OUT NOW: ISSUE 431!

ISSUE 431 – OUT NOW!

This month, we get excited about the imminent arrival of ROGUE ONE: A STAR WARS STORY, look forward to A MONSTER CALLS, LA LA LAND, and ASSASSIN’S CREED, plus the eagerly-awaited PASSENGERS.

We also dig up some zombie Nazis in DEAD SNOW 2: RED VS. DEAD and speculate on what the DOCTOR WHO Christmas Special will bring.

In our regular features, independent filmmaker KATE SHENTON tells us all about her award-winning film EGOMANIAC.

Plus all your favourite COLUMNS, NEWS, REVIEWS and much MORE from the worlds of SCI-FI, HORROR and FANTASY!


AVAILABLE IN PRINT(HERE) & DIGITAL (HERE)

SHARE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW OR ON TWITTER @STARBURST_MAG

Find your local STARBURST stockist HERE, or buy direct from us HERE. For our digital edition (available to read on your iOS, Android, Amazon, Windows 8, Samsung and/or Huawei device – all for just £1.99), visit MAGZTER DIGITAL NEWSSTAND.

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

STARBURST’s Top Ten Tips for the Next DOCTOR WHO

The Mirror earlier this week published a rather gossipy article, under the catchy headline Doctor Who due a major shake-up as bosses aim for ‘brand new show’ in 2018, suggesting that the powers that be at the BBC are so disturbed at the downward trend in merchandising sales they are unwilling to countenance incoming showrunner Chris Chibnall moving forward with the show, with Peter Capaldi and Pearl Mackie in place as the Doctor and his companion.

Instead, an “insider” insists a “source” has claimed, “BBC management wants a return to the format from the David Tennant era, when you had a dashing male lead and young female companion.”

In the spirit of lending a helpful hand, and not at all in a clickbaity sort of a way, STARBURST Magazine would like to help Chibnall and his bosses narrow down the search for a new leading man, by presenting our Top Ten Potential New Doctor Whos…

10. OLIVIA COLMAN

There’s nothing to say the hot and “dashing” younger actor the BBC cast in Doctor Who couldn’t be cast in the companion role, so why not switch genders and have Olivia Colman as the Doctor herself? She’s talented and funny and most importantly, she has previous experience with incoming showrunner Chris Chibnall, having played the female lead in his runaway success Broadchurch. That’s the kind of conspiracy of connectivity that money can’t buy, with the added bonus that Colman has previously appeared in the series too, allowing Chibnall to write a scene somewhere down the line in which it’s explained that the reason the Doctor chose this face was because his subconscious was telling him that getting somebody else to dub in all of Colman’s lines (thus avoiding having to use her East Anglian accent) was going to be a good thing.

 

9. PATERSON JOSEPH

Having already been cast as Doctor Who, albeit not being able to take up the role at the time and thus having to watch somebody else play the part you knew you were right for, didn’t stop Brian Blessed going on to have a highly successful and very noisy career back in 1966, but for Paterson Joseph the past five or so years haven’t yielded anything of the quality of I, Claudius or, um, Flash Gordon. So what better way to kick-start the Survivors remake actor’s career than by finally stepping into the TARDIS after all? It would certainly allow the Peep Show actor to get one up on his Peep Show co-star Olivia Colman, if the next Doctor was to be the first black Doctor rather than the first woman Doctor.

 

8. EDDIE REDMAYNE

 

34-year-old Eddie Redmayne comes with a pre-existing fervent female fanbase – the “Get Reddy Eddies” or something they call themselves – so how better to return Doctor Who to the kind of screaming fangirl successes of the late noughties than by casting an actor who doesn’t just get the girls going, but has also been known to get going as a girl himself? In fact, you could appeal to all sorts of demographics (and mess with the old school fan hive mind no end) by getting Eddie to play the Doctor in drag – or even as a woman, which would satisfy those craving a cross-gender regeneration while appeasing those who’d be most likely to put their boots through their television sets if a woman was ever cast in the role.

 

7. ISAAC HEMPSTEAD WRIGHT

If it’s young the BBC want, why not plump for the 17-year-old voice of Eggs in The Boxtrolls? Hempstead Wright’s genre credentials extend from horror flick The Awakening to the mighty Game of Thrones, and he’s even been in Family Guy. Plus, he looks great in brainy-specs (a pre-requisite for the younger Doctor) and his hair is easily floppy enough to feel at home in the TARDIS without having to go the way of Paul McGann and his expensive vinyl hairpiece.

 

6. TRICIA HELFER

If it’s hot the BBC want, they couldn’t possibly get much hotter than Battlestar Galactica’s Tricia Helfer, the extremely hot Cylon who Brit actor James Callis’ Gaius Baltar got the hots and nearly lost the plot for. Yup, if British Baltar can get the hots for hot Trish, there’s no reason the rest of the British public can’t follow suit. The possible downside is, of course, that being both a woman and American, 42-year-old Canadian Helfer would likely raise the ire of online fandom. But since when has the prospect of that not actively encouraged the Corporation to make a controversial casting decision?

 

5. DANIEL RADCLIFFE

Back in the 1970s, Tom Baker often attempted to persuade the producers of Doctor Who that he could play the Doctor with a talking cabbage for a companion. Casting Daniel Radcliffe, the principal star of perhaps the biggest fantasy film series of the last two decades, as the Doctor might achieve many things – including bringing the programme the kind of phenomenal success that the Harry Potter films enjoyed – and indeed Hammer Films even cast Radcliffe in The Woman in Black in an attempt to revive their own flagging franchise. But needing to cast a talking cabbage as the companion wouldn’t be one of them.

 

4. DAVID GRAHAM

Grandpa Pig actor David Graham might be in his 90s, but perhaps the BBC might reconsider a younger, hotter Doctor in favour of an older, wiser one, potentially with a younger, hotter couple acting as a pair of companions rather than just the one? After all, Graham’s television experience takes in both Parker and Brains in Thunderbirds, and he was recently the voice of the Wise Old Elf in Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom, surely a dry run for becoming the Doctor if ever there was one. And if any more persuasion were needed, Graham was also one of the original Dalek voices back in 1963, which would certainly please the fans if not the BBC itself.

