DOUBLE FACE (1969)

double face

DOUBLE FACE (1969) / CERT: 18 / DIRECTOR: RICCARDO FREDA / SCREENPLAY: RICCARDO FREDA, PAUL HENGGE / STARRING: KLAUS KINSKI, CHRISTIANE KRÜGER, GÜNTHER STOLL / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

Sold to the German market as a krimi and in Italy as a giallo, Riccardo Freda’s Double Face has elements of both but plays mainly as a for-its-time somewhat lurid thriller. After meeting on holiday, John (Klaus Kinski) meets and marries the wealthy Helen (Margaret Lee) and the two set up home together, Helen installing John at the company she owns. John is initially blissfully happy but Helen grows bored and openly flaunts her affair with a female friend. When Helen dies in a car crash John is despondent, but soon he begins to suspect Helen didn’t die in the accident at all. Or it could be that forces are conspiring against him to drive John mad.

Double Face is a serviceable thriller, with inspired moments of direction by Freda, art design and performance to commend. Kinski in particular is great and at his most restrained here, conveying John’s desperation and turmoil with the flicker of an expression. There are some seriously dodgy special effects early in the film that serve only to damage it but it recovers to deliver a satisfying ending.

The version presented here is the full-length Italian version and it’s restored in 2K. Those flashes of brilliance from Freda, along with some gorgeous costuming and sets, have likely never appeared as sharp as they do here, with deep and rich colours. The extras kick off with a commentary from author and critic Tim Lucas. He starts off by addressing that when putting the commentary together he didn’t know what version of the film he would be commenting on as such decided on an audio essay approach rather than scene specific commentary. This actually makes for a refreshing change as Lucas has as usual done a huge amount of research and it makes this a track well worth your time.

There’s a lengthy appreciation by Lovely John of composer Nora Orlandi’s career and work on this film. In addition to this, a newly filmed and substantial interview with Orlandi herself makes this release an easy recommendation for her fans. Author and critic Amy Simmons provides us with a most enjoyable visual essay on Freda’s Gothic horrors and gialli that highlights his important place in Italian genre cinema and will have you seeking those films out (for the first time or to revisit) to explore more. Rounding out the set is an image gallery, trailers and a booklet with writing on the film by Neil Mitchell.

We wouldn’t recommend this as a starting point for exploring krimi or gialli, but for students of genre film, or Freda’s career or completists there’s much to enjoy in this release.

THE PRODIGY

THE PRODIGY / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: NICHOLAS MCCARTHY / SCREENPLAY: JEFF BUHLER / STARRING: TAYLOR SCHILLING, JACKSON ROBERT SCOTT, PETER MOONEY, COLM FEORE / RELEASE DATE: 5TH JULY (VOD), 15TH JULY (DVD)

“There’s something wrong with Miles” – After reaching his Eighth birthday, a prodigy named Miles Blume begins to exude strange behaviour that quickly becomes violent and forces his parents into a moral dilemma on what to do with him.

Directed by Nicholas McCarthy (The Pact), The Prodigy is another addition to the “Evil Kid” subgenre of Horror that exhibits moments of promise but ultimately lacks the killer originality or unpredictability that could have made it great. The story centres around Miles (Jackson Robert Scott, IT) and his mother Sarah (Taylor Schilling, Orange is the New Black) and deals with the subject of reincarnation – which is a nice change from the usual possession by a demon storyline that is ripe within modern horror.

The main issue with the film is that its too predictable and at times extremely lazy. Within the opening act, the “jump-scares” come at the audience thick and fast which waters down their impact rather than heightening them. The only true moment where a jump-scare would have worked tremendously well was unfortunately spoilt in the film’s trailer, as is the case these days.

However, on the other hand, the ruling factor that saves the film from being a complete misfire are the central performances. Scott as Miles was a brilliant piece of casting – after his compelling role as Georgie in the remake of IT in 2017, he once again proves that he has ability beyond his years. One moment you are buying him as being a sweet, innocent child before quickly hitting you with a cold glare and creepy smile which sends a shiver down your spine. Couple that with Schilling’s performance as Sarah – her execution truly enhancing the otherwise lacklustre script into a compelling family drama at the heart of a loud “crashy-bashy” affair.

McCarthy’s keen eye for atmosphere building does shine through at moments including some brilliant use of natural light to mask characters in an unsettling glow – it just sadly fails to keep any momentum going for extended periods of time.

