[ENDED] Win THE KARATE KID Movie Collection on Blu-ray

karate win

We’ve teamed up with Sony Pictures to giveaway The Karate Kid movie collection. All you have to do is enter the competition below – it’s as easy as “Wax on… wax off”.

For the first time, all four of The Karate Kid movies are available to buy on in one Blu-ray collection, and we have three copies to giveaway!

As well as featuring the movies, the boxset includes a hilarious gag reel and Behind-The-Scenes bonus extras. This really is a must for all fans!

 a Rafflecopter giveaway

The Karate Kid Collection is available on Blu-ray to buy now.

[ENDED] Win THE DOORMAN with Ruby Rose and Jean Reno on DVD

win doorman

We’ve teamed up with Lionsgate to giveaway 3 copies of THE DOORMAN on DVD, check out the details of the film and enter the competition below.

In Ryuhei Kitamura’s The Doorman, acting legend Jean Reno (Léon: The Professional, Ronin) is a ruthless criminal who squares off against hard-hitting Ruby Rose (John Wick: Chapter 2) in a fast-paced and punishing action thriller.

Following an assignment gone wrong, traumatized ex-Marine Ali (Ruby Rose) takes a job as the doorman in a luxury New York City high-rise where her estranged family live. However, she’s soon called back into action in order to outsmart and battle a group of art thieves and their ruthless leader (Jean Reno) while struggling to protect her loved ones.
Growing increasingly desperate, the criminal gang turns ever more violent and the doorman is forced to call upon her deadly fighting skills as she heads towards an explosive showdown…

Directed by cult favourite Ryuhei Kitamura (Versus, The Midnight Meat Train), Ruby Rose follows up high-octane roles in John Wick: Chapter 2, xXx: Return of Xander Cage and Batwoman for more intense, pulse-pounding action as she squares off against Jean Reno, in his most villainous role to date.

Check out the trailer:

We have an exclusive clip too:

Enter the competition here:

a Rafflecopter giveaway

The Doorman is available now on Digital Download and on DVD on January 25th.

Buy it now: https://amzn.to/390F7Q8

Five Films to Check Out on Horror Channel This Week – 180121

horror 180121

To save you getting lockdown blues, we’re going to be giving you our picks of what to watch on Horror Channel each week. Here are some of our favourites this week:

Tuesday January 19th, 4pm – Sinbad and the War of the Furies (2016)

No, the saviour of the seven seas isn’t fighting people in fluffy animal costumes. That would be good though. Instead, we have wrestler John Hennigan (also known as Lucha Underground’s Johnny Mundo) is the titular adventurer who inadvertently unleashes a trio of beautiful but deadly ancient beings onto the world. This modern updating of the Greek legend is from The Asylum so you should know what to expect.  Also stars Jamie Bernadette (I Spit on Your Grave:  Déjà Vu).

Tuesday January 19th, 9pm – Straw Dogs (2011)

An impressive remake of the Sam Peckinpah classic still packs a decent punch. James Marsden and Kate Bosworth are the couple who fall under the sinister gaze of Alexander Skarsgård and his crew, particularly when they give a suspected child murderer sanctuary.

Friday January 22nd, 9pm – John Carpenter’s Vampires (1998)

James Woods heads a ragtag band of mercenaries in this fantastic shocker from the Horror Master. There’s plenty of gore and lots of excitement as the group travel the land slaying the undead before they get hold of a relic that will allow them to walk in daylight.

Saturday January 23rd, 9pm – Nightbreed (1990)

Directed by Clive Barker and based on his novella Cabal, this cult classic unveils the strange occupants of Midian and gives us David Cronenberg as a twisted serial killer.

Sunday January 24th, 8am – Legend (1985)

Ridley Scott’s classic fantasy is best known for the tour de force performance by Tim Curry as the imposing Lord of Darkness rather than the boyish appearance by Tom Cruise or the impressive special effects and fairy tale storytelling. Worth getting up early for!

Tune into Horror Channel on Sky 317, Virgin 149, Freeview 68, Freesat 138.

BOOK WORMHOLE: JONATHAN STRANGE & MR NORRELL – VOLUME II

Or, The One Where Jonathan Strange Goes To War And Annoys Lord Wellington. Or, even more appropriately, The Tipping Point, because this is the volume where so much changes.

When we last left off, the magician Mr Norrell had removed himself from Yorkshire to London to bring about a renaissance of English magic. We’d been introduced, briefly, to Jonathan Strange and to a number of other characters: Sir Walter Pole and his wife, Lady Pole; the beggar magician Vinculus; Norrell’s London friends and helpers Drawlight and Lascelles; Sir Walter’s servant Stephen Black; and a host of others, including the gentleman with the thistle-down hair, who is given no other name but with the information given through dialogue and footnote I can’t help but guess at his identity. We had also been left with the foreknowledge that the second volume would bring Jonathan Strange to London, to Norrell’s doorstep, and that he would become his pupil. And he does, but not because he asks, rather because Norrell does. It’s a bit surprising even though we know it’s coming, because Norrell has done everything to ensure that he is the only practicing magician in England, but that’s very much a part of it. What better way, after all, to ensure that his authority goes unchallenged than to have the only other practicing magician subordinate to him?

