes a certain kind of personality, I think, not just to be on Star Trek – for actors it’s a gig – but to want to participate in the ongoing of Star Trek the rest of your life. I think the folks who want to be close self-select themselves into that circle.

Talking about the new shows, do you keep up with any of them at all?

Billingsley: To a certain extent. I don’t really watch a ton of television. I wanted to be a writer, so my first love is and always has been reading. It’s not that I don’t like TV, it’s just that there’s only so many hours in the day, so I’m sparing about TV. I’ve watched a few episodes of the various iterations of the show, just so I kind of know what I’m talking about, but I’m not up to date by any means. And in fact, I don’t think I’m up to date about anything. The last show I think I watched in its entirety was probably Better Call Saul. No, Succession, I watched Succession.

My wife and I will pick a show, we’ll watch it from beginning to end, it’ll take us months. It means one night a week, maybe two, we’ll watch an hour of television. And that’s about as much as I give myself. And then this year my wife [actress Bonita Friedericy] is a nominator for the SAG Awards, so we’re watching more movies than we ever do. And it’s fun, but I’m usually looking forward to getting back to my book.

I’m assuming you’d be open to appearing on any of the new shows if they ask?

Sure. Hell yeah. I find myself having this conversation a lot. I’d be delighted to return to any of the iterations of Star Trek, although I’m beginning to think because this has come up in a variety of interviews that the people who create these shows are going “shut up already!” But if you happen to be reading this, oh writers of Strange New Worlds, I’m around!

You’ve been suggesting recently that Phlox could show up on Strange New Worlds as a successful author of sex manuals?

People ask what do I think Phlox is doing later in life? I don’t know, can’t the guy retire? If it was up to me, he’d probably be sipping Mai Tais on Risa. But, you know, somebody has written my story already, so I suppose if you’re really deep diving, you can find out what happened to Dr. Phlox, and he’s apparently been doing all sorts of amazing shit. He runs a little bookstore somewhere, he goes home, he’s got his wives, he’s got a Beagle. He’s decided Beagles are not such a bad idea. The one thing he took away from the Enterprise, they’re kind of cute.

You’ve done a lot of guest spots on classic shows like The West Wing, X-Files, 24, and Twin Peaks. Have you got a particular favourite you’ve done over the years?

I did a couple of episodes of Cold Case where I played a really horrible serial killer. That was kind of fun. I’ve played a lot of horrible serial killers. Similarly, on NYPD Blue I was a cab driver who murdered his African American fares because he was in his dark heart a racist. That was pretty perverse. On Nip/Tuck I was a guy who felt he had an extraneous leg. And apparently this is a real condition people who feel that they are carrying the burden of an extra limb and want to self-amputate. That was that was kind of an interesting part. I liked being on Masters of Sex a few years back, I had kind of a fun part as a shrink. Recently, I enjoyed being on Pam and Tommy, where I played absolutely scabrous and scurrilous attorney for Penthouse Magazine. Everything has something fun to recommend it. But generally speaking, the life of a character actor, you go from show to show to show and occasionally you get lucky and get a TV series. But for the most part, it’s just for a couple of weeks, you’re getting to wear somebody else’s trousers and you try and have a good time doing it.

Twin Peaks: The Return (2017)

You did an episode of the new Twin Peaks. Were you there long enough to get to know David Lynch at all?

Billingsley: No – very, very short appearance.

Just the one scene…

One scene with Kyle, yeah. What did interest me is that David Lynch does not audition actors. You don’t come in and read scenes or prepare material. You’re just asked a question. And the question in this instance was “tell me something interesting you did today.” And I had given my cat an enema. I told the story. I never thought I’d give a cat an enema, that’s not a pleasant experience, I didn’t like it. Anyway, they cast me as a doctor. I told the cat, “As much as I didn’t want to give you an enema, I guess it paid off. I’m on Twin Peaks, thanks pal.” He didn’t take it in the spirit it was intended, he was more like, “fuck you!” It wasn’t a good role, but it did get me a part, and I have touched Kyle MacLachlan’s nipple.