The Prodigy contains some solid ideas for a new spin on the “possession” sub-genre but lacks any unnerving longevity with a by-the-numbers plot. The films core narrative is saved by two stellar performances by Scott and Schilling whose chemistry is undeniable and allows the audience to easily buy into their relationship.

PUPPET MASTER: THE LITTLEST REICH

Puppet

DIRECTORS: TOMMY WIKLUND, SONNY LAGUNA | SCREENPLAY: S. CRAIG ZAHLER | STARRING: THOMAS LENNON, KENNEDY SUMMERS. BARBARA CRAMPTON, UDO KIER | RELEASE DATE: JULY 8TH

Forget Avengers. Forget John Wick. The sequel the whole film world has been crying out for has arrived – Puppet Master: The Littlest Reich. This is the eleventh (!) entry in the series and a soft reboot. But what can the franchise really bring anymore? It’s only really remembered for being a slightly gory DTV original and having the first role for The Room’s Greg Sestero in one of its sequels. The ace up this version’s sleeve is that it’s scripted by S. Craig Zahler.

Zahler has made a career from drawing on the B-movie style and elevating them to films that actually have some cinematic value. He’s written and directed the brilliant western Bone Tomahawk, the Vince Vaughn car punching Brawl in Cell Block 99, and the indulgent Dragged Across Concrete, and throws the script fully into its B-movie style. It’s frequently funny, rarely misses a chance to expose a breast, features a glut of gory and over the top deaths, has a plot involving Nazis, and stars genre staples Barbara Crampton and Udo Kier, but it never reaches for more than its low hanging fruit.

After the breakup of his marriage, Edgar (Lennon) moves back in with his parents. Finding a puppet involved in a massacre in his deceased brother’s closet, he attends a convention all about the incident, which also has a puppet auction. Joined by his girlfriend Ashley (Jenny Pellicer) and coworker and friend Markowitz (Franklin), they soon find themselves wrapped up in another puppet massacre.

There’s not very much going on in The Littlest Reich, and with Zahler just on writing duties, it greatly misses his directorial skill. The cast is all game, and joined by the script with a penchant for witty lines, manage to raise a few laughs over the running time. But mostly, all the movie boils down to is a lot of deaths that are only occasionally inventive or entertaining, the standout of which will have new and soon to be parents squirming in their seats. If you’re a fan of the Puppet Master franchise, you might get a bit of a kick from this latest instalment, but most people will only find mild entertainment that soon falls from the memory.

This release has barely a puppet-sized handful of features, with a behind the scenes and making of covering much of the same ground, with the cast and production team telling you how much fun they’ve had and getting more excited about a Puppet Master film than anyone else has in a long time.

MAD DOG MORGAN (1976)

mad dog

MAD DOG MORGAN (1976) / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR & SCREENPLAY: PHILIPPE MORA / STARRING: DENNIS HOPPER, JACK THOMPSON, DAVID GULPILIL / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW (AUSTRALIA)

This often overlooked seventies gem saw Dennis Hopper appear alongside seasoned Aussie actors as an infamous real-life outlaw is an often tragic but always compelling tale. Not only did it kick-start the Australian film industry for a worldwide audience (it was the first film distributed in the US), but it unflinchingly shows how the colony would have been.

Hopper plays Daniel Morgan, an Irishman hoping to strike it rich prospecting for gold down under in the 1850s. Sent to prison for 12 years for a desperate robbery, he is brutalised, sodomised, and eventually released on parole. He becomes a feared and wanted bushranger, but one not without some compassion and pathos. With his trusted aboriginal friend Billy (Gulpilil) by his side, he robs and burns his away across the Victoria countryside pursued all the while by the local police.
Making the most of the lush locations, Mad Dog Morgan is an interesting beast of a film. Apart from the indigenous people, there are no Aussies accents to be heard – the place was populated by the colonial British and hadn’t developed its identity that we know today. Several characters speak directly into the camera at points, which gives it a documentary quality and adds to the genuine feel of the piece. Hopper is outstanding as the anti-hero Morgan. Both sympathetic and terrifying in turns. For no matter how violent Mad Dog can be, his raison d’être is more to humiliate the rich landowners than to kill. It’s an accidental shooting that tips him over the edge. The most shocking acts come from the establishment and the intolerant racist public. The opening massacre of the Chinese brothel is particularly nasty.