Norrell’s authority is a constant in both volumes of the novel, and I know it will continue into the third volume as well. It’s one of the—if not the—primary characteristics he has, and one of the first things we know about him. From the beginning of the novel, when Norrell agrees to perform magic for the York Society under the conditions that they will give up studying magic (even if they never perform it), we are told that what he wants is authority over magic. He doesn’t just want to be the best magician, he wants to be the only magician, and in order to accomplish this he will seemingly do anything, including threatening people and hording all magical knowledge for himself. Strange threatens this authority, but as I said Norrell’s taking him on as a pupil circumvents this threat, at least in his eyes. Norrell will have Strange studying until they both die, which will maintain their teacher-student relationship and allow Norrell to continue to be the authority on magic; Strange will never get a chance to grow above him (especially when Norrell keeps books that would likely facilitate this growth locked in his library in Yorkshire). As the volume progresses, it continues to be made painfully clear that Norrell is absolutely terrified of losing his position as the authority on English magic, and nothing makes this so prevalent as when Norrell agrees to persuading Strange to go to war, to prevent the possibility of Strange getting his hands on some newly-available books of magic.

Which, for someone who desires stasis, is a very stupid thing; war is never static.

In my review of Volume I, I mentioned how Clarke works with the historical period her story is set in, including having historical figures appearing within the novel alongside the fictional characters. Volume II is where she makes ample use of this, beginning right when Strange heads to Spain and the troops led by the not-as-yet Duke of Wellington. At first, Strange is useless. Wellington doesn’t want him, Strange can’t think of anything to do, and overall the army appears to not be in need of his services at all. But Strange refuses to just turn around and go back to London, and eventually is able to use his magic to aid the army. Spain, quite literally, is never the same.

It’s during his three years helping Wellington that Strange’s opinions really start to diverge from Norrell’s. They have always had differing opinions about some things (faeries and the magician the Raven King being two big ones), but for the most part Strange appeared largely content to be Norrell’s pupil. But on his own using magic outside the safety of a London sitting room, to such great purpose, Strange begins to wonder if he wouldn’t learn more away from Norrell, who seems so stifling when Strange finally returns. As I said, war is not static, and neither are the people who participate in it. Strange saw all the worst of humanity, the things we can do to each other for glory or victory or when faced with our mortality down the barrel of a gun. And Strange didn’t just observe, he did things for the sake of helping his country that made him question the sort of magic he was performing, as he “was obliged to invent most of the magic he did, working from general principles and half-remembered stories from old books”, as he did before he became Norrell’s pupil. One of the most striking images of Strange during his time in Spain is when he reanimates seventeen Neapolitan corpses. Strange watches them come to life “apparently without emotion”, altogether appearing rather nonchalant and the antithesis of the gentlemanly magician Norrell would want him to be. A portrait of Strange painted with the Neapolitans, whose enchantment lasts and who stalk Strange, begging to be returned to full life, shows what dialogue and description up until that point have not: what his experience, both with war and with magic, has done to him.

“In the picture Strange is seated on the ground. His gaze is cast down and his arms hang limp at his sides and his whole attitude speaks of helplessness and despair. The Neapolitans crowd around him; some regarding him hungrily; others have expressions of supplication on their faces; one is putting out a tentative finger to stroke the back of his hair. It is, needless to say, quite different from any other portrait of Strange.”

Even after his three years, Strange joins Wellington at Waterloo and has an experience I’m certain will be significant in the next volume. Strange is confronted by a French cuirassier on horseback, sabre raised, and “[w]ithout thinking” Strange prepares to “smash horse and horseman out of existence” with one single spell. But then, he freezes. He had told Wellington, once, that “‘[a] magician might, but a gentleman never could’” kill a man using magic, and it appears that for all that he has used magic to misdirect and frighten and raise the dead, when faced with killing a man who stands inches in front of him, Strange is a gentleman. After, “[h]e believed he wandered about in a dazed condition”, although he can’t really remember, and I’m sure that he will be faced with this again, this very human decision to having to stand there, look someone in the eye, and decide whether or not to kill them or risk himself—or someone he cares about—being killed instead.

