QUANTUM LEAP: THE COMPLETE COLLECTION

Quantum Leap Complete Collection

Quantum Leap finally makes its long awaited and well-deserved Blu-Ray debut in this handsome box set comprising all five seasons.

For those new to the show, Quantum Leap was a time travel series with a difference that was shown on BBC 2 at 9:00 on Tuesday nights, debuting in early 1990. It was never a glitzy, technobabble-spouting, special effects showcase but instead was a quirky little show that very quickly garnered a cult audience.

Quantum Leap is a time travel project headed by Sam Beckett, played by a pre-Star Trek: Enterprise Scott Bakula. In his impatience to test the project, he uses himself as a guinea pig and finds himself travelling through time. If it sounds pretty formulaic as a standard U.S. sci-fi TV show so far, that’s where the similarities end.

Beckett can only move backwards through his own timeline, thus can never go further than his own birth date. Whatever time he lands in, he inhabits the body of someone in that time. Believe it or not, our favourite Time Lord wasn’t the first time traveller to change genders. Nor ethnicity.

Wherever he ends up, he encounters a person needing help, or a situation that needs to be corrected. Some of the stories are big, many are small but ingeniously subtle. These twists are often not apparent until near the show’s end. It might be unwittingly summoning the police to the Watergate Hotel in the early seventies, or suggesting a small change to a farmer named Buddy Holly that inspired him to write Peggy Sue, or even, topically, as a cab driver in the fifties, mentioning to a fare that real estate in New York could make him a fortune in years to come, thus inspiring the rise of Donald Trump.

Beckett moves from time to time, body to body, helping everyone from Mach 2 test pilots to civil rights campaigners, aided and advised by Al Calavicci (Dean Stockwell), who only appears to Sam as a hologram. The hope is, of course, that each leap will be the final one that brings Sam home to his own time and body.

As we’ve mentioned, it’s not an effects-laden show, nor is it a hard science lesson. Ultimately, it’s a gentle, feel-good show that’s both dramatic and in its own way inspirational and moralistic without being heavy-handed and overly message-laden. The conversion to Blu-ray is an eye-opener, as the show is more vivid than ever. The camerawork is exceptional, and the colours rich and sharp. Watching the show on hi-def, it’s actually hard to believe that the pilot episode is only a couple of years away from its 30th anniversary, it really has aged that gracefully and well.

QUANTUM LEAP: THE COMPLETE COLLECTION / DIRECTOR: VARIOUS / WRITER: VARIOUS / STARRING: SCOTT BAKULA, DEAN STOCKWELL / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

2047: VIRTUAL REALITY

Virtual Reality 2047

Think Blade Runner combined with… well, more Blade Runner. It is an unavoidable fact that French director Guy-Roger Duvert’s first feature film borrows heavily from Ridley Scott’s timeless sci-fi heavyweight, and not just in its cyberpunk aesthetic. Businesses controlling the experience of being (or not being) human, a lead character with skeletons in his closet and some serious philosophical probing all feature heavily in 2047: Virtual Reality, unapologetically harking back to one of the jewels of contemporary science-fiction.

And much like Scott’s film, 2047 manages to make you think. It’s a provoking investigation of internet security and political game-playing that leaves you with thoughts long after the film finishes. It follows a chapter in the life of one man as he finds himself a piece in a dangerous game being played by the corporations, the government and internet terrorists, all of whom want control over a human population who spend most of their time online in the virtual world.

In the tradition of Netflix’s Black Mirror, 2047 focuses on a technology that already exists and has taken off in recent years – virtual reality. The moments in the real world have a stinging contrast to the fantastical simulations or ‘verses’ as they are called. It is the actions of those few left in the real world that bears heavily on the plot and provides you with the most opportunities for a bit of soul-searching.

However, 2047 fails to really impress. The moments where main character Nash (a chiselled, spirit-glugging Mike Dupod) is in the virtual world feel inconsequential. The escapade where Nash takes over the body of a woman, in particular, feels very far-fetched; a shallow combination of desert warfare and robots that don’t clearly tie in with the main story until its last moments. Efforts are not made to make the technological equivalent of waking up and realising it’s a dream engaging enough.