The film moves along at a rollicking pace – almost too fast, in fact, as some scenes are mere moments but everything comes into place and it’s nothing less than enthralling. There is also a glorious display of facial hair – some more realistic than others. Mad Dog Morgan has previously mainly been available in horrible public domain versions, but this Umbrella Blu-ray release puts that right and looks stunning. Presented in full scope, it’s bright (perhaps a little too much in places) and definition is perfect. It’s also packed with some marvellous extra features, including some insightful interviews and archival material. The interview between director Mora and Hopper is particularly enlightening, showing a completely different side to the actor than is seen in the vintage on-set footage.

A RECORD OF SWEET MURDER

record sweet

A RECORD OF SWEET MURDER / CERT: NR / DIRECTOR & SCREENPLAY: KÔJI SHIRAISHI / STARRING: JE-WOOK YEON, KKOBBI KIM, TSUKASA AOI / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

Let’s get something out of the way before we start; A Record of Sweet Murder is a thoroughly unpleasant film. That’s not a judgement on its quality, more the subject matter and unflinching, single-camera capture of some utterly nasty goings-on. Despite that – certainly not because of that – A Record of Sweet Murder is also a claustrophobic, immersive, thought-provoking experience that will stay with you beyond its dogged cruelty.

Directed by Kôji Shiraishi, a found-footage horror veteran responsible for Grotesque, Occult, and Noroi: The Curse, among others, A Record of Sweet Murder opens with an unseen cameraman – played by the director himself – filming a Korean journalist, Kim Soyeon, who introduces the set-up to camera. They have been invited to a deserted Seoul apartment building by an escaped murderer, who was a childhood friend of the journalist until an ‘incident’ saw him committed to an asylum at the age of ten. Seventeen years later, he wants to explain why he’s been killing, and Soyeon wants the story.

Set mostly in a grimy, abandoned apartment lit in a natural, almost dim manner, the plot unfolds with a great deal of talking and some explosive, bloody action. Yeon Je-wook as murderer Park Sang-joon is a tight, focused ball of intensity; his faith in the mission he’s been given from God utterly persuasive and disturbingly logical. Kim Kkotbi’s Soyeon is equally convincing, as she is forced to confront some very real horror which chips away at her unwillingness to believe Sangjoon can be responsible for his crimes.

The piece takes a turn part-way through, with the nastiness amping up with the arrival of two further characters who, without resorting to spoilers, are simultaneously exactly and not at all what Sangjoon has been waiting for. The violence, and some sexual assault, is not an easy watch but never feels gratuitous or prurient.

There is a genre element to the story which isn’t immediately apparent, and the film is a rewarding experience; an emotional ride with fixated people stuffed into a small space. This is a record not only of sweet murder(s), but also of some very disturbed individuals, and an engrossing watch.

AMERICAN HORROR PROJECT VOL. 2

horror project

AMERICAN HORROR PROJECT VOL. 2 / CERT: 18 / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

Arrow Video’s valiant attempt to shine a light on some neglected gems of genre cinema returns with three films that share little in common outside of falling broadly into the horror genre. Curated by the esteemed writer Stephen Thrower, each is, however, an example of the creativity rampant in 1970s America.

The first selection is John Hayes’ Dream No Evil (1970), a melancholy and moody study of the scars of childhood, parental abandonment, psychosis and a murderous religious fever. Starting slow and understated it builds as part proto-slasher, part waking nightmare to an inevitable, powerful conclusion. Next is Martin Goldman’s Dark August (1976), a restrained rural horror that follows Sal, a city dweller relocated to the Vermont countryside who accidentally kills a young girl in his car. As grief stricken and morbid as Sal has become since, it’s nothing compared to the girl’s grandfather, who places a curse on Sal and summons a demon to punish him. If that sounds gory or cheesy, it’s absolutely neither, instead framing the supernatural resolutely in otherwise mundane reality and all the better for it. Swamped in grief, foreboding and Sal’s guilt it’s gripping, intelligent and beautifully made.

If you’re hankering for something a little more garish this set serves that up with the third title, Robert Voskanian’s The Child (1977). This reviewer found its tale of a homicidal young girl and her gang of graveyard zombie killers beyond grating but Thrower loves it, so you might too.