 

3. BILLIE PIPER

She’s already returned to the series once, in her co-star David Tennant’s last series as the Doctor in 2008, and she returned to the series once again as something called “The Moment” in the anniversary year of 2013 – so it’s not like she’s shy of coming back and it’s not like she hasn’t already come back in a role other than the one that made her really famous. In fact, her first return opposite Catherine Tate was entirely based around the character of Rose ignoring the rules and breaking through from an alternative universe, so Piper’s casting as the Doctor pretty much writes itself.

 

2. JOHNNY DEPP

After a summer of sordid scandal-making, Johnny Depp’s currency among the film studios is likely to be in a sharp decline. However, his potency among female viewers of a certain tender age is probably still pretty high, so what better coup for the BBC than to persuade the Deppster into spending a couple of years in Wales making television on sixty-hour weeks instead of continuing with the movies? It’s an offer the 53-year-old star of Cry-Baby, Dead Man, and Corpse Bride and friend of notoriously anglophile and goth-devotee director Tim Burton would be unlikely to refuse.

 

1. DAVID TENNANT

Let’s face it, it’s what both the BBC and the fans really want, isn’t it?

SHARE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW OR ON TWITTER @STARBURST_MAG

Find your local STARBURST stockist HERE, or buy direct from us HERE. For our digital edition (available to read on your iOS, Android, Amazon, Windows 8, Samsung and/or Huawei device – all for just £1.99), visit MAGZTER DIGITAL NEWSSTAND.

CLICK TO BUY!

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

An Evil Heritage – Norman J Warren Talks SATAN’S SLAVE

The late seventies were a boom time for independent artists. Punk rock was breaking the rules of how music was made and cinemas were bursting with small-budgeted films and larger movies made by directors who had risen from film schools rather than a studio system. In the UK, Hammer and Amicus paved the way for a burgeoning horror scene that attracted talented young filmmakers to find their own finance for movies, much in the same way the Internet and digital have done for modern directors.

Norman J. Warren came onto the scene in the late ‘60s with a pair of ‘sexploitation’ dramas, Her Private Hell and Loving Feeling. Both were incredibly successful at the box office – as most sex orientated films were, but it was several years – 1975, to be precise – before he’d get the chance to make another movie. That film was Satan’s Slave.
It’s a curious story of a young girl, Catherine (Candace Glendenning, who had made an impression with her roles in Pete Walker’s The Flesh and Blood Show and Tower of Evil, which was produced by Richard Gordon), visiting a mysterious uncle (played by the wonderful Michael Gough) with her mother and father. Tragically, just as they get there, they crash and her parents perish in the fiery car. Uncle Alexander takes Catherine in and looks after her while she’s in shock. It’s here she meets his son, Stephen (Martin Potter, an amazing talent of the time who starred in several cult classics such as Goodbye Gemini among others) and Frances (Barbara Kellerman). As she convolutes in the opulent grounds of Alexander’s home, she becomes very close to Stephen. However, we’ve already seen a darker side to him and his family. In the opening scenes, a woman is sacrificed in an occult ceremony, and we’ve witnessed Stephen trap the head of one of his lady friends in a door when she takes exception to his attempted rape. We can sense quite clearly that young Stephen is more than a few slates short of a full roof. Laughing maniacally on a bed will always give that impression.

 

Catherine, in the meantime, is suffering hallucinations and feelings of dread, but she is certainly not prepared for the warning Frances has for her. She is to be sacrificed, apparently, in an attempt to resurrect an ancestor, Camilla York (played by Glendenning in the flashbacks) using Catherine’s body as a vessel. Camilla was said to be a potent witch and Alexander plans to utilise her revived powers for his own evil doing.

Trying to help her escape, Frances falls foul of Stephen and is left hanging around on the back of a door (via a knife through her throat) and Catherine is locked away to await the terrible ritual. We won’t spoil the ending, but rest assured there’s still some great surprises.

Satan’s Slave was written by David McGillivray, who is best known for his work with Pete Walker (House of Whipcord, Frightmare, and House of Mortal Sin and still very much active in the business) and epitomises the grittier side of British horror cinema of the seventies: copious amounts of Kensington Gore, plenty of naked ladies, and an atmospheric and striking score (by the legendary John Scott).

To fully get a feel for the movie, we spoke to director Norman J. Warren; and began with asking how he managed to arrange financing for the film. “Initially, we did shop around, we went to a few distributors we were half interested, but not that committed. We then started going to private individuals and after a while, we did find one or two that were interested, but we got to the stage where we would have fifty percent of the money, but we’d have to go and find the other fifty percent. By the time we found our half, the people putting up the first fifty percent had changed their mind! That went on for over a year. The other thing that was a nuisance was dealing with people who had nothing to do with the business, they always wanted to make changes to the script – and some of those changes were quite ridiculous. In the end, it got so frustrating, and we were getting absolutely nowhere, Les Young, who was the cameraman and producer basically just said ‘Why don’t we just try and do it anyway?’ We ended up with £15,000 in cash and had a lot of favours coming in from companies and people all agreeing to work for small fees.
This cost-cutting even extended to the director himself, “I was already an editor – I’d been doing that for some years – I agreed to do that to save money. I’m not credited as such on the film because in those days, film shoots were very much controlled by the unions and you were not allowed to do two jobs! So there’s no editing credit at all! Strangely enough, the union never actually asked why there was none!

 

As mentioned, Satan’s Slave came quite a few years after Norman’s initial success, and was his first horror thriller. He explained the delay, “It really happened out of frustration of other things not happening. I was meant to be doing a film for Amicus called The Book of Seven Seals but after endless meetings with Milton Subotsky, they decided not to go ahead with it. That was a disappointment, but the big one for me was a film called The Naked Eye, which was for American International Pictures (A.I.P.) and it would have starred Vincent Price. That went on for about eighteen months and over that time they kept putting the budget up a bit, and in the end turned around and said this film’s too expensive! It was such an enormous disappointment at the time for everybody. It would have been so exciting working with Vincent, as he was such an enormous star at that time. You never know in life what’s going to happen; had I done that film, my whole career could have taken another route.