Strange returns to Norrell, Norrell who has been occupied with the same tasks as he was years before, with the same people, living comfortably in his house in London instead of sleeping on floors and trekking through muddy fields. Norrell has remained in his desired static state, the only thing that appears to have changed being his age, and when he meets Strange he meets his worst fear: a very real, and very willing, threat to his magical authority. Who he meets is a man who embodies everything about the nickname Wellington bestowed upon him in Spain: Merlin. I found this an extremely apt nickname, and not only because Strange was a magician and Wellington the heroic knight. Geoffrey of Monmouth’s take on Merlin’s origins have him being the son of a demon (specifically an incubus) and a nun. A cruel father and a wronged mother; this is very allusive to Strange’s own origins. Merlin also worked for the betterment of Britain, like Strange, and his relationship with Wellington is very much like Merlin’s relationship with King Arthur, one of advice and aid. Wellington himself is Arthurian, a hero of Britain, and the book Reinventing King Arthur: The Arthurian Legends In Victorian Culture by Inga Bryden gives examples of this comparison having been made by Wellington’s contemporaries, such as in a political cartoon that depicts Wellington in a very Arthurian manner. Strange’s state of shock during the Battle of Waterloo is also rather allusive to the Vita Merlini, a version of Merlin’s life which has him going mad after a battle. Of course, as yet it’s not a complete comparison; Merlin is primarily defeated by a woman (Nimuë), and thus far Strange has not been defeated by anyone. But he does have a wife, Arabella, and after they first met Norrell said that “‘[m]agicians have no business marrying.’” At first I thought that this was just Norrell being Norrell, resenting any distraction in the pursuit of magical knowledge and now in his spending every waking moment with his new pupil. But now I can’t help but wonder, is it more than that? Is it foreshadowing? Is Arabella a (possibly unwitting) Nimuë?

It’s looking more and more likely the more pages pass.

Strange’s relationship with Arabella is in the background. We rarely see them alone together (although, to be fair, for a good chunk of Volume II he is away from her in Spain), and consequently we only see the typical Romantic relationship, all politeness and distance and, very much on Strange’s part, indifference. But in both their public interactions and the brief private ones were are allowed to see, I found them rather complimentary. Arabella is practical where her husband is impractical, polite where he is rude. If it weren’t for the magic he performs and the grace of his wife, Strange probably would have been kicked back to Shropshire long ago. Arabella says as much, telling Lady Pole that she has been “‘obliged to go in and rescue him before he says something he had much better not.’” She saves him, she says, and towards the end of the volume we are given a glimpse into just how much Strange actually cares about her, and at the risk of spoiling everything, it appears that Strange will get a chance to save her (although a part of me would love it if she saved herself).

Arabella needs saving for the same reason Lady Pole does, and Stephen Black. The gentleman with the thistle-down hair, who I mentioned oh-so briefly in my review of Volume I, is a character whose best description is as the villain, although I’m not quite sure it’s so simple as that. He is a faerie, one of the race that Norrell steadfastly claims magicians need not align themselves with, which is ironic because Norrell is the one who brings the gentleman with the thistle-down hair into the story to begin with.

Hypocritical Norrell; is it any wonder that I have difficulty sympathizing with him sometimes?

Norrell performed a spell early on in the novel, something more than what Strange did during the war, and employed the use of someone he claimed that he had no need of in order to accomplish it. He tried to make it without consequences, but there they were: ones that he didn’t bear but Lady Pole did. And Stephen Black. And as the novel progresses the gentleman with the thistle-down hair is becoming more prominent, and manipulating the human world more and more, and now there’s Arabella, who didn’t do anything except marry a magician and make Lady Pole her friend. The gentleman with the thistle-down hair isn’t only attracted to her, he wants to use her to get to the magicians he hates. It’s unclear at this stage whether or not he will be able to get to Norrell. As said, the Strange that returned from Spain is a man dissatisfied with his place as Norrell’s pupil, who no longer believes that it is where he is supposed to be and who is more willing to voice his contrary opinions; a Strange who threatens Norrell’s stasis, and in fact turns Norrell’s stasis against him. The new Strange has had worlds more practical experience than his teacher, and is more ready to embrace the ideas and practices Norrell rejects, and to in fact be the kind of magician that, from what we are told, is rather reminiscent of the Raven King: the inventor, the prodigy, the Greatest Magician of an Age.

The whole volume is a set up for Volume III, building on Strange and Norrell’s relationship and then, piece by piece, disagreement by disagreement, picking it apart until we are left certain that at some point they are going to clash. In Volume I, I was sure of it. They will be allies first, then enemies, the entire thing smacking of a relationship that reminds the comic book aficionado in me of Professor X and Magneto. But now, with two volumes completed and the final one begging to be read, I’m not so sure anymore. The man with the thistle-down hair has become a common antagonist for Strange and Norrell, both because of who he is and who he has hurt, and I can easily see them joining forces. Suppositions aside, however, Clarke works with this volume beautifully. Its density is sometimes a struggle, the level of detail and depth she provides to her constructed world seeming almost too much, as something in the way of the primary action you are aching to get to. Once you get to that action, however, I found that it was worth reading every lengthy footnote. This isn’t, after all, just a fantasy novel Clarke is writing, it’s an alternate history, and the richer and more detailed this world and its characters become the more you can believe that they could have existed, that in some alternate universe they did.

The entire function of the volume as a place of transition can, I think, be summed up in one single paragraph from the novel. It encapsulates every feeling and every foreshadow, and is strengthened by the richness of its speaker’s character, sending a shiver carving its way down your spine:

“Until this moment it had never seemed to him that his magicianship set him apart from other men. But now he had glimpsed the wrong side of something. He had the eeriest feeling—as if the world were growing older around him, and the best part of existence—laughter, love and innocence—were slipping irrevocably into the past.”