None of the actors put in a terrible showing, but the performances are as unmemorable as the characters. For a film with some impressive and beautiful shots of the neon-lit future, it’s astonishingly unengaging. There is nothing to make you sit up and take notice. There is no Roy Batty or moving rain-soaked monologue here. You are instead left with a slight headache as you try and keep up with who everyone is working for, a conundrum that overshadows any ethical debates brought up during the story.

Being so closely related to another film also means that 2047 cannot really be seen as anything new. Before long, this futuristic science fiction treat ends up feeling crusty and stale. The surface-level aesthetics and interesting themes are not enough to stop this flying car scraping along the pavement.

2047: VIRTUAL REALITY / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: GUY-ROGER DUVERT / SCREENPLAY: GUY-ROGER DUVERT / STARRING: MIKE DUPOD, JANE BADLER, JOCHEN HÄGELE, MAXIMILIEN POULLEIN, KAYA BLOCKSAGE / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE

Kingsman: The Golden Circle

2015’s Kingsman: The Secret Service was an absolute riot of a film. Playing like a suave, sleek, action-packed, foul-mouthed offspring of the James Bond pictures of yesteryear, the adaptation of Mark Miller and Dave Gibbons’ much-loved comic book instantly became a huge favourite of many a genre fan. And now, the follow-up to that picture – Kingsman: The Golden Circle – has landed on Blu-ray and DVD.

Plot-wise, the action picks up with Taron Egerton’s Eggsy at the very top of his game, now fully immersed in the elite world of the Kingsmen. That’s not to say he’s forgotten his roots, of course, for Eggsy is still equally at home chilling out with his mates as he is saving the world. As it so happens, it’s yet another world-saver that’s required from him here. This time out, Julianne Moore’s insta-grinning Poppy Adams is the threat. While she could easily have been pulled straight off the set of Happy Days, Poppy isn’t quite as well meaning as her chirpy demeanour would have you believe, for she heads up the nefarious Golden Circle drug cartel. Like any good villain, she has her sights set on global dominance – this time by trying to force the President of the United Sates to grant her and her cohorts immunity in their trade of choice – and it’s down to Eggsy and Co. to team with their American counterpart, Statesman, to save the day.

In terms of tone and narrative, Kingsman: The Golden Circle very much follows its predecessor. The humour is intelligent yet ballsy, the action intense and never afraid to be brutal, and the performances of the film’s key players are all absolutely pitch-perfect for what is required. Bringing the Statesman organisation to the fore also works splendidly, with the initial yeeha cowboy element of the group meshing brilliantly with the bullish British attitude of Eggsy and Mark Strong’s Merlin – two of the last few surviving Kingsmen after Poppy makes the majority of the organisation go “boom!”. Pedro Pascal and Channing Tatum completely nail it as two of Statesman’s finest, while Halle Berry is great as their resident tech whizz, and Jeff Bridges is as cool as they come as the group’s head.

For the villain of the piece, Julianne Moore has never been so terrifying! While she may initially seem like she spends her days baking apple pies and jiving around her kitchen, that pleasant and pleasing sheen goes out of the window as soon as some poor soul is put through her mincer and cooked up as a juicy burger. Making this all the more sinister, Moore barely ever the takes the smile off her face or the spring out of her step.

Make no mistake about it, The Golden Circle is a fresh, vibrant effort that both pulls plenty from the first movie while similarly not being afraid to veer off in its own path. On that front, director Matthew Vaughn and co-writer Jane Goldman deserve ample credit, and this truly feels as if they took all that made 2015’s Kingsman great and turned it up to 11. Egerton is again as charming as ever as rascal-done-good Eggsy, and we see a slightly more mature and softer side to him here in how he’s now shacked up with Princess Tilde (Hannah Alstrom) – the Swedish royalty he rescued at the end of the first picture. Then we couldn’t not address the return of Colin Firth as Harry Hart. Yes, we were a tad miffed, too, when all of the trailers for The Golden Circle showed Harry back from the dead following his demise in the first film, but his reappearance is actually handled rather wonderfully in The Golden Circle.

If there’s one major complaint about this sequel, it’s the runtime. The action and energy of the film never massively wanes, but it does feel as if The Golden Circle would’ve been best served by losing 20 minutes or so of its excessive 2 hours 20 minutes runtime. In fairness, the length is only 10 minutes more than the first movie, but it’s a lot more noticeable at certain points here. All in all, though, this is a fun, ferocious follow-up to one of the most enjoyable films of recent years, and we can only hope that Eggsy et al are back for a third outing at some point down the line.