This is a situation that rings true even today, as Norman continues, “I feel sorry for young directors now, they are given some opportunities now that look great on paper, but it if goes wrong, you’ll never get asked again. You get a lot of first time directors who make one film and you never hear of them again! It’s all to do with box office. I was so lucky, really because when I did Her Private Hell, the subject was still rather difficult, even though the film was so naïve; but they publicised it on the sex, and it made a fortune. As a result, it was a wonderful start for me – you can’t do better than make money. I’m happy to say, all my films – with the exception of Bloody New Year (1987) – have made money.

The film opens with the most evocative credits sequence, with an animated skull, something that sets the tone and also makes the film stand out from similar movies of the time, “They were all the idea of Hayden Pearce, who was the art director,” Norman tells us, “one of the most talented people I’ve ever known. I’ve worked with Hayden on everything including documentaries and commercials. He animated and shot it himself over a weekend, including doing the artwork as well.” These is set perfectly to the haunting music of John Scott, “That’s another thing in itself – John Scott’s such a talented musician. The score is actually such a very simple piece of music, but the way he does it, it goes into your mind and you can actually remember it! It’s a simple theme, but it works.

An element of the film that provides some rich atmosphere and an impression of a much larger budget is the location. A grand house in the middle of woodland is an ideal hideaway for someone looking to conduct occult rituals. Norman told us, “That was once again Hayden – he was searching out properties, and to be honest, we were getting pretty desperate, we couldn’t find anywhere. Most places were not suitable or the people were not interested. And because we didn’t have any money, we needed a house that also had furniture in it. Hayden was ringing everyone he knew in connection to art departments and someone suggested the mock Tudor house in Pirbright, and we couldn’t believe our luck. Not only did it look great outside but everything in there was genuine – there were wall-to-wall paintings and it was fully dressed. The people were quite happy for us to use it. There were five acres of land including those woods, and another bonus was we found there was a sub-station there. We got in touch with the electricity company and we were able to get as much power as we needed from that.” It was a find that both Norman and other filmmakers were keen to utilise again, “It subsequently got used by other people; it was in Virgin Witch, and, of course, we used it again for Terror. It was too good a location to lose. It belonged to a Baron and Baroness, and they didn’t mind what we did. We didn’t damage the place at all, we were very careful and when we finished, we sent in a team of cleaners and it looked better than when we’d arrived! They were an elderly couple, so there were cobwebs everywhere. You’d never actually find it if you tried, it was so tucked away – which was also a bonus for us.

There was one issue with the setting as they found out when filming began, as Norman tells us, “There was no problem with sound except Pirbright is right next to the military establishment. We only found out when we started filming that every Tuesday and Thursday, they used to play wars, and they would blow things up outside and fire off cannons. We were filming on our second day outside and it sounded like a war had started; we had to stop and go back inside because we couldn’t hear a thing.

This in itself had an added bonus, “We came to film the car crash – when it bursts into flames – we actually did that on the military land.” Norman continues, “The problem with blowing a car up like that is you have to do it safe, of course, but you have to get rid of it afterwards. That would be extra expense, but we talked to the military and they let us do it there; they didn’t mind us leaving it as they could shoot it up afterwards.

 

The cast of Satan’s Slave are exemplary, and Norman has nothing but good memories of working with them. Michael Gough, in particular, “He was an absolute joy, a really lovely man. He just joined in with everything and was always word perfect, so professional. He never complained, and we worked some unbelievable hours.” There was also no ‘superstar’ ego with the legendary actor, “We had him for three weeks, and he lived in Norfolk at the time, and we couldn’t afford a hotel or anything and he said ‘Don’t worry, I’ve got a friend and I can stay with them’. So he slept on their couch, and we’d pick him up at 5.30am and he was squashed in the back of an old Ford Escort – we had no limos! We usually worked until about midnight, and we’d stop off on the way back and buy fish and chips to eat in the car and that was dinner! He actually seemed to enjoy it.

This lack of budget extended to the basic things on the film, too. Including what the characters wore, as Norman explains, “Apart from the opening scene in which he’s wearing the satanic robes, everything else he was wearing were his own clothes. I said to him at the beginning, ‘We haven’t got any money for wardrobe’, and he suggested wearing his own. The next day, he came to my front door with two suitcases with his entire wardrobe, and promptly put things on and said ‘tell me what you like’.

The other male lead, Martin Potter, was another blessing for the film. “We really got lucky there, as Michael Gothard (The Devils) was going to do our film, but right at the last minute, he backed out. We were in a desperate position so rang round some agents and they suggested Martin Potter, who’d just finished shooting The Legend of Robin Hood for TV. He just became the character. It’s a part that if you got it wrong, it would be very silly, and it’s like a controlled madness. You just never know when he’s going to change.

Potter not only played a visually striking character, his intense looks also made him a compelling screen presence and did draw attention when the crew went out, “His eyes are really something else. We used to go and have lunch at the local pub; Martin was actually on TV with the Robin Hood show at that time. So his face was well known to people, and a lot would come into the bar while we were there and they’d make jokes about it, most days Martin would take it well and smile but sometimes if he wasn’t in the mood, he’d give a look with his eyes and people would just run off!

Although the film was made with a low budget, the make-up effects were amazing. They were the work of Robin Grantham and Nick Maley, and there was one particular effect that Norman remembers well, “The thing that was a work of art on Satan’s Slave was when Martin Potter gets the nail file in the eye, that stands up pretty well in a still, which is always a good sign with make-up. There’s actually a false eye in front of Martin’s eye that has a support to hold the nail file in place. Then you have all the eyelids and eyelashes and face built up on top. There’s also a blood supply to the eye, which goes under the hair, round the ear and down the face; the fact we managed to get all that on Martin’s face without it sticking out – it would have been completely out of balance. It is a bit bigger, but it stands up in a close-up. It’s a remarkable achievement.