How right Strange is. I can’t wait to read more.

Article originally published in September 2011

[ENDED] WIN Eureka’s INNER SANCTUM MYSTERIES Starring Lon Chaney, Jr

win inner

We’ve teamed up with Eureka! Entertainment to giveaway three copies of Inner Sanctum Mysteries: The Complete Film Series, which is available on Blu-ray on January 18th.

Death, dementia, dark arts… it’s just another day in the forbidding and fascinating world of the Inner Sanctum! Get ready for unlimited thrills and chills as all six classic of Universal Pictures’ Inner Sanctum Mysteries come to Blu-ray in the UK for the first time ever! Based on the popular radio shows of the 1940’s, horror icon Lon Chaney, Jr. (The Wolf Man), gives timeless performances in six spooky feature-length films.

Calling Dr. Death (dir. Reginald Le Borg, 1943) – A doctor is not sure if he murdered his wife and has his nurse try to find the truth by hypnotising him.

Weird Woman (dir. Reginald Le Borg, 1944) – While on a trip, a professor falls in love with an exotic native woman who turns out to be a supernatural being.

Dead Man’s Eyes (dir. Reginald Le Borg, 1944) – When an artist is blinded, an operation to restore his sight depends on another person willing to donate their eyes.

The Frozen Ghost (dir. Harold Young, 1945) – A stage mentalist and a discredited plastic surgeon are involved in mysterious goings-on in an eerie wax museum.

Strange Confession (dir. John Hoffman, 1945) – Flashbacks reveal the events leading up to a man’s revenge on the racketeer who took advantage of his wife.

Pillow of Death (dir. Wallace Fox, 1945) – A lawyer in love with his secretary is suspected of suffocating his wife, among others.

Check out the trailer below and enter the competition for your chance to win a copy.

 

Enter the competition:
a Rafflecopter giveaway

INNER SANCTUM MYSTERIES: THE COMPLETE FILM SERIES starring Long Chaney Jr, a must-own collection for every classic horror fan, is OUT NOW on Blu-ray and can be purchased here https://amzn.to/35JlXfw

SPECIAL 3-DISC BLU-RAY EDITION CONTAINS:

High Definition Blu-ray (1080p) presentations of all six films. | Uncompressed LPCM monaural audio tracks | Optional English SDH subtitles | Calling Dr. Death – Audio commentary from screenwriter/film historian C. Courtney Joyner and Regina Le Borg (daughter of director Reginald Le Borg) | Weird Woman – Audio commentary from author Justin Humphreys (The Dr. Phibes Companion) and Del Howison (Dark Delicacies: Original Tales of Terror and the Macabre) | Strange Confession – Audio commentary from screenwriter Peter Atkins (Hellraiser II, III, & IV) and screenwriter/film historian C. Courtney Joyner | Kim Newman on The Inner Sanctum Mysteries – New interview with journalist, film critic, and fiction writer Kim Newman | This is the Inner Sanctum: Making a Universal Mystery Series [55 mins] | The Creaking Door: Entering The Inner Sanctum [15 mins] – History of the Radio Series with author/radio historian Martin Grams Jr. | Mind Over Matter [20 mins] – Archival interview with actor Martin Kosleck (The Frozen Ghost) | Inner Sanctum Mysteries: Radio Episodes – A selection of episodes from the original radio series | PLUS: A collector’s booklet featuring new writing on the series by Craig Ian Mann.

MONKEY SEA, MONKEY DO: THE SECRET HISTORY OF SEA-MONKEYS

Whatever American comic books you read in the seventies and eighties, you couldn’t help but come across adverts for all kinds of wacky stuff. Alongside offers to sell Grit magazine (what even was that?) door-to-door, trunks full of plastic army men, and X-ray glasses that would definitely allow you to see the girl-next-door’s private parts, was an invitation to grow your own friends. These delightful creatures, called Sea-Monkeys (obviously because they resembled the ape-like beings in the ad art, right?), would be dispatched to your door, along with everything you needed to help them thrive and survive.

What kid could resist that? What kid wouldn’t want tiny humanoids, albeit with weird tails and antennae, living in the corner of their bedroom? What kid wasn’t disappointed when what they actually received was tiny, tiny shrimps that really didn’t do anything?

The Sea-Monkeys story began in 1957 when, eager to cash in on the craze for ant farms that had exploded the year before, an intrepid inventor named Harold von Braunhut came up with the idea for ‘Instant Life’, an aquatic pet colony formed of brine shrimp.

Von Braunhut was born just plain Harold Braunhut but added the preposition to make him sound more German. You’d think that a Jewish American who had lived through the Second World War wouldn’t be so keen to play on his Germanic side, but von Braunhut wasn’t an ordinary Jewish American. He was a keen white supremacist and was looking to add distance from his Jewish roots – the Washington Post reported that he bought arms for a Ku Klux Klan faction and regularly attended the annual conference of the Aryan Nations.