After Enterprise, your biggest TV role was probably in True Blood. From what I know about your sense of humour, I imagine you really enjoyed yourself on that show?

No, I didn’t, it was miserable. It was a pretty small part, so I didn’t feel like I was part of it [Billingsley had a recurring role as the town’s coroner]. Much of the first season my role consisted of me saying “coming through,” as I was carrying a corpse. The second season, there was a season-long orgy, and Michelle Forbes was the villainess. She had us all in her thrall, and she fed off the erotic energy. So, the entire season was me basically having sex with a tree, having sex with a lamp post, having sex with a bar wench, anything that moved, I was down to fuck it. As was everybody else! But what this meant was that you were frequently naked, it was frequently cold out when you were doing the orgy scenes. It was actually a fairly miserable experience, plus I had to wear these gargantuan black contact lenses. So, you’re wandering round, you can’t see a fucking thing, there’s dust in your eyes, you’re freezing cold, the last thing in the world you actually feel is erotic!

In one instance, there was a woman who was playing a dirty dancer who I was dancing with. She was an extra, a perfectly nice lady, but she was bound and determined to reveal both breasts on camera because you get paid 50 bucks a breast. She was constantly trying to reveal both breasts, which would fuck up the shot, and you’d hear the director go “cut, just cover the left breast, we just want to see the right one.” Eventually I said to her “look, just show the one fucking breast, I’ll give you 50 bucks and let’s get on with this!”

My wife, when I would come home at night would ask me what I did, and I’d be “dirty danced with some lady, and I had to rub maraschino cherry juice on her tits. Another day at the office.” She was not having any of that. I kept telling her it’s a miserable experience, just you wait. And eventually she got an audition to be in a horror film for Rob Zombie [Lords of Salem], and she had to be a naked witch. And she wasn’t going to do it, and I said, “oh no, you’re doing it!” Vengeance is sweet. So, she auditioned, she got cast, Rob Zombie said, “the reason I cast you is because you look so pissed off that you have to be here.” Marriage is just basically 40 years of getting vengeance.

What’s next for you after Trek Talks?

I’m very invested in the future of this organisation [The Hollywood Food Coalition] so I spend a lot of time working for them, and I will continue to do so. Beyond that, workwise, we’ll see if anything comes up. Now that the strike is over, one is theoretically auditioning again. I’m not sure I’m on anyone’s list, and there’s not as much work once you’re over a certain age. I’m in my 60s, what work there is, you’re competing against people who are really good. It’s not like when you’re younger and you’re going up for a part and there’s a reasonably chance that half the people you’re auditioning with aren’t up to snuff. The missus and I will do some travelling, I’m going on the Trek cruise in February, monitoring the cats’ health against the possibility that I’ll have to give them enemas in the future, and reading.

Last question. Robert Picardo occasionally likes to say mean things about you. Have you got any rumours – true or otherwise – that you’d like to spread about him?

Where do I begin? I make fun of Bob because he makes fun of me, it’s clearly something we enjoy doing. I think we both secretly wish we could go back in time and become Jack Benny and Fred Allen, who had a notorious feud for years in the old radio days, which I think neither of us can unfortunately ever rival. But he is a deep love, and I really can’t say enough nice things about him, much as I hate to disappoint you. I wish I could spread some spurious rumour about him but no, he seems to be happy, healthy, and living the high life. He certainly continues to get all the work that I want!

He’s back on Star Trek in a few months [in the second season of Prodigy]…

I know! What I do know in my heart of hearts though is that when the toll is taken up yonder and they’re saying, “and now, will the sexiest doctors on Star Trek step forward,” I will be, along with Wilson [Cruz], at the head of the line, and Bob – the hologram – will be at the back.

I think that’s the perfect note to leave it on.

Yes, my pleasure.

You can stream TREK TALKS live on YouTube from 6pm GMT on Saturday January 13th. See the full line-up and donate to the Hollywood Food Coalition here. Following the live stream, the event will remain available to watch on YouTube.