Special Features: Ten featurettes / Kingsman Archives

KINGSMAN: THE GOLDEN CIRCLE / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: MATTHEW VAUGHN / SCREENPLAY: JANE GOLDMAN, MATTHEW VAUGHN / STARRING: TARON EGERTON, MARK STRONG, SOPHIE COOKSON, JULIANNE MOORE, CHANNING TATUM, HALLE BERRY, PEDRO PASCAL, JEFF BRIDGES, COLIN FIRTH / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

VISITORS (2003)

visitors

Radha Mitchell was always a Neighbours alumnus destined for bigger things, and following her stint on Ramsay Street she’s been one of its more notable ex-members. Like Guy Pearce, she has carved out a career in both high-brow and low-rent fare, and this 2003 curio from her native Australia has now been reissued on DVD by the redoubtable Umbrella Entertainment.

Ostensibly it’s the story of a young woman suffering cabin fever, having been becalmed while attempting to sail single-handed around the world, but although it sells itself on the horror of her hallucinations, most viewers looking for something to send chills down the spine will probably end up disappointed. Rather, this is more of a psychological thriller, the demons being exorcised those internal ones that Georgia Perry has been suffering since accidentally causing the incident that cost her father his legs during her childhood.

It’s a tale of two halves, much of the opening section painting in Perry’s background through flashback during the early part of her involuntary intermission. It’s an effective way to fill in the audience without labouring the exposition, although things do pick up in the latter portions which focus on her illusory visitations and what they have to say about her state of mind. Part of which is down to her relationship with Luke (Purcell), with whom she conducts regular radio conversations that end up contributing no end to the cycle of visions that beset her. But mostly Perry’s mindset is informed by her decision to embark upon the voyage at a time when she’s at risk of losing both of her parents while she’s at sea.

This isn’t a whole lot of fun, the only comedy coming from Perry’s regular conversations with her onboard cat which are as reminiscent of Doug Liman’s Go as they are of Alien or Wilson the volleyball from Cast Away. However the acting is terrific, not least from Susannah York as Perry’s suicidal mother and Ray Barrett as her much more easy-going father, and Mitchell herself holds the centre of the film quite comfortably, never giving in to the temptation to indulge in the kind of acting pyrotechnics that might have rendered this hysterical.

Visitors was written by Everett De Roche, and while it’s a lesser credit than some of his better-remembered productions, it’s easy to see the influences that created Road Games and Long Weekend behind it. It’s also the final directorial credit for Road Games’ Richard Franklin, who lends it an air of uncluttered classiness that befits a film that dwells far more on the games a mind can play than it does over-embellishing the manifestation of those fantasies. Not the most striking or memorable film, but effective nonetheless.

Extras: trailer, photo galleries, biographies

VISITORS (2003) / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: RICHARD FRANKLIN / SCREENPLAY: EVERETT De ROCHE / STARRING: RADHA MITCHELL, SUSANNAH YORK, RAY BARRETT, DOMINIC PURCELL, TOTTIE GOLDSMITH / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW (AUSTRALIA)

FLAY

flay

Flay is a ghost story in which a sister (Ella LaMont) and brother (Dalton E. Gray) are plagued by haunted paint. Whilst that sounds ludicrous, the film, itself, isn’t nearly as interesting. Many scenes involve both literally and figuratively watching paint dry.

Whilst the siblings being plagued by a mysterious, malevolent entity after losing their mother is a solid set-up, it never amounts to anything more than seemingly endless soap-opera arguments between the two. Watching it feels like being caught in front of a family argument whilst visiting your friend’s house. It’s not particularly entertaining; it’s just sort of awkward and you’d like to leave.

The film was inspired by both Japanese and Native American folklore, which would have made for a nice spin on the usual proceedings, but it never manifests as anything other than an exposition dump at the start. As such, the closest thing to a fresh and original idea in the film is that the ghost occasionally takes the form of what would appear to be a conscious, but legally-safe rip-off of Slender Man. This might have been noteworthy if it were the first film to make use of the character, but it’s a few years late for that.