Print qualities vary, but it’s safe to say all of these titles have never been presented in better shape. The Child comes out the worst, but it enhances part of any of the grindhouse charm it has. On the other hand, Dark August is resplendent. Each film comes with a personal appreciation by Thrower explaining why he feels the films are worthy of rediscovery. Thrower is as erudite a person as one could find on the subject of horror and as such, all are vital. Commentaries are available for all three films, the first by Kat Ellinger and Samm Deighan, the other two with each film’s director (and for The Child, its producer as well). Highlights are Thrower’s video essay on the films of Hayes leading up to Dream No Evil, Stephen R. Bisette’s history of Vermont’s genre filmmaking and an audio interview with Rue McClanahan on her numerous films with Hayes.

The extras are rounded out by a variety of interviews, trailers, and a 60-page booklet with writing on the films. It’s a fascinating package for a set of films deserving of a second life and if you have an interest in the less well-trodden road of ‘70s American horror, you’re unlikely to be disappointed.

ESCAPE PLAN 3

Escape Plan 3

DIRECTOR: JOHN HERZFELD | SCREENPLAY: MILES CHAPMAN | STARRING: SYLVESTER STALLONE, DAVE BAUTISTA, 50 CENT, JIN ZHANG, DEVON SAWA, JAIME KING, MELISE | UK RELEASE DATE: JULY 5TH (LIMITED THEATRICAL), AUGUST 26TH (HOME VIDEO)

After Arnold Schwarzenegger fled the Escape Plan franchise following the first film, shrewdly eluding its horrendous sequel, the series looked set to detonate, but Stallone and cine-brickhouse David Bautista have returned once again, in a second follow-up that’s astonishingly often enthralling. Director/co-writer John Herzfeld (Two Days in the Valley) injects a fitting realism and flays the sci-fi vibe, while his script, co-written with the original’s scribe Miles Chapman, is sharper, faster, less bombastic, but much more dramatic than its predecessors.

The story sees the daughter of a Chinese billionaire, Daya Zhang (Melise), kidnapped by the psychotic son of her former business associate. Daya’s kidnapper plants a data-stick inscribed with prison escapist Ray Breslin’s (Stallone) name, in the pocket of her unconscious bodyguard. The contents of which find their way to Breslin and lead him to Dervaniški, Belarus where Trent DeRosa (Bautista) and Daya’s ex-bodyguard Shen (Jin Zhang) plan a breakout to spring both Zhang and Breslin’s recently kidnapped girlfriend Abigail (King) from a giant ramshackle fortress.

The script’s tight set-up presents intriguing new scenarios and secondary characters who are more than just 2D targets to be shot in the backdrop. As the story unravels, so do their connections. Even the psychotic antagonist’s origins stem from the previous films’ backstories, making him motivated by more than just money and power. EP3 is also augmented by sub-plots linking lost loves with personal vendettas which enrich the script with a compound structure and constantly changing character dynamics. While these intricacies service the story, their internal conflicts are not efficiently extrapolated to heighten the drama and emotional arcs. But at the end of the day, this is an Escape Plan sequel, and anything other than bombastic dross is a bonus.

Instead of the previous entries’ ‘90s sci-fi pop noir and subtle cyberpunk vibe, recalling the likes of Freejack, Split Second, Strange Days, and No Escape, this movie is grounded with russet tenors and burnt umber hues evoking the likes of Richard Stanley’s Hardware and Dust Devil, along with bone-cracking violence. This includes Stallone stabbing a pole through the back of someone’s face, Bautista obliterating henchmen with a massive rocket shotgun, and a pitiless cell set punch-up between Breslin and a stooge, which shows Stallone doing what he does best, punching flunkies into artery-clotting thug pâté.

Where the Schwarzenegger shaped crater at the heart of Escape Plan 2 was patent, Bautista does better here as Stallone’s cohort than previously, but he isn’t imperative to this sequel’s success. While it’s refreshing to see Bautista get the stuffing knocked out of him by an equally juggernaut-sized ruffian during a face-slamming fight scene, there is little effective suspense. Yet tension buds during edgy interrogations and the plot flutters by swiftly enough to pay no mind to the sometimes trite dialogue. Aside from decent performances and well-woven backstories,  EP3 works better, surprisingly, stripped of its sci-fi fetters, as a straight up prison rescue thriller. While it’s far from ground-breaking and occasionally stammers, this second sequel frequently soars and kicks ass where it counts.