 

Following post-production, which as Norman explained was a nightmare since he was attempting to edit the footage on rented equipment in his house at all hours, the film was picked up for distribution by Brent Walker. It got the film out to an audience, but wasn’t the best situation, as Norman tells us, “We did ok, but they did kind of rip us off. We did get enough back to pay everyone off, and eventually, we got some money back, and enough for them to say ‘you can do another one’. They did very well out of it, they put it out three times.

UK audiences can enjoy Satan’s Slave again, or discover it for the first time as the rights reverted back to Norman after the Brent Walker deal ended. It will also make an appearance on UKTV, so it will no doubt gain a whole new legion of fans. It’s something Norman is more than thrilled about, “Out of all of my films, it seems to be one that people like – they are always wanting to talk about it, and I have fond memories of it.

SATAN’S SLAVE is next screened on Horror Channel on December 16th. Sky 319, Virgin 149, Freeview 70, Freesat 138.

The Most Badass Female Movie Villains of All Time

The stereotypical badass is often all consuming, strong and masculine. But there’s nothing scarier than finding a villain than the unexpected, the crafty and the unpredictable. Throughout history, women have played some of the most badass villains of all, with many made even more interesting by their unexpected back-stories. See for yourself as we count down the most badass female movie villains of all time.

The Wicked Witch of the West – The Wizard of Oz

First up is one of the oldest female villains of all the time, the Wicked Witch of the West. We all know the gruesome green face and cackling laugh of Idina Menzel’s recent portrayal, but if you subscribe to the extended history presented in West End musical Wicked, you’ll discover a lot more to this story.

Few villains are pure evil. What really makes them scary is that their story is plausible – and sometimes even understandable. In the case of Elphaba, it’s a story of lost love and betrayal that led to her chasing Dorothy down the Yellow Brick Road with a band of flying monkeys. Okay, so maybe it’s not quite that understandable…

Mystique – X-Men

Another prime example of how badass an identifiable villain can be is Mystique, the shape-shifting, gymnastic mutant from X-Men. Her past of prejudice and bullying fed into her eventual siding with Magneto’s mutant uprising against the humans, an army which is hardly full of obvious bad guys.

Her story is a sad one, with constant confusion and allegiance changes that mean you cannot help but take pity on her. That is until she unleashes a scaly blue can of whoop-ass on anybody who gets in her way, and we realise that she is just as dangerous as any of her male counterparts.

O-Ren Ishii – Kill Bill: Volume 1

Kill Bill is a woman’s story through and through. The hero is female, the main villains are female, and the entire plot is set towards destroying one man who commanded them all – Bill. Still, there is one character in particular who stands out as one of the most badass villains in movie history – O-Ren Ishii.

O-Ren’s back-story comes in the form of an archetypal revenge flick, bleeding through to the present in everything she does. From Lucy Liu’s unsettling silence to the moment she slices an accomplices head clean off at a board meeting, she is pure, 100% badass – and it all stems from a group of men destroying her life when she was young.

Talia al Ghul – The Dark Knight Rises

Talia al Ghul is the perfect example of a female villain hidden in plain sight – you literally don’t see her coming. In The Dark Knight Rises, it is revealed that she is not in fact Wayne Enterprises’ board member Miranda Tate, but R’as al Ghul’s daughter, bent on completing her father’s work.

What’s fascinating is that she remains hidden behind the stereotypical masculine bombardment of Bane on Gotham, pulling all the strings. When Batman finds out that Tom Hardy’s masked mercenary is in fact the faithful servant of his business associate Miranda Tate, the entire universe breaks down to reveal one of the most badass villains in film history.

Bellatrix Lestrange – Harry Potter

While a believable and identifiable villain can be a terrifying thing, a totally manic sadist can be just as frightening. Chaos is scary, and there is no movie villain more chaotic and sadistic than Voldermort’s number one follower Bellatrix Lestrange.

It’s obvious from the bird’s-nest hair, gothic robes and laissez faire use of the Cruciatus Curse that Bellatrix is the last person you want to meet in a dual at Hogwarts. She moves like she’s possessed, laughs at pain and, in true Dickensian style, her name reflects her personality perfectly. She’s just plain strange.

Regina George – Mean Girls

So Regina George may not be trying to destroy entire cities or seek vengeance for a dark past, but she’s still one of the most badass female super villains of all time. Why? Because in the animal kingdom that is high school she is queen bee, with the power to make or break your reputation.

Regina George is the one who commands the entire school, making her fellow students fall to her feet one after the next. When home-schooled Cady Heron enters however, the world is changed dramatically and Regina’s reign of terror is ultimately destroyed.

The Sociable Online World and How it has Changed Gaming

There was a time with gaming where if you wanted to be sociable you had to call your friends around to sit on the sofa to do battle in your favourite games. The times have changed now though and it seems that all games are expected to feature online multiplayer support so we can play against people from all over the world.

Whether it be on a console like the Xbox One and PlayStation 4, the PC, or smartphones and tablets we want to play games together. Gaming has never been so sociable, and it looks like this is set to stay. There are signs that local multiplayer games are making a comeback, but as part of the functionality in place. Online gaming has nothing to worry about with the rise of sofa multiplayer games.

Another interesting addition to the world of social gaming is the rise in sharing what we have been doing on games. On current consoles like PlayStation 4 it is easy to save a snapshot of a beautiful scene we’ve noticed, or share a video clip of something awesome we’ve managed to do and that is impressive. There is also the ability to stream games so people can watch us play and even interact with us. To see the popularity of this, just look at services like Twitch.

Twitch opens up our eyes to the popularity of gaming and also the potential that has been created by online social gaming. Whether it is the solo gamer playing from their homes and showing off their skills, or it is the ESports tournament being streamed live, there are many different variations of games being streamed out to the world. This is a new phenomenon that is really taking off with players and it looks like there is no end to the popularity that it has taken.