Questionable politics aside, von Braunhut saw potential in his Instant Life product, and worked with a scientist named Anthony d’Agostino to develop it into a viable prospect. Essentially, the creatures that would later become Sea-Monkeys were artemia, brine shrimp that entered cryptobiosis – a dormant state that reduces biological functions to an absolute, often undetectable minimum – when they were starved of water. Von Braunhut had come across them when he visited a pet store; whilst still in cryptobiosis, brine shrimp are used as fish food, but von Braunhut reasoned that, if the cryptobiosis could be reversed in the home, the little scamps would make ideal pets. Look, we know it sounds mad, but he made millions off it, honest!

Von Braunhut and d’Agostino came up with a way to turn ordinary tap water into an artemia-friendly environment, and would-be shrimp wranglers would be sent two sachets – one containing the brine shrimp and the other containing a powder which would turn their water into brine. To ensure the shrimp would live long enough to hold the imagination, the boffins also tweaked their very DNA, creating a species – artemia nyos (after the New York Ocean Sciences lab in which they worked) – that is not found in nature. What’s more, these creatures breathed through their feet, were born with one eye and miraculously developed two more, and reproduced asexually, although there were both males and females of the species! Sales of Instant Life were steady if not spectacular, and in 1962 von Braunhut renamed his creatures Sea-Monkeys, because he figured their long tails looked like monkey’s tails.

In the early 1970s, von Braunhut decided to rebrand the pesky swimmers and enlisted the cartooning skills of comics legend Joe Orlando. Orlando created the smiling, pot-bellied humanoids that have become a staple of pop culture kitsch over the years, and von Braunhut marketed them through ads in all kinds of comic books – Marvel, DC, Archie, whatever! – to a saturation point of over three million pages of advertising a year. The ad copy promised ‘a bowl full of happiness’, and billions were sold to curious, excited, soon-to-be-disappointed children all over America.

Keen to further part children from their hard-earned, Grit-selling money, von Braunhut came up with a series of accessories and playsets. There were a range of treats for your little friends, including a ‘banana treat’, ‘red vitamins’ (containing ‘every known vitamin your Sea-Monkeys need for robust health!’), and ‘sea diamonds’. For those who wanted adventure, you could buy the Sea-Monkey Circus, Sea-Monkey Ocean Zoo, or Sea-Monkey Ski Trail. Von Braunhut was a keen motorcycle racer – he competed under the name The Green Hornet – and even developed a Sea-Monkey Speedway, but nothing could quite match the strangeness of the Sea-Monkey Fox Hunt. Yes, for just a few dollars, you too could experience the thrill of chasing a frightened animal to its death, only in the form of barely visible crustaceans!

All this grifting caught the attention of the New York State Attorney General, Louis Lefkowitz, who issued proceedings against von Braunhut on the grounds that the creatures were not actually monkeys, and thus marketing them as such was fraudulent. A judge decided in favour of von Braunhut, comparing Sea-Monkeys to sponge cakes (which do not contain actual sponge) and butterflies (which, in this reality at least, are not made of butter).

Such was the ubiquity of Sea-Monkeys that they inspired a video game in which you had to guide the Sea-Monkeys gradually away from danger, as well as appearances in such pop culture hungry TV shows like The Simpsons, American Dad, Roseanne, South Park, 3rd Rock from the Sun, and Night Court, but by far the strangest spin-off came in the form of a live-action TV show of their own.

The Amazing Live Sea-Monkeys was the brainchild of comedian Howie Mandel, who had starred in St Elsewhere and provided the voice for Gizmo in both Gremlins movies. When Mandel’s daughter became the latest pre-pubescent victim of the Sea-Monkeys craze, Mandel decided that they could be “bigger than the Ninja Turtles” and obtained the rights. In the show, Mandel played The Professor, who accidentally enlarged three Sea-Monkeys – Bill, Dave, and Aquarius – to human size, and the series followed their adventures in trying to fit into the human world. Debuting in prime time on CBS in September 1992, the show was off the air by Christmas, lasting just eleven episodes.

Sea-Monkeys were not the only thing Harold von Braunhut invented – he was also responsible for the aforementioned X-ray specs, as well as the Kitoga, a spring-loaded extendable baton for ‘self-defence’, and also promoted the act of a man who would dive from forty feet into a tub of water – but they were his most lasting creation. And, a decade after his death, they continue to thrive, although the ownership of the rights to the creatures is in dispute between von Braunhut’s widow, Yolanda Signorelli, and the toy company that licensed them. Hmm, a battle for the ownership of mutant crustaceans between a woman who starred in surreal nudey flick Venus in Furs and the ominously named Big Time Toys? Now THAT’S a movie!

[This article was originally published in STARBURST issue 455, December 2018.]

Five Films to Check Out on Horror Channel This Week – 110121

horror 110121

To save you getting lockdown blues, we’re going to be giving you our picks of what to watch on Horror Channel each week. Here are some of our favourites this week:

Tuesday January 12th, 10.50pm – The Dead 2: India (2013)

The follow-up to the Ford Brothers’ modern zombie classic shifts continent, but doesn’t lessen the intensity. It also serves as a precedent of why people should be careful entering other countries during the current pandemic, as one infected worker sparks an infestation of the undead.