CHARLIE SAYS

Charlie

DIRECTOR: MARY HARRON | SCREENPLAY: GUINEVERE TURNER | STARRING: HANNAH MURRAY, SUKI WATERHOUSE, ANNABETH GISH, MATT SMITH | RELEASE DATE: JULY 29TH

The director of American Psycho tackles one of the country’s most infamous in Charlie Says, documenting the lives of three women in Charles Manson’s hippy commune. The story hooks up with ‘Charlie’ in the months and days prior to his followers’ crimes, as a manipulative, charismatic aspiring musician building a small cult of damaged followers craving his attention. And, oh, the things they will do to secure Charlie’s favour.

For all the screentime Matt Smith’s Charles Manson gets, this film truly belongs to Leslie Van Houten, Patricia Krenwinkel and Susan Atkins – the three disturbed young women caught up in Charlie’s bullshit. Whether they deserve the spotlight, however, is a different matter entirely. Guinevere Turner’s script (inspired by caseworker Karlene Faith’s memoirs) explores the why rather than the what, following newest recruit Van Houten (Game of Thrones’ Hannah Murray) as she falls under Charlie’s thrall. By necessity, we’re asked to sympathise with the devils; confused individuals, exploited and abused by a charismatic, self-serving monster.

This angle is a rare direction of approach for a biopic on this particular psychopath, with its director well-suited to the subject matter. Like her Patrick Bateman, Harron’s Charles Manson is depicted as a seductive idiot; an imbecile with a thesaurus and a knack for honing in on the vulnerable. Smith is surprisingly restrained as Manson, resisting the urge to go larger-than-life or lean into the beast’s mannerisms.  And yet still, Charlie Says is disappointingly superficial, lacking a handle on its characters’ inner workings. Van Houten, particularly, is difficult to read, and the film feels as though it is grasping at straws every time it asks for us to sympathise with her, or believe in a sense of inner conflict that nobody really knows was there or not.

Far more successful is the film’s other timeline, set after the Manson murders, with the three women dealing with the fallout of their crimes in a prison block together. This does away with the camp theatricality of life in the Manson compound (done better in Mandy anyway) and hones in on the aftermath, where the real insight is to be garnered. Charlie Says is more thoughtful and even-handed than most Manson family biopics out there (ranging from the disrespectful Haunting of Sharon Tate to the downright repulsive Wolves at the Door), bringing a balance that many will claim its subjects simply do not deserve. It’s a similar route as taken by the recent Extremely Wicked, Shockingly Evil and Vile, made more effective by a trio of commanding performances and well-documented case histories. It’s commendable that we’re getting another perspective on the matter, but there’s no hiding from the fact that forty years later, the world is still hanging on every word that Charlie says.

 

 

KRULL

KRULL

KRULL / CERT: PG / DIRECTOR: PETER YATES / SCREENPLAY: STANFORD SHERMAN / STARRING: KEN MARSHALL, LYSETTE ANTHONY, FREDDIE JONES, FRANCESCA ANNIS  / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW (AUS)

Nostalgia is a hell of a drug. Krull is one of those films from the youth of those of a certain age – a certain age that is the key demographic for genre re-releases. In the thirty-six years since its release, and subsequent proliferation through the VHS boom of the mid-1980s, a warm glow has surrounded this and other films of its type. But let’s cut through the nostalgic fog: Krull is an awful movie.

At least until the emergence of The Asylum, Hollywood has always been slow to pick up on popular culture trends. So it is that the craze for sword and sorcery novels and comic books of the 1970s didn’t translate to the big screen until 1980’s Hawk the Slayer, which opened the floodgates for a slew of similar pictures, with Conan the Barbarian, Beastmaster and Deathstalker following quickly behind.

Krull was something of an oddity. Sold to Columbia pictures by the presumably artistically-focused Barclays Mercantile Industrial Finance production company, it featured an almost wholly British cast, and was shot at Pinewood Studios as well as on location in Italy. The production was fraught with issues – director Peter Yates apparently hated working on the film so much that he took a three week holiday in the Caribbean during filming – and it racked up a huge (for the time) cost of $30 million (the same year’s Return of the Jedi cost just $2.5 million more). On release, the movie took just $16.5 million, and was panned by the critics, with Siskel and Ebert giving it the much-unwanted two thumbs down.

Krull is the story of a prince and a princess who are to be married to unite the planet Krull against the alien invaders of the Beast. The Beast, however, has other plans, and uses his army of reptilian and insectoid Slayers to abduct the princess, leaving the prince gravely wounded. The appearance of Ynyr, the forgotten one, saves the prince and kicks off the search for the princess and the battle to rid Krull of the Beast.