What is being noticed about social gaming is the potential for money making opportunities. Whether this is through understanding the complex game of poker, the partnership system in Twitch, or even the advertisements shown on the streams, there is money to be made for the gamer. The fact that money is also made by the creator of the games also pushes the industry. When the game makers see the latest trends they tend to go with them, as we see with the popularity of online gaming.

With gaming now moving into the world of Virtual Reality, one important aspect has been the inclusion of social gaming in the platform. Not only is there the ability to stream in the virtual world, but also the ability to play with friends. The future of this can be seen in such games as the Ubisoft Star Trek virtual game which pits a team against the dangers of space.

The online world may be a vast landscape of potential, but in terms of the gamers, it seems to make the world a smaller place. It brings people from all points on the planet into an arena where they can play together, with whatever game they choose to play and that is impressive.

OUT NOW: ISSUE 430!

ISSUE 430 – OUT NOW!

This month, we turn back the clock and take an affectionate look at the UNIVERSAL MONSTERS
As well as Dracula, Frankenstein’s monster, and the Wolf Man, we preview the new film from the HARRY POTTER world: FANTASTIC BEASTS AND WHERE TO FIND THEM.

If that’s not enough, we talk to horror icon MICHAEL BERRYMAN about making THE HILLS HAVE EYES and writer JAMES MORAN reminisces about COCKNEYS VS ZOMBIES.

In our regular features, independent filmmaker CHRISTIAN NICOLSON tells us all about his award-winning sci-fi spoof THIS GIANT PAPIER-MÂCHÉ BOULDER IS ACTUALLY REALLY HEAVY.

Plus all your favourite COLUMNS, NEWS, REVIEWS and much MORE from the worlds of SCI-FI, HORROR and FANTASY!

  
AVAILABLE IN PRINT(HERE) & DIGITAL (HERE)

SHARE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW OR ON TWITTER @STARBURST_MAG

Find your local STARBURST stockist HERE, or buy direct from us HERE. For our digital edition (available to read on your iOS, Android, Amazon, Windows 8, Samsung and/or Huawei device – all for just £1.99), visit MAGZTER DIGITAL NEWSSTAND.

MORE FROM AROUND THE WEB:

BEN AND HOLLY’S LITTLE KINGDOM: An Introduction

Children of a certain generation will have grown up with fond memories of the programmes that affected them most during their formative years; the peaceful pssht-coof pssht-coof of Ivor the Engine as he trundled gently along the track, Brian Cant’s tremulous singing to the rustic guitar melodies of Trumptonshire, the ingenuous psychedelia of the Magic Roundabout. Modern children’s TV, with its busy 3D computer animation, its all-too-obvious social lecturing or its adult-friendly knowing sub-texts just isn’t the same experience.

But then there’s Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom.

Animated by Astley Baker Davies, the studio that created the phenomenon that is Peppa Pig, Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom has old school innocence and charm aplenty – but it’s also possibly the best-kept secret in modern British television.

Everybody knows about Peppa Pig, of course – and the great news for parents is that there is currently a fifth series of 52 episodes in production. It’s the delightful programme about a family of animated pigs who live in a house on a hill, the episodes generally being five-minute vignettes about particular incidents that children – and grown-ups – will recognise from day-to-day life, as related through the perspective of little Peppa and her even smaller brother George. There’s an especially lovely instalment about a friendly spider in a doll’s house, for instance, and what the series really succeeds in doing is in informing the audience about commonplace situations without either pandering to the adults or patronising the children; Peppa Pig will often take its characters to the playground, the classroom, the doctors surgery or on holiday and by doing so children watching will learn about these things and the customs and etiquette surrounding them, without any ostentatious teaching going on. It’s an obvious approach but one that Astley Baker Davies have down to a fine art. The level of humour is never knowing in a cynical way; the “jokes for the grown-ups” are presented as if they’re actually intended as a comment on adult behaviour from the child’s point of view, and what the creators of the series have managed best of all is the assembly of a collection of characters who are empathetic, endearing and credible; a universal objective of children’s TV producers and one that Astley Baker Davies have adopted as their own peculiar alchemy.

 

All of which is also true of Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom, but to a perhaps much greater extent.

Astley Baker Davies’ follow-up series, currently standing at 104 episodes and which began broadcasting back in 2009, takes the magic of Peppa Pig and adds some sorcery of its own, aiming at a slightly older audience with episodes of just over double the previous series’ length. “Peppa Pig is set in a world that is basically the everyday world that we live in,” says co-creator Mark Baker. “The stories come from everyday events. We thought it would be interesting to make a series which was set in a magical world but where the stories still start off from everyday events – if that makes sense!”

The “magical world” of Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom is the meadow in which the regular characters live. “Somewhere, hidden amongst thorny brambles, is a little kingdom of elves and fairies. Everyone who lives here is very, very small,” as the opening narration has it. It’s the story of Ben, a little elf boy, and Holly, a fairy princess, each about as tall as a blade of grass. 

“In some ways it’s not that different because much of the process is the same,” adds producer Phil Davies. “I suppose in the detail of each script we can use more complex language, and the storytelling can be more complex, for instance having several threads to a storyline. In reality, everything we do is a huge challenge, whether it’s for audiences who are two or 92.”

 

The series posits an entire infrastructure among the tiny peoples of the meadow, with the elves living in a multi-storey tree at one end and the fairies inhabiting a castle at the other. The elves are the working class in Ben and Holly’s world, a society of manufacturers and menders, while the fairies are a benign ruling class whose accomplishments are arrived at through the use of magic. There are episodes set in the elves’ toy factory and the fairies’ magic school.

“Another starting point was that we wanted to make a series that was equally for boys and girls,” says co-creator Neville Astley. “We knew this would be a challenge but that’s what made it interesting. This is why the series is Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom rather than say ‘Holly’s Little Kingdom’. We try to make an equal number of Elf adventures (I suppose more appealing to boys) and Fairy adventures (which are a natural for girls).”