That said, plenty of great ghost stories exist without a shred of originality to them. More often than not, the make of a good horror film is in the execution rather than the concept. Marking the directorial debut of Eric Pham (who cut his teeth as a visual effects artist on a number of Robert Rodriguez films), you’d be forgiven for expecting something a little bit more stylish and accomplished than Flay, which, sadly, suffers from almost absurdly bland direction. Much like the canvases featured throughout the film, the whole thing is completely flat.

At no point in the film does any sense of artistry enter the equation. In lower budget films, you’ll often find more care and consideration put into them because the people working on them are there for reasons other than money. In higher budget films, you’ll find the best care and consideration that money can buy. Flay seems to have been produced within an awkward space of having a little bit of money to spend but only being able to hire professionals completely lacking in emotional investment for the project.

Perhaps most damning of all is that for a film directed by a visual effects supervisor, the visual effects are pathetic. The few practical effects dotted around are passable, but the majority of the film relies on digital trickery and the results are less impressive than a Snapchat filter.

At one point in the film, the ghost reaches its hand menacingly out of a puddle of spilt milk. A few more moments like that might have earned the project a place as midnight-screening fodder of the so-bad-its-good variety, but the film is far too dull and uninteresting for the majority of its runtime which is largely made up of scenes of family bickering.

FLAY / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: ERIC PHAM / SCREENPLAY: MATTHEW DALEY / STARRING: VIOLETT BEANE, ELLE LAMONT, A. MICHAEL BALDWIN / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW (US), TBC (UK)

DRAGON BALL Z MOVIE COLLECTION FIVE: THE BROLY TRILOGY

broly trilogy

Dragon Ball Z Movie Collection Five: The Broly Trilogy stands out among the recent releases of the Dragon Ball Z movies. It is the second such collection with a theme based on a villain that appears in all of its movies (in this case, Broly). It is also the only collection of the six that includes three movies (the other five only assembling two features a piece).

Broly the Legendary Super Saiyan introduces the villain and sets much of the tone for the set as a whole. Broly vastly overpowers the rest of the cast, and this will turn out to be true for the other two movies as well.

One thing that makes this movie stand out is its mystery. Although Broly went on to become a largely recognised figure in Dragon Ball Z, the movie itself takes its time in getting to his reveal. A Saiyan shows up claiming to have made a new planet Vegeta. Getting to the bottom of his claim, and learning the truth to his motives provides a sense of intrigue to the film that earlier films in the series rarely attempted. Broly’s main flaw comes in his motivation for attacking the main characters. It doesn’t quite work, but thankfully it is easily ignored and it doesn’t detract from the action.

Broly – Second Coming is set during the time in Dragon Ball Z in which Goku had died and left the planet. Goku’s absence, and the smaller number of characters in this movie ramp up the tension. Since Goku isn’t to hand, Broly – Second Coming focuses largely on Goten, Trunks, and Videl. The issues surrounding Broly’s motivations don’t affect this film as much as they affected its predecessor, and the fight against Broly just as desperate, if not more so than last time. It also fleshes out Broly’s Super Saiyan form some more, building up to his now iconic transformation rather than going directly to it, adding to the movie’s sense of tension and successfully raising the stakes of the battle.

Bio Broly has more in common with Broly – Second Coming than with the first movie. Goku is still gone, so Goten and Trunks serve as the protagonists again. They are backed up by Android 18 and Mr. Satan. Android 18 adds to the action scenes, and Mr Satan provides the sort of comic relief that fell on Master Roshi or Oolong in earlier instalments.

In regards to Broly himself, this movie is something of an outlier. As the movie’s title suggests, he isn’t quite Broly and he spends most of his third appearance with a vastly different look. He is still intimidating but the character lacks the elements that made him stand out before.

Dragon Ball Z Movie Collection Five: The Broly Trilogy maintains a consistent quality throughout the films on offer. The latter two movies give a welcome chance for characters other than Goku to shine, and at his best Broly comes off more akin to a force of nature than a person. Each film in the series differs slightly in terms of their set up, and all of them have something to offer. Sadly, there is no commentary available this time, but this collection still manages to be a strong offering for fans.

Extras: Trailers, Japanese audio, US audio with Japanese music.