Thursday January 14th, 9pm – Honeymoon (2014)

A couple’s nuptial are spoiled when a series of bizarre events. Starring Rose Leslie (who probably hasn’t lived down the “You know nothing Jon Snow” catchphrase) and Penny Dreadful’s Harry Treadaway.

Friday January 15th, 12.55am – Freaks of Nature (2015)

A group of outcasts band together when their town of humans, vampires, and zombies are pitted against each other by aliens. With a starry cast including Mackenzie Davis, Bob Odenkirk, Joan Cusack, Patton Oswalt, Vanessa Hudgens, and Denis Leary.

Saturday January 16th, 10.45pm – The Final Girls (2015)

Fun comedy horror in which the daughter of a scream queen and her friends are transported into her final film, a ‘80s slasher called Camp Bloodbath. Taissa Farmiga is as fantastic as ever.

Sunday January 17th, 6.40pm – The Body Stealers (1969)

An investigation into the disappearance mid-air of some British paratroopers uncovers an alien plot in this cult classic also known as Thin Air. The great cast includes George Sanders (Village of the Damned), the distinctive-voiced Patrick Allen, and Maurice Evans (Uncle Zaius in Planet of the Apes)

Tune into Horror Channel on Sky 317, Virgin 149, Freeview 68, Freesat 138.

Author Andy Weir Talks PROJECT HAIL MARY, THE MARTIAN, and More!

weir

Known for stranding Mark Watney on Mars in THE MARTIAN, author Andy Weir is back with another isolated, pressurised space tale, PROJECT HAIL MARY! It’ll see astronaut Ryland Grace awaken with memory loss to a confusing, save-the-world situation. Andy’s books have captured the attention of readers all over the world, with his genius sci-fi ideas even being wonderfully interpreted to the big screen by none other than Ridley Scott, and we have no doubt that PROJECT HAIL MARY will one day achieve a similar result!

How and when did the idea for Project Hail Mary come about?

After The Martian and before Artemis I worked on a novel called Zhek. I ultimately abandoned it because it just wasn’t working. However, some of the elements of Zhek were very solid, so I built a story around them. I can’t give too much away without spoiling Project Hail Mary, but several plot elements clicked together really well.

How long did it take to come together, and how did this process compare overall to any book that you’ve worked on before?

I came up with the idea slowly. Even ignoring the time spent working on and ultimately rejecting Zhek, it was still slow. There were a few things I had to work out for the story to make sense.

So, how would you describe Project Hail Mary to someone that – for some unforgivable reason – isn’t familiar with your writing just yet?

It’s a story of a lone astronaut on a desperate mission to save Earth from annihilation. Problem is: he has complete amnesia and no idea what his own name is, let alone what he’s supposed to do to save humanity.

Given that it shares similar themes to The Martian, what do you like most about isolating a story to one character, whilst putting them under immense survivalist pressure?

The story becomes much simpler when there’s only one character to focus on. As long as the character is likeable and the readers like spending time with them, you’re fine. That having been said, this differs from The Martian in several ways – the main character here isn’t fighting for his life, he’s trying to save Earth. Also, a lot of the book is flashbacks so we see this character interacting with the other characters much more often than poor Mark.

 Leading on from this, and you probably get this question a lot, but we must ask, what originally attracted you to writing stories that are set in space? What is it you just love so much about working in that setting?

I guess I’ve just always been a nerd. Space is my thing. And since I’m in to it, I’ve researched it a ton. And that leads to ideas, and so on.

What was the hardest part about putting Project Hail Mary together for you, and why?

The main character of Ryland Grace himself. When I first started writing, I didn’t have a unique or interesting personality for him. But as I wrote, his personality developed and became clearer to me. Then I went back and rewrote the earlier scenes to match the personality that came forth. It worked out well but I spent a lot of time working on the book worried that the main character was boring.

We can’t let you go without asking a couple of questions about the brilliant Artemis. Looking back, how happy are you with it still, and also, what do you remember the most about putting it together?

I’m happy with it. What I remember most about it was the tremendous research and effort I put into make Artemis itself – the city on the Moon. I worked out how to make it, how it could be financially solvent, what things would be like there, etc. I had a lot of fun doing that.

There’s an Artemis film in early production, with directors Phil Lord, Christopher Miller, and writer Geneva Robertson-Dworet already behind it. A great trio to say the least. How excited are you for that, and what would you really like to see come from the film?

I’m super excited! But I try not to get my hopes up too much. You never know with Hollywood. You can never predict if a film will get greenlighted. There are usually a bunch of factors left up to chance that have nothing to do with your story. Market activity, other films in the studio’s slate for that year, availability of the big-name performers, etc.

Also, was there anything you learnt from putting Artemis together that you maybe applied to the creative process for Project Hail Mary?