While the narrative in each instalment might begin with something relatively mundane (such as the King’s desire for a fish and chip supper), often this is just the springboard for a journey into the peculiar (the attempted acquisition of said fish leading to a Moby Dick-esque struggle between Ben’s father and a giant – and for giant, read “normal-sized” – fish, in the celebrated Season One episode Big Bad Barry). The relationship between the two peoples – and we are also introduced to dragons and mermaids, dwarves and aliens and even normal-sized people along the way – is what gives Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom its cornerstone; although the two children (and their friends) are of necessity the identification characters for the watching children’s audience, it’s the fully-realised world they inhabit, their elders and their preoccupations and the often self-made crises that ensue, that makes the series so universally appealing.

Among the more likeable characters are the two dads. Holly’s father is King Thistle (voiced by Ian Puleston-Davies, Coronation Street’s Owen Armstrong), an affable duffer who loves a quiet life but rarely if ever gets one, while Ben’s dad is Mr Elf (John Sparkes, the 2005 Fireman Sam and better known as Barry Welsh), voice of the common sense that nobody ever listens to – hence often the calamities that underpin the stories. Beyond the immediate families of our eponymous heroes (including Holly’s younger sisters, the attention deficient twins Daisy and Poppy) are a wealth of supporting characters, leading the closing titles to occasionally run to several pages’ worth of names.

 

The three true stars of Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom, however, are Ben’s pet ladybird Gaston, the Wise Old Elf and Holly’s housekeeper Nanny Plum. Nanny Plum is possibly the most sardonic character in children’s television – so much so the parents without a facility for irony can frequently be found complaining about her voice on mums’ forums – but the sarcasm (catchphrase: “Whatever!” Oh, and occasionally “Jelly flood!”) comes with an artlessness that’s common to all of the inhabitants of the Little Kingdom. Including the Wise Old Elf (whose real name is revealed late enough into the run that I’m not going to spoiler it here), the elderly know-it-all beneficent patriarch of the elf society, a character who oversees everything but understands comically little. It’s a running joke that Nanny Plum’s magic is somewhat incompetent and the Wise Old Elf’s schemes can cause more trouble than they solve, and the constant back-story of Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom is the friendly feud between the two; the elves are distrustful of magic and none more so than the Wise Old Elf, while the fairies tend to amusement in the elves’ reliance on practical solutions. Of course, frequently it’s practical solutions that solve the fairies’ problems and magic that resolves the elves’, but the Wise Old Elf and Nanny Plum never let that get in the way of a good snipe. Nanny Plum is voiced by the sublime Sarah Ann Kennedy (one alumnus among many of Peppa Pig), and the Wise Old Elf is David Graham, Parker from both the Real and new Thunderbirds and the original voice of the Daleks. Both actors effortlessly match one another – and the entire rest of the cast, chosen very carefully for their sympathy to the series’ conceits – for a combination of guilelessness and worldly-wisdom.

Gaston the ladybird is the only character other than Ben and Holly themselves to have been name checked in the title of one of the ten DVD collections that are available, and he is possibly the most collectively popular character of them all. Effectively playing the part of a pet dog, complete with panting and growling voices courtesy of Taig McNab, Gaston is as imbued with character as any of the other occupants of the Little Kingdom; he has his own little dwelling to the north of the meadow and any number of episodes place him front and centre (he is named in the titles of eight of them). Whether he be spoiling Mr Elf’s holiday plans by making repeated visits to the vet, or undergoing training at Miss Jolly’s pet school after eating King Thistle’s slippers, Gaston is in spite of the very simple animation the character you cannot take your eyes off. And it’s in the eyes where the genius of the Astley Baker Davies animation is to be found; by doing nothing more complicated than moving a single black dot around a larger white circle, the programme’s creators manage to tell you everything you need to know about the characters’ reactions and feelings. Even the fairies’ wands are given eyes and it can often be hilarious just watching them responding to what’s going on in the rest of the scenes.

Of course, Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom isn’t without its nods to the Real World. The Elf Mayor (father of Holly’s friend Strawberry; the fairies are all named for plants) is a dead ringer for Boris Johnson, the episode Gaston’s Visit (over two million hits on YouTube) features a sequence involving a familiarly unindustrious team of builders headed up by the Wise Old Elf (“We each have our jobs to do!”) when he’s not in command of Elf Rescue or supervising the Toy Factory, and there’s a running theme concerning the normal-sized Lucy and her family (Lucy’s father is voiced by Alexander Armstrong, who also plays the Boris Johnson-alike Mayor), involving a number of visits by Ben and Holly to the land of the Big People.

The music is another area in which, like Peppa Pig, Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom excels. The main theme and incidentals are an ideal blend of the cartoonishly unfussy and the timelessly wistful. “For the music,” says Mark Baker, “we work with a talented composer called Julian Nott. People may know his music from Wallace and Gromit and he also does all the music for Peppa Pig. Julian visits the studio regularly and views the episodes with the directors and editor. Then he goes away and composes the music for each episode. Sometimes we can re-use bits of music but often Julian has to write special new pieces for us.” Outside of children’s television, Knott has also provided the scores for Lark Rise to Candleford and the early Russell T Davies series The Grand, and in 2009 he won an Ivor Novello Award for A Matter of Loaf and Death.

 

And here’s the thing. Although obviously it helps, you don’t need to have small children to enjoy Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom. The internet is awash with tales of parents who leave Nick Jr. running after the little ones have gone to bed, just so they can catch an extra couple of episodes. Because as with all kids’ programmes, the people who make Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom are grown-ups themselves, but in contrast to the likes of Spongebob Squarepants and Adventure Time Neville Astley and Mark Baker don’t pitch their programmes at multiple levels. Instead, the series – just like Peppa Pig before it – is created with an all-inclusivity that uniquely leads to viewers of all ages laughing at the same moments, caring about the same characters and undergoing the same tensions. Ben and Holly, and King Thistle and (in spite of themselves) the Wise Old Elf and Nanny Plum and all of the other characters, share a genial worldview that matches a child’s innocent wonderment to an adult’s magical fantasy, and the series is filled with oddness and charm in equal measure. It’s a programme about engaging with life and not letting little problems, no matter how huge, temper your enthusiasm for discovering more of it. It combines the sense of nostalgia for a bygone simplicity that infuses the best works of Oliver Postgate and Gordon Murray, with the world-building and rule-shaping of a Lord of the Rings or a Harry Potter.