Tony Leung & Andy Lau | THE GOLDFINGER

The Goldfinger is a new, big-screen crime caper. And no, it’s not a remake of the James Bond 007 classic, but for those old enough to remember, it brings two Hong Kong superstars back together after their acclaimed undercover cop thriller, Infernal Affairs (2002).

More than 20 years later, Tony Leung (Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, The Grandmaster) and Andy Lau (The Wandering Earth II, House of Flying Daggers) are back with writer-director Felix Chong (The Silent War, Overheard), now taking directing duties on this sweeping criminal story set in the Hong Kong financial market.

Recently promoting the release in UK and Irish cinemas, Leung and Lau were kind enough to answer some questions about making this ambitious film.

The Goldfinger follows the rise and fall of a multi-billion-dollar company and its chairman Cheng Yi-yan (Leung), who undergoes a major investigation led by an anti-corruption investigator (Lau) who dedicates himself to the case, even putting his life and family at risk, to bring justice.

Set across multiple periods during the 1970s and 1980s, the film boasts many different looks for its cast of characters, and noticeable changes in the epic production design. There’s a great soundtrack to boot.

Tony Leung explains, “These jumps in chronology didn’t affect us much. We had the full script, so we could plan ahead for our performances or ways of acting for each specific time. As for makeup, I mainly have three different styles to help create the character.”

Andy Lau recollects, “When I watched the film, I didn’t see much de-aging digital technology being applied. For the later part where we get older makeup, I have to credit the makeup team, for the hair and face, they didn’t put latex or something like that to make me look older, just normal makeup, and making aging more obvious [laughs]. This made me feel more comfortable.”

Yet for Tony Leung, his villain character – a fearlessly ambitious showman – proved to be one of the most demanding of his career to date. He says, “For me, every scene playing this role was challenging because I’ve never played someone this cocky and flamboyant, or unreserved. So, this character is the most challenging for me.”

In addition to uniting these two titans of Hong Kong cinema, The Goldfinger stars fellow industry veterans Simon Yam (Ip Man), Charlene Choi (New Police Story) and rising stars like Michael Ning (One More Chance), Carlos Chan (Anita) and Catherine Chau (The Counterfeiter).

With encouragement, Andy Lau adds, “We have worked in the industry for more than 40 years. Now we hope that a new generation of actors and actresses can have chance to work on big productions, to let audiences see our new blood.”

“Because of the change of demand, we [in Hong Kong] cannot just produce crime thrillers. This time we wanted to make a change too, apart from focusing on crime, there is something new. The Goldfinger doesn’t only focus on the villain and the cop, it also shows who else can be there when there is a loophole in the operation”, referencing the cast of shady characters who populate its world, from slick businessman to sinister gangsters.

The Goldfinger, with its deep narrative, powerful performances and slick style and visuals, goes a long way to re-establishing the big screen impact of Hong Kong cinema. Encouraging audiences to see the film, Lau simply adds, “if you miss seeing Tony and me, go and watch it!”

Trinity CineAsia presents The Goldfinger in UK and Irish cinemas from January 5th.

Book tickets here: https://trinitycineasia.com/in-cinemas/the-goldfinger/

Alice Englert | BAD BEHAVIOUR

Alice Englert is a rising star best known from the critically acclaimed Ginger & Rosa, Gothic fantasy Beautiful Creatures and, most recently, award-winning western, The Power of the Dog (directed by her mother Jane Campion).

Now, Englert has embarked on her directorial debut, a funny, touching, and offbeat comedy-drama called Bad Behaviour starring Jennifer Connelly (Top Gun: Maverick, Requiem for a Dream) and Ben Whishaw (This Is Going to Hurt, No Time to Die).

Jennifer Connelly plays Lucy, a former child actress who seeks healing from past traumas, embarking on a ‘semi-silent’ spiritual retreat run by Ben Whishaw’s new-age guru, Elon. Even with the best intentions, it proves to be anything but relaxing, especially with a self-obsessed celebrity model joining the retreat. Meanwhile, Lucy also struggles to connect with her stunt performer daughter, Dylan (played by Englert), leading the pair to confront their own complicated relationship finally.