This entails the protagonists being put through a number of action set-ups (including that old childhood fear, quicksand!) as they gather a merry band of ne’er-do-wells to take the fight to evil. Amongst the cast of heroes are veteran British actors Freddie Jones, John Welsh, David Battley, and Bernard Bresslaw, who can be relied on for performances that are at once both uninterested and overacted. The younger cast – with a pair of notable exceptions – are much better value, with Alun Armstrong’s Torquil one of the film’s few sympathetic characters, as the leader of a gang which also includes Liam Neeson, Robbie Coltrane, and Todd Carty.

With so much weight in the supporting cast, Ken Marshall’s Prince Colwyn and Lisette Anthony’s Princess Lyssa shouldn’t have too much to do to win the audience over, yet they fail even at that, although Anthony suffered the indignity of being dubbed in post-production and can’t be held entirely to blame. Marshall, however, whose post-Krull highlight was a short run in Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, is rotten on his own terms, with no-one else to blame.

Krull is fondly remembered among people of a certain age, but the memory can play cruel tricks. Re-watching the movie, however lovely the transfer to Blu-ray may be, reveals a flimsy quest pic, full of wooden acting, laughable effects, and an almost complete lack of drama, both from the absence of peril and from a lack of sympathetic characters. It’s not a total waste of time, but that time could be spent much better in a thousand other places on a thousand other worlds.

EXTRAS: Journey To Krull featurette / Marvel Comics adaptation

ESCAPE ROOM (2019)

ESCAPE ROOM (2019) / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: ADAM ROBITEL / SCREENPLAY: BRAGI F. SCHUT, MARIA MELNIK  / STARRING: DEBORAH ANN WOLL, TYLER LABINE, TAYLOR RUSSELL, LOGAN MILLER, NIK DODANI, JAY ELLIS / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

A group of six strangers are brought together by a mysterious invite to an Escape Room – but the group have to quickly put their petty differences aside in order to survive a seemingly innocent game that turns deadly.

Escape Rooms are all the rage nowadays – every city seems to have one and every year we seem to get a movie based on the group puzzle activity (this film is not to be confused with Escape Room (2017) which is on Netflix right now). With that being said in order to stand out from the plethora of copycats, one must bring something new and fresh to the table – however, this particular set of rooms does not accomplish that.

From the start, none of the characters are relatable and are incredibly stereotypical – the nerd, the jock, the old guy, the geek, the loser and the war veteran. The dialogue when this ragtag group first meet in the lobby of the Escape Room sets the unfortunately lazy tone of the movie including the jock character (whose name is as forgettable as the rest of the victims) insults the nerd by saying he has “sexual relations” with “real human women”. Essentially, the audience is rooting for the obviously evil corporation behind these twisted traps instead of the “protagonists” of the story.

The only true redeeming factor of the film is the design and implementation of the rooms themselves. Easily the best room takes place in an upside-down bar that requires our heroes to use their brains to solve puzzles whilst also using their physical abilities to prevent falling to their demise. This particular room is beautifully shot as well which demonstrates that Robitel and his DOP clearly have a keen eye for making an engaging movie – but this falls victim to a very weak script with a predictable twist and wooden characters.

After the lacklustre ending, we are presented with pure sequel bait which unfortunately is the norm in today’s modern horror landscape but does open the door for more interestingly designed rooms in a future instalment (the only positive to hang on too).

Escape Room (2019) fails to really add anything interesting to this twisted torture sub-genre of Horror but still manages to be watchable at best. The design and execution of a majority of the rooms which at least keeps the audience engaged for its runtime – something that the script fails to do in a major way.

Special Features:

The special features on the Blu-Ray disc version of the film are the generic extras that one would normally find for a film of this ilk and therefore add nothing to make it worth forking out money for the home disc release.

  • GAME, SETS, MATCH [4:55] – A behind the scenes look the production design that went into creating Escape Room and how they approached making each room.
  • THE LONE SURVIVORS [4:19] – Interviews with the Director, Producers and Cast about the characters that are presented in the movie.
  • DELETED SCENES [19:02] – A selection of deleted scenes including an Alternate Opening and Ending.
  • WILL YOU EVER [1:58] – Interviews with Cast and the Director about if they would do Escape Rooms after making the movie.