If it isn’t the cult hit among adults that Spongebob Squarepants is or quite as ubiquitous with families as its predecessor Peppa Pig, then that’s a shame. But don’t take my word for it, try it for yourself. Most if not all of the episodes can be found on popular video sharing websites, and the entire 104 episode run has been released on easily affordable DVD. So dial up Visiting the Marigolds, Dolly Plum or Acorn Day and give Ben and Holly’s Little Kingdom a whirl. If you’re not entranced by the middle of your second episode, then you probably don’t deserve to be.

What Gaming Does to Your Brain

Forget how your mum used to say that too much gaming would turn you into a square-eyed zombie. Science has proved her wrong. Yes, the good news is that playing computer games has many positive effects on the brain and can help you develop essential skills in life. Games are now being created to help improve memory, hand-eye coordination, and cognitive development. So which games should you be getting involved with to boost your brain’s potential?

For an all-round brain function-enhancing game, online poker is a good place to start. Over 40 million people play poker regularly, and the ones that are flourishing are those who have begun to understand the positive benefits the popular card game is having on their brains. The World Series of Poker has recently witnessed a rise in younger champions, who seem to have understood the value in keeping fit and healthy to maximise their brain power for the high-stakes tournaments.

A skilled poker player must utilise their memory to think about which cards have been predominant in recent hands, but also to remember how certain players bet when they were dealt particular cards. Did player A go high pre-flop when he had the pocket aces? Or did he bet gradually to draw the other players in and subtly win their money? These are the kind of questions poker players need to ask themselves when thinking about whether to bet against someone. They must also tap into maths skills to be able to calculate percentages, and in doing so work out their odds of receiving the card they need on the river to complete a hand.

Along with training general memory sharpness, research has shown that gaming actually has an effect on chemicals within the brain. A study by Dr Hans C. Breiter of Massachusetts General Hospital found that during gambling, blood flow to the brain increased in a similar way to when people take euphoric drugs. They also found that the more money involved, the more excited a person became. High stakes games like roulette and blackjack are prime examples of how to achieve this rush.

 
Brain Training on DS Lite” (CC BY-SA 2.0) by Lord Biro

For those that don’t like gambling though, there are plenty of other games that can be played to keep your mind sharp. Over recent years, brain training apps for mobile have become hugely prevalent. Peak is a collection of mini-games designed to improve memory, language, mental agility and attention, and Cognito is geared towards improving players’ logic skills.

Massive Mulitplayer Online Role Playing games like World of Warcraft can help to advance people’s social skills, as the aim of the game is to meet like-minded people and embark on quests together, and online shooter games like Call of Duty can help players develop their cooperative skills.

So not only do games help release pleasure inducing endorphins that stimulate the brain and cause excitement, they also perform a secondary function in sharpening up cognitive skills. So gamers, don’t feel bad about playing your favourite game for hours on end. It’s having a positive effect on your brain.

Header image: “Gaming” (CC BY-SA 2.0) by matsuyuki

Cult of the Witch House – An Appreciation of CURSE OF THE CRIMSON ALTAR

In the waning years of the Swinging Sixties, horror was finding different avenues to explore; films were becoming more explicit with the depiction of sex, violence, and – quite often – occult practices. Tigon British Film Productions, a company formed by infamous exploitation producer Tony Tenser as a rival to Hammer Films and Amicus, had begun making small inroads with a brace of films, including two classics directed Michael Reeves, The Sorcerers (1967) and Witchfinder General (1968). Reeves sadly passed away, aged 25, shortly after the release of the latter, but already Tigon had gained a reputation for making different, bold, films, and attracting some top name talent that gave the low budget productions appear much more heavyweight. This tradition continued with the 1968 production, The Curse of the Crimson Altar.

Acting legend Boris Karloff, whose career started in silent films, before becoming a worldwide superstar (aged 44, and certainly not an overnight success) with Universal Pictures’ Frankenstein (1931), had already appeared in The Sorcerers and returned to Tigon once again despite ill health and respiratory problems. Joining him was Christopher Lee, also a familiar face in horror films due to his work with Hammer and Amicus. Although not quite as well known, another two genre icons would also make appearances in the movie, Michael Gough and Barbara Steele.

Gough had built a solid reputation with work on TV and movies, but really found an audience with low budget horror and thrillers such as Horrors of the Black Museum (1959), Konga (1961), Black Zoo (1963), and They Came from Beyond Space (1967). Although he only plays a minor role in this film, his presence is certainly felt, and, as always, he leaves an indelible mark on the proceedings. Steele, on the other hand, was perhaps lesser known at the time, although the Cheshire-born actor had made an impact in Italian films such as Mario Bava’s The Mask of Satan (La maschera del demonio, 1960) – a film so shocking that the UK censors refused to grant a certificate until 1968, under the title Black Sunday, not long before the release of Crimson Altar – and Riccardo Freda’s The Terror of Dr Hichcock (L’orribile segreto del Dr. Hichcock, 1962). Here, she plays Lavinia Morley, a persecuted witch, who haunts the dreams of our hero.