To coincide with Bad Behaviour arriving in UK cinemas, we caught up with Alice to talk about her filmmaking debut, her love of fantasy, and what’s next.

STARBURST: What inspired you to write Bad Behaviour?

Alice Englert:  It was inspired by going to retreats when I was younger. I wanted to see what happens when that part of you that wants to let go, instead of a gentle release, holds on for dear life, starts yelling and screaming and ruins it for everybody else! [laughs] That’s absolutely not what they put on the brochure! So, it was something I wanted to explore, but with kindness. I was also inspired by this Medusa painting by Caravaggio because it always scared me when I was a kid, and I wondered why. So, I wanted to spend some time in that space.

You have a very impressive star cast, which includes Jennifer Connelly and Ben Whishaw; how was it working with them?

I’m such a fan of both. I love Jennifer so much. In some of her scenes, I was watching her, and I really don’t know how she did it, like in the swaddling baby scene. She’s just so good. I wrote Ben’s role with him in mind and he was really keen on the script. We also have an amazing supporting cast, including Dasha Nekrasova (Succession), Beulah Koale (Hawaii Five-0) and Ana Scotney (Educators), and a fantastic crew who made the experience so much fun.

You mentioned the swaddling adult baby scene. Without giving anything away, it’s both funny and immediately emotional. How did you strike that balance?

It wasn’t in the original script, and I was so worried that I was writing a film that made no sense! But my producer encouraged me to take this core idea and go even crazier, so when I had permission to go there, that’s when I think everything happened that actually made it a movie. This one scene became about being vulnerable, from being in a ridiculous situation to realising you’re going to cry in front of everybody, and then it just happens, and there’s nothing you can do. I guess the audience gets put in baby mode for that moment, laughing one minute and crying the next! To be honest, I didn’t know what it would look like, but I really can’t believe actors sometimes! Like I said, I don’t know how Jennifer did it.

Jennifer Connelly and Ana Scotney

You mentioned Dasha Nekrasova, who is also fantastic in the film!I think Dasha is so good as Beverly, the model. I love all her scenes, and she made it so quietly funny, I had to leave the set at times because I was laughing. In the emotional climax between Lucy and Beverly, which I don’t want to spoil, it’s crazy because sometimes you write something, and then, suddenly, everyone’s doing it and you almost have to get out of their way, literally in this case! When you’re working with a talented team, you get these amazing moments.

It was fun seeing your character being a stunt woman in the story!

Yeah absolutely, and I also want to say how awesome it was working with Dayna Grant who was our stunt coordinator. She’s been Wonder Woman and Xena: Warrior Princess and it was really rewarding and so much fun working with her. Also, Jess O’Connor was my stunt double and Jennifer’s too, so she took double duty. The whole team was brilliant and I’m so grateful for that.

Is writing, directing, and acting in the same film hard? And how do you juggle all those responsibilities?

For me, it’s weirdly not so hard because I think my brain needs a lot of stimulation! In a strange way that acrobatic feeling and juggling different tasks works well for me. Also, while it was a fast shoot and quite intense, in the past I’ve spent six months filming in a corset, so this was easy in comparison! All the cast, crew and producers were very trusting and fully behind the film. So for me, it’s more a question of asking myself how can I be generous with my time and efforts, in the way these people are being generous with theirs towards me?

Dasha Nekrasova

What would you like audiences to take away from Bad Behaviour?

One of my favourite things when I watch stuff is that feeling of wanting to make my own thing next! That’s something I’ve always felt, from indies to big blockbusters. For me, stories have the power to make someone else feel like they can do something. You get a chain reaction so I don’t want the conversation to end. I’d love to see people enjoy my film, then go and make their own work, keep making stuff and for it to continue going around. That, and I hope people experience laughter and comfort.

Finally, as an actor, you’ve worked across many genres including horror and fantasy. Would you like to do more of that? Maybe directing?