DRAGON BALL Z MOVIE COLLECTION FIVE: THE BROLY TRILOGY / CERT: PG / DIRECTORS & SCREENPLAY: VARIOUS / STARRING: SEAN SCHEMMEL, VIC MIGNOGNA, KYLE HEBERT, KARA EDWARDS, LAURA BAILEY / RELEASE DATE: FEBRUARY 12TH

POKÉMON THE MOVIE: I CHOOSE YOU!

pokemon

Pokémon the Movie: I Choose You! is a retelling of the Pokémon anime’s earliest season. There are a few scenes that will be familiar for older fans, but most of the movie concerns itself with an original plot.

This is for the best. Not every call back to the original show is bad; fighting off the flock of spearow, and saving Charmander both hit with their original emotional resonance. On the other hand, Team Rocket’s presence is entirely superfluous. Their scenes do little to add to the movie beyond being something for already established fans to recognise.

Thankfully, Pokémon the Movie: I Choose You! doesn’t shoehorn in too many characters from the original show. Brock, and Misty have been replaced by Verity, and Sorrel. Charmander’s trainer, Damian, has been remade into Cross and he plays a bigger role in the movie than he did the series. These characters all get moments that explore their motivations, and the movie does enough to flesh them out as characters. The decision to include a fresh cast of supporting characters instead of old favourites is a wise one, as it allows the audience to enjoy the new characters whereas newer versions of familiar faces would have spent most of the movie competing with themselves.

While occasionally a scene will digress from the main plot, there is a narrative thread to link most of the movie together. This thread comes together in the pay-off but it doesn’t always work in the details along the way. There is a scene in which Ash reacts to a setback in a way that doesn’t feel true to the character. Even within the context of the movie, presenting a new version of Ash his reaction feels like too much of a leap to the situation, and the movie could have done a better job of explaining why Ash reacts in that fashion. This scene is saved by the quality of the scenes that followed and the way that it foreshadows events that take place later in the movie.

Pokémon the Movie: I Choose You! takes the essence of the original Pokémon anime, and repackages it. While the little nods to the series that inspired it are fun, the movie is at its best when it is using the themes of its predecessor to tell its own story rather than the moments which essentially sell fans more of the same with a fresh coat of paint. Some of the specific details of the plot fall flat, but it works as a whole. Pokémon the Movie: I Choose You! succeeds in celebrating the history of the franchise and showing potential fans why they should check it out.

POKÉMON THE MOVIE: I CHOOSE YOU! / CERT: PG / DIRECTOR: KUNIHIKO YUYAMA / SCREENPLAY: SHÔJI YONEMURA / STARRING: SARAH NATOCHENNY, IKUE OTANI, KATE BRISTOL, CARTER CATHCART, RODGER PARSONS, DAVID OLIVER NELSON, SUZY MYERS, BILLY BOB THOMPSON/ RELEASE DATE: FEBRUARY 12TH

THE LEGO NINJAGO MOVIE

The LEGO Ninjago Movie

The original LEGO Movie took the world by storm back in 2014, proving its naysayers completely wrong and becoming a worldwide cultural smash; The LEGO Batman Movie was also incredible in its own right, and now we have The LEGO Ninjago Movie, which is based on the popular children’s franchise, LEGO Ninjago: Masters of Spinjitzu, which ran from 2011 to… well, it’s still going to this day! This theatrical movie is influenced by the show, but is really its own thing with no narrative ties to its source material, even right down to having a completely different cast. The story is that the city of Ninjago is frequently attacked by the evil Lord Garmadon, and it’s common knowledge that high-schooler Lloyd is his son and he’s constantly bullied for it, but nobody knows that he and his gang are colour-coded, elemental ninjas that defend the city from Garmadon.

All this is set up within the first third of the movie, and is easily the weakest part since it is basically nothing but set-up that is crammed with so many familiar clichés and tropes, whether it’s the bullied outcast, the superheroes with secret identities theme or having giant robot fights within cities. Some of the narrative beats and jokes present in this film are clearly aimed for a younger audience demographic, especially with its teen dialogue, yet there are some of the familiar jokes as seen in previous LEGO movies with the characters being self-aware of their plastic-toy form and world. Also, while the other two LEGO movies are superior with their characters, story and humour, this film actually looks better and much more creative than the other movies, right down to its city design, as well as making every animated element feel distinctive so as to make it easier to distinguish and make out.