I think so. I tried very hard in Artemis to make characters with depth and complexity. Also I worked hard to make sure no one was ‘perfect’. Everyone had flaws, especially the main character Jazz. But I think I went too far. A lot of people didn’t like Jazz – they found her obnoxious and self-destructive. So for Project Hail Mary I dialled it back. Ryland is a very likeably person but I believe he also has depth. I’m still learning how to make good characters.

Finally, why should STARBURST Magazine readers check out Project Hail Mary?

Because if they don’t, I don’t get money from royalties, and that would be a tragedy!

PROJECT HAIL MARY is released May 4th from Del Rey.

[ENDED] Win a Copy of Horror Hit RELIC on Blu-ray

relic comp

 

Thanks to our good friends at Signature Entertainment, we have two copies of the fantastic horror film RELIC to giveaway. Find out more about the film and enter the competition below:

A deeply unsettling psychological horror, Relic is the unforgettable debut feature from writer and director Natalie Erika James who brings a fresh and profoundly human twist to the genre.

When elderly mother Edna (Robyn Nevin), inexplicably vanishes, her daughter Kay (Emily Mortimer) and granddaughter Sam (Bella Heathcote) rush to their family’s decaying country home, finding clues of her increasing dementia scattered around the house in her absence.

After Edna returns just as mysteriously as she disappeared, Kay’s concern that her mother seems unwilling or unable to say where she’s been clashes with Sam’s unabashed enthusiasm to have her grandma back. As Edna’s behaviour turns increasingly volatile, both begin to sense that an insidious presence in the house might be taking control of her…

Following its world premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, Relic screened to wide acclaim at BFI London Film Festival 2020. Directed by Natalie Erika James, the film features unforgettable performances from Emily Mortimer (Mary Poppins the Returns, The Party & Shutter Island), Robyn Nevin (The Matrix, Top of the Lake), and Bella Heathcote (The Neon Demon, Dark Shadows).

Special Features (exclusively on Blu-ray and on iTunes):

London Film Festival 2020 – Natalie Erika James Intro and Q&A Hosted by Michael Blyth

Interviews

Relic Shoot Timelapse

Behind the Scenes – “Lost” & “Stunts”

Check out the trailer:

 

Enter the competition here:

 a Rafflecopter giveaway

Signature Entertainment presents Relic on Digital HD January 8th and Blu-ray & DVD January 18th

Amazon Blu-ray: https://amzn.to/3b36IBn

iTunes: https://apple.co/39zjA1v

Visit our review to find out our thoughts on the film, and read our interview with its director, Natalie Erika James, to go behind the scenes.

OH MY! An Interview with GEORGE TAKEI

takei

STARBURST catches up with GEORGE TAKEI, an actor whose portrayal of Sulu in STAR TREK made him a legend and whose humanity earned him iconic status

STARBURST: There was a motto on Star Trek: live long and prosper; did you think that the show would go on as long as it has?

George Takei: Ah yes, the Vulcan greeting; live long means to go on and on and on. We are not going to live long. As you know, some of our colleagues have passed on, but they have contributed to the prosperity of Star Trek. And prosper; we have six spin-off series, we call them our children, and a seventh, Picard, starts this month, and we have the 14 feature films. That’s really a phenomenon; a TV series that was low-rated for three seasons has gone on and become this sensation of 14 major budget feature films, a wall of Star Trek books. We are also action figures. So we have lived long and prospered! I see no indication of us not continuing to do so.

After The Original Series finished, the show returned in an animated form, and you were back in that – what was that like for you?

It was not as satisfying as the live-action, because then we were there on the set together, playing scenes with each other. With the animated version, when I arrived at the recording studio, Leonard might be leaving, and I would step into the booth and do just my lines. The scene might be with Leonard or with Nichelle, but it would only be me alone with my lines highlighted. Then when I’m finished and leaving, Jimmy Doohan would be coming in, so it was not a very fun way of working.

But overall there are nothing but good memories for you with Star Trek then?

I’m very proud of my association with it, there have been stressful moments, but they go with the uplifting ones. We used to shoot into the wee hours of the morning, but some of the wonderful scenes worked beautifully. And I have fond memories of the fun episodes like The Naked Time – that episode where I, at last, get unchained from that damn helm console, and I get to take my shirt off, grab my fencing foil and demonstrate my swashbuckling prowess.

Absolutely, whenever you search classic Star Trek, that iconic image always comes up.

You went on to the movies and then actually returned in Voyager as well. Would you have liked to do more as a captain in your own series?

You know that there was this movement that began after Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country by the fans for a new TV series called Starship Excelsior with the brand new captain of the Excelsior, Captain Sulu. The Star Trek fans don’t just sit back and absorb it as entertainment, they take the show that they see as a stimulus, as inspiration, and they act on it. And one of their actions was to try to get Captain Sulu a regular TV series. But the powers that be at Paramount are deaf, dumb, and blind.

The readers of STARBURST were particularly taken with Star Trek VI – it’s a good thriller and it had a strong political message.