Yes, I want people to hire me to do big fantasy! I mean, I’ve got a Hobbit haircut right now, and I spend so much time in worlds other than this one! [laughs] I just filmed a miniseries as an actor that I loved doing, I can’t talk about it yet, but keep an eye out! Even as a filmmaker, I think my films are fantasy stories but set in the real world. I always imagine everybody as larger-than-life, as huge heroes and villains, and then bring it more down to earth. But I love fantasy, and I love ‘love’ as well. I really want to write a romantic film, but I also think there’s room to be funny because romance usually is!

 

BAD BEHAVIOUR is released in selected cinemas from January 5th 

Buy and Rent on Digital from February 5th

Daniel Foxx | UNFORTUNATE

Daniel Foxx

Daniel Foxx is a rising star in the British comedy scene, best known for his short comedy skits on social media and phenomenally sharp wit. When he’s not on TikTok, BBC One, or other TV screens, he’s writing musicals. We caught up with him to talk about The Little Mermaid parody, Unfortunate, currently on at the Southwark Playhouse Elephant until the middle of February 2024.

STARBURST: How would you explain Unfortunate to an elderly relative who loves cartoon fairy tales but has never heard of Wicked?

Daniel Foxx: I’d say, “Grandma, you know how the best character in all those cartoon fairy tales you watch is ALWAYS the big, glamorous camp villain?”. And she’d say, “Yes! I notice they’re always the best part, but we never get enough of them!” And I’d say, “well, we agree, so we made a musical that fixes that” and she’d say, “Wow, slay!”.

We’ve basically taken an icon and given her the stage time she deserves and the chance to tell her side of the story in all its rude, lewd, vivacious glory.

How different is the new show from the first draft? And how different is it from the show STARBURST saw in Edinburgh 2022?

Oh gosh, so different. The core is the same: it’s Ursula’s story, she is centre stage, and our aim always is a punchy comedy with proper belly laugh jokes. But it’s grown and grown with each production – compared to the first draft in 2019, this show is an extravaganza. Even since 2022, there are a tonne of new songs, new characters, new puppets, and new scenes. This is the biggest and best the show has been – it’s the version we always wanted to make.

How did you end up working with Robyn and Fat Rascal?

I wrote my first play in 2015 and took it to the Edinburgh Fringe. We had a great time, and afterwards we were like, “this could be a good musical, actually”. The producer, Laura Elmes – who is now producing Unfortunate – put me in touch with “a great musical theatre writer she met recently”, Robyn. We fell in love and have been writing together ever since.

What other popular fairy tales/media franchises would you like to see given the Unfortunate treatment?

I’d love to see a really camp and fabulous Darth Vader musical.

You’re best known for short skits on TikTok; what do you find more rewarding: theatre or sketch comedy?

I love them both for different reasons. Making little skits for TikTok and Instagram is freeing because it’s just playing about in front of a camera in my kitchen and putting a video out that same evening. Putting on a musical is obviously a much more involved process, but I love working in a group with Robyn and Tim Gilvin, our composer. Nothing compares with sitting in the audience of something you’ve written and hearing a live audience laugh.

Your show at 2023’s Edinburgh Fringe, Villain, felt very personal and raw in some places. Is that typical of your approach to comedy?

Yes, I like it when you leave a comedy show feeling like you actually know the performer. I love comedians like Simon Amstell, Mae Martin, and Tig Notaro, where you obviously laugh a lot but also learn a little something about their lives.

What’s your favourite moment in Unfortunate?

Well, Robyn’s already said “Suckin on You”, our new ’80s power-ballad masterpiece, so I’ll go for the top of Act 2: there’s a scene between the French Chef and Sebastian the Crab, both of whom are played by Allie Dart. Watching her sprinting around, pulling off the quick changes, is hysterical.

What’s the most important thing about musical theatre?

Bops. Big, glorious bangers that make you go, “oh my god, what a song”.

What can we see you in next?

We’ve got an original musical in the works, telling the story of Medusa. In the meantime, I’m taking my standup show Villain around the UK in 2024 – so either find me in a venue somewhere, or on Instagram, as always!

UNFORTUNATE The Untold Story Of Ursula The Sea Witch – A Musical Parody can be found at the Southwark Playhouse Elephant until February 17th 2024.  You can book tickets here.