When it gets into the final two thirds, this is where the movie truly shines; the narrative is much better paced, the humour becomes wittier and sharper, and it almost becomes an entirely different movie altogether. The father-and-son dynamic between Lloyd and Garmadon is pretty much the main crux of the movie, and this storyline could’ve easily become schmaltzy and tired, but it actually worked remarkably well. Yes, it did wrap up perhaps too simply and neatly by the end, but it was still sweet and didn’t detract from what came before. In terms of the characters present in this film, Master Wu is the typical wise mentor with a mischievous and sardonic wit about him, and Jackie Chan is wonderfully cast in this role and is way better utilised here than he was in all three Kung Fu Panda movies combined (take note Dreamworks!). While Lord Garmadon is in the same vain of villains that are self-aware of their own proud-to-be-a-villain nature, he is very entertaining and Justin Theroux’s dry smooth tones are brilliantly put to good use here. Dave Franco does a credible job as Lloyd, and his character is pretty much the emotional centre of the movie as he tries to cope with his father issues, but his friends, however, are just there… they aren’t terrible in any way, but they are just there…

Overall, this isn’t as flawless or consistent as the previous two LEGO movies, and there is plenty here to pick apart, whether it’s the baggy first act, the side characters being underdeveloped, some clichés becoming tiresome, and the live-action bookends to the movie being somewhat unnecessary in the grand scheme of things. However, this is still a solid LEGO movie with a great voice cast (especially Jackie Chan and Justin Theroux), the second and third acts being superior, the animation is improved from before, and is, in the end, an enjoyable viewing experience for all ages. Sure, this may not connect with all audiences in the same way the previous two movies did, and if these familiar tropes and clichés were to carry on into other LEGO movies then they would start to be repetitive and become just another recycled franchise, but there are certainly no signs of that as of now, and if you give this movie a chance, you might find something of value here.

However, it’s completely baffling that certain critics prefer the subpar Cars 3 and Despicable Me 3 to this, and it is mighty annoying that the absolute worst animated movie of the year with The Emoji Movie still managed to make more money than both this and Captain Underpants, so thanks for that hate-watchers!

THE LEGO NINJAGO MOVIE / CERT: U / DIRECTOR: CHARLIE BEAN, PAUL FISHER, BOB LOGAN / SCREENPLAY: VARIOUS / STARRING: JACKIE CHAN, DAVE FRANCO, FRED ARMISEN, KUMAIL NANJANI, MICHAEL PENA, OLIVIA MUNN, JUSTIN THEROUX / RELEASE DATE: FEBURARY 12TH

CURSE OF THE WITCH’S DOLL

curse witchs doll

Curse of the Witch’s Doll is a film containing far more intelligence and innovation than you’d think from simply watching the trailer or looking at the poster. It’s being sold as a conventional evil doll movie but, through a series of twists and turns, it turns into more of an anthology consisting of three distinct segments, all tenuously connected by the titular witch’s doll.

Having each segment organically flow into the next is actually a pretty great concept, but sadly, the execution lets it down. The individual stories feel disjointed and the pace stalls every time the film shifts gear as it begins telling a new story.

Despite the fact that it looks less like an ancient relic of evil and more like something you’d find in a pound shop during the week leading up to Halloween, the doll itself is striking and mostly used to great effect. The qualifier ‘mostly’ is there because there are a few instances where the film lingers just long enough for us to notice how bad the motion-tween effects used to animate the thing’s face are, but for the most part, the doll offers some legitimately startling moments.

One thing that would have benefited the production greatly is a better performance from Claire Carreno, who portrays the witch. Her role mostly boils down to providing the doll’s vocals and, whilst her acting is completely in line with the wooden, emotionless delivery found from the cast throughout the film (suggesting a strange directorial decision rather than a low quality of actor), the doll could have really come to life if the actor behind it had an interesting voice and was willing to chew the scenery a bit more.

The film is largely an impressive effort from its micro-budget and first-time filmmakers, but all of their hard work is frustratingly ruined by a complete and utter lack of anything close to a satisfying resolution or conclusion to any of its three narratives. It’s almost like watching a parody of Lost, where every time the audience asks a question, the film responds with a shout of “Look, over there” before trying to distract them with a proverbial smoke monster until the clock runs out. The film’s final moments are so cack-handed that the nasty taste left in your mouth completely overwrites any positive memories you had of what preceded it.