Exactly, yes. From the first scene when Praxis explodes, and the vibrations come through the galaxies and shake the Starship Excelsior – that explosion was inspired by what was happening in reality at Chernobyl. The explosion at Chernobyl signified the crumbling of the Soviet Union, and – onscreen – of the Klingon Empire. The David Warner character, the ambassador from the Klingon Empire, was essentially Gorbachev, coming to the west to build a rapprochement over the crumbling Soviet Union.

Yeah, it’s a very clever film, full of Shakespearean quotes and a lot of allegories. With politics, you’ve had a platform, and you’ve used it very wisely; you’ve done a lot for LGBT rights and you’ve spoken up for a lot of people that don’t have a voice or find it very difficult. You once joked about going after Devin Nunes’ seat in Congress, would that be something you’d ever really do?

Did you know the date that I posted that? April 1st. Some people didn’t get that, and they started signing cheques that we had to send back. That immediate reaction was so, so wonderful, though.

You’ve also very recently brought out a graphic novel, They Called Us Enemy, about your experience as a young Japanese American during World War II.

Yes, we were imprisoned by the United States government. I remember that morning. It was terrifying, I had just turned five years old; my parents got me up very early. They got me up, and they dressed us hurriedly. My brother and I were told to wait in the living room, and my father said they’d be doing some last-minute packing in the bedroom. And so we were just gazing out the front window, looking at the neighbourhood. Suddenly, we saw two soldiers marching up our driveway. They carried rifles with shiny bayonets. They stopped at the front porch, and they began pounding on the door; it was a terrifying sound that seemed to make the whole house tremble. My father came to answer the door, and literally at gunpoint, we were ordered out.

We were innocent Americans of Japanese ancestry. We had nothing to do with Pearl Harbour. My mother was born in Sacramento, California, my father in San Francisco. They met and married in Los Angeles, we were two generations of Americans. My grandparents were the immigrants, and they were innocent as well. And yet, we looked exactly like the people that we were at war with. We were at war with Germany and Italy also, but Italian Americans and German Americans looked like the rest of America. It was without question a racist act and a hysterical, irrational act. There was no charge, no trial. Due process, which is the central pillar of our justice system, simply disappeared. We were imprisoned in camps with barbed wire fences; I still remember that fence that combined us. High sentry towers with machine guns pointed us. When I made the night runs from our barrack to the latrine, searchlights followed me. That five-year-old me thought it was nice that they lit the way for me to pee. It’s the same experiences like that of my parents, but parallel, different stories. I wanted to tell that child’s story because I want to reach a youth readership: preteens, teens, young adults, but via the child’s account, I also led them into the larger story of the harrowing experience for my parents. But I wanted to reach young people via the comic strip format. When I was a teenager, I read comic books voraciously, and I remember retaining the information; you know at that age when you’re a teenager, you’re absorbing information through your pores. And I wanted to reach young people, while they’re still absorbing because they’re going to be the leaders of tomorrow. They’re going to be the movers and shakers of tomorrow. Some may run for public office, and I think it’s vitally important for them to know that history of the United States – a time when we reacted so irrationally, so hysterically, and in such a racist way, which is entirely contrary to what we stand for as Americans, and, if we have a populace that’s informed that way, we won’t let it occur again.

There are parallels to today…

Yes, but that is an even lower, grotesque aberration because we were always together with our parents, we were never separated. What they’re doing today is tearing away infants and putting them in filthy cages with human waste and overcrowding them, and to really underscore the evil, they’re randomly scattering them to the far reaches of the United States, far from the southern border. Also to make the situation worse, when the court orders the children be brought together with their parents, this administration is so incompetent that they can’t find the right child or the right parents to bring them together and those children’s lives have been permanently changed.

The novel is incredible, there are many things we didn’t realise about the time, and it tells the story so vividly. Although it’s distressing, it’s equally uplifting and the way that you introduce some of the childish wonders into it makes it more palatable. One thing that did come across was that your mother and father seemed incredible people. Do you feel that they live on in you, with their values?

My mother was a gutsy lady, and my father said ‘people just make mistakes’; it’s my responsibility to tell their story. That’s been my mission: to raise awareness because there are people today that I consider well-informed but when I tell them about my childhood imprisonment, they’re shocked. They’re aghast, they don’t know about it. We have a lot of glorious chapters in American history, but we don’t know about the instances where we failed our ideals. And I think we learn more from our failures than we do from the glorious chapters that we already know about. And that’s where I’m trying to fill the void, with this object lesson of the importance of people who cherish the ideals of our system to participating in a democracy.

We wish more people were as brave as you are.

Well, the Star Trek philosophy, infinite diversity in infinite combinations, I think is what we need to know more about and take into our bodies at a time like this. Our culture is universal. What happens here affects us in Southern California, what happens in China affects our economy, we live in a global society. And what we said on Star Trek was that the Enterprise was a metaphor for Starship Earth, and the strength of our starship is having the diversity of it all coming together and working in concert, as a team, and boldly going where no one has gone before.


THEY CALLED US ENEMY is available now and can be purchased HERE.

[This interview was originally published in issue 469, February 2020.]