And that’s why Curse of the Witch’s Doll is so incredibly frustrating. Despite also being known as Conjuring the Witch’s Doll, this isn’t, like so many of its peers, a simple cash-grab designed to make money out of people confusing it for another film. A great deal of effort and talent seems to have been spent on making the most of limited resources.

If you’re a big horror fan and you consider the journey more important than the destination, you should consider checking this one out. If, however, you find the ending to be arguably the most important part of a film, then beware: not only does this film not manage to stick the landing, but it doesn’t even try to land in the first place. It just flies until it runs out of fuel, crashes into the ocean and leaves us to search for the black box. Roll credits.

CURSE OF THE WITCH’S DOLL / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR & SCREENPLAY: LAWRENCE FOWLER / STARRING: HELEN CREVEL, PHILIP RIDOUT, LAYLA WATTS / RELEASE DATE: FEBRUARY 6TH (US)

BLADE RUNNER 2049

blade runner 2049 dvd

It should never have worked. Blade Runner is not only a favourite of countless fans, but a groundbreaking point in sci-fi history. A sequel would at best rehash its highlights, at worst sully its memory. And yet, as November 2017 neared, signs started to emerge that we might be getting something special, not least the success of Denis Villeneuve’s Arrival. When his Blade Runner 2049 finally came out, the response was a collective sigh of relief. With it now reaching home media, it’s time to ask: is it really that good? In brief: yes.

To bring everyone up to speed… Thirty years after Rick Deckard ‘retired’ Roy Batty and went on the run, K (Gosling), a replicant who works as an LAPD Blade Runner, finds the remains of a female replicant who died giving birth. An artificially created person being able to reproduce has wide-ranging consequences, so K is tasked with finding the child. This mission will put him in the crosshairs of the sinister Wallace Corporation, and eventually lead to Rick Deckard himself (Ford).

A shift up in scale, then, from the 1982 Blade Runner, accentuated by the story taking K out of neon-drenched Los Angeles and to the waste-covered ruin that San Diego has become, followed by the nuclear ghost town of Las Vegas. It’s a shift that Villeneuve and his team manage beautifully, with immensely impressive detail put into every frame and stunning cinematography from Roger Deakins. Everything feels true to the original and yet perfectly updated; “the same palette, but by a different painter” as Villeneuve says in one of the Blu-ray’s extras.

This broadening also applies to the story, which takes the core themes of Blade Runner and pokes at them from every direction. It’s a film about what it is to be human, and about the nature of memory. Yet it’s also a very personal film for K, who finds himself with as many questions about his own identity as fans have ever had about Deckard’s. The subplot following his relationship with holographic AI Joi (De Armas) would make a poignant film on its own.

And the really good news is, Blade Runner 2049 sustains repeat viewing. In fact, it gets better. With the initial nervousness out of the way, it’s well worth putting your feet up and taking 2049 in again, to properly appreciate the depths of the story and the craft behind every frame. Plus, knowing the big twist before it comes adds a whole new layer to K’s quest. With this, Denis Villeneuve pulled an Empire Strikes Back – a follow-up that not only lives up to, but substantially expands upon, the first.

Sony has gone all out with the home media releases, and there are a few different variants to get your hands on, including a gorgeous 4K limited edition complete with Blade Runner whiskey glasses. That said, the basic Blu-ray, which we reviewed, has impressive extras, too. Three short films, initially released online, bridge the gap between the two movies. These haven’t been made cheaply; not only do they provide useful backstory to 2049’s world but they look like proper Blade Runner instalments and even feature Jared Leto and Dave Bautista reprising their roles.

The twenty-minute doc Designing the World of Blade Runner, meanwhile, provides some fascinating behind-the-scenes insights, while six Blade Runner 101 featurettes explore facets of the film’s world. Overall, this is a seriously impressive package of a seriously brilliant film and the first must-buy of 2018.

BLADE RUNNER 2049 / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: DENIS VILLENEUVE / SCREENPLAY: HAMPTON FANCHER, MICHAEL GREEN / STARRING: RYAN GOSLING, HARRISON FORD, ROBIN WRIGHT, ANA DE ARMAS, JARED LETO / RELEASE DATE: FEBRUARY 5TH