Robert Manning (Mark Eden, who would become a familiar face on British TV several decades later when he played evil Alan Bradley in Coronation Street) is an antique dealer who is concerned for his brother Peter, who seems to have disappeared not long after sending him some interesting items. He heads to his last known whereabouts, Craxton Lodge, but the owner, J. D. Morley (Lee), informs him that Peter has never been there. However, being a decent sort, he invites Robert to stay; even though the locals are preparing for their annual memorial of the burning of the witch Morley – an ancestor of the lord of the house. Now, since Robert has already ingratiated himself with Morley’s daughter, Eve (Virginia Wetherell), who is the midst of a swinging party with her friends – complete with body painting, fighting girls, passed out blokes, and toffs spraying champers over each other in the most homoerotic manner possible, only to have a bored-looking lady pour the remains over her boobs – he snaps up the offer to stay. This party isn’t anything sinister or kinky, though. It’s more akin to an art school freak out than a satanic rite.

 

Eve shows Robert to his bedroom and he’s clearly impressed with the surroundings, “It’s a bit like one of those old houses in horror films”, he quips. “I expect Boris Karloff is going to pop up at any moment.” A cheeky in-joke of the type rarely done at the time.

Now, as we’ve already been privy to the fact that Peter (Denys Peak) has been involved somehow with a bizarre and erotic Black Mass ceremony involving half-naked men, a woman with nipple pasties, a whip, and a strange-coloured Barbara Steele, then it’s clear there’s more to the memorial than meets the eye. Robert is unnerved during the night by a dream of the ritual, too. But it was so vivid, almost real; it couldn’t have actually happened, could it? Well, yes, of course, it did. He also uncovers that his brother did, in fact, stay there, but under the alias that he used so as not to arouse suspicion among the wealthy whose antiques he wished to buy at knock-down prices.

The academic who lives next door comes to pay a visit, and Robert is invited to meet him. Professor March (Karloff) is an amiable chap, even bringing along some of his rarest vintage brandy; something that’s lost on Robert. He is an expert on the occult and clearly knows more about what’s going on than he lets on. He does invite Robert to view his extensive collection of instruments of torture. Not an offer you get every day, we’re sure.

As the celebrations for the memorial gets underway, Robert and Eve start to get closer – he’s a fast worker is our Bob, making a play for the poor girl almost straight away – and they head out to watch the ceremonial bonfire and some rather reckless use of fireworks (Karloff almost gets one in the face, which surely wasn’t in the script).

When Robert has another ‘dream’ of a ritual, in which he’s being made to sign a witch’s confession, he sees his brother, who has been made a slave of the Priestess Lavinia. He even ends up sleepwalking and is just saved from walking into a lake by a friendly neighbourhood policeman. He takes Robert back to the house and he goes knocking on Eve’s bedroom door, clearly a little distressed. Now, since Robert has already shown his ‘interest’, shall we say (essentially throwing himself at Eve), it might be a little naïve for her to answer her bedroom door to a potential sex pest in a short nightie. And even more so to let him lie in her single bed with him. Still, this was a different age, clearly. And lo and behold, the four-poster bed is soon a-rocking. When he finally makes it back to his own room, he comes across a secret door – one that leads to the room in his ‘dreams’.

Robert goes to see the Professor and learns that he is, in fact, the last descendant of the witch’s chief accuser – and she won’t rest until she is avenged.

 

We won’t spoil the rest of the plot, but there are twists and turns aplenty and it is certainly a bigger success as a movie than director Vernon Sewell’s previous Tigon picture, The Blood Beast Terror (1968), which is quite a struggle to re-watch these days (and star Peter Cushing wasn’t particularly enamoured with at the time).

Curse of the Crimson Altar is loosely based on the H. P. Lovecraft story The Dreams in the Witch House, and was retitled The Crimson Cult for its 1970 release in the US. The story is almost a predecessor to The Wicker Man with its basis of a missing person and rituals but has much more going for it than a lot of people give it credit for. Not least the stellar cast and vivid colour palette.

Although all the elements of the film work perfectly, it could have been much different. Karloff was originally cast as the villain, playing to type, but his ill health gave producers fears that he may not be able to finish filming. Before production began, the aging actor was dropped from the role and the search was on for an equally recognisable name. Attempts to sign Vincent Price would have meant delaying the start of the project, so Christopher Lee was contracted. It was just a week before the cameras were due to roll that Tigon changed their minds on Karloff, rather callously figuring that they’d have paid him whether he lived or died anyway. A smaller part was hastily written by associate producer Gerry Levy.

 

His new role in place, all the scenes involving Boris were shot first. It was by no means an easy shoot for the legend, however. Frail, ill, and confined to a wheelchair, the filming took place during several cold December nights. No matter how sad the image of the frail and actor is, he gave 100 percent and is as memorable and engaging as he ever was. Even opposite Christopher Lee (whom he’d worked with on Corridors of Blood in 1958), the star shone brightly, delivering his lines with his trademark beautiful lisping voice. A brilliant gag has his character raving about a vintage brandy, only for Mark Eden’s Robert Manning to down it as if it were water; leaving the academic scoffing at his young guest. Clearly a very proud man right to the end, Karloff actually insisted on walking in one scene (towards the end of the film), something that left him in intense pain and breathless. He was adamant that the audience didn’t only see him confined to his chair. The freezing shoot did get the better of him, however, and he was hospitalised for a while with a bad cold. He recovered, and returned to Hollywood, where he fulfilled his obligations of appearing in four low-budget Mexican horror films. He passed away in February 1969, a mere two months after Curse of the Crimson Altar’s UK release. The four Mexican movies were all released several years after the legend’s death and are a sorry way to remember the great man. As a more fitting swan song, Peter Bogdanovich’s superb Targets (1968) and Sewell’s Crimson Altar are better ways to remember the career of an actor who brought chills, thrills, and many smiles to the faces of his adoring public.

CURSE OF THE CRIMSON ALTAR is screening on HORROR CHANNEL.
Sky 319, Virgin 149, Freeview 70, Freesat 138.

Bitcoin Is Becoming an Intrinsic Part of the Gaming World

For anyone who’s into gaming and who hasn’t yet opened a bitcoin wallet, now could be the right time to do so. More and more games developers are now incorporating the digital currency, either within the playing experience or as a way to pay.

Play-to-win
bitcoin

One area
where it’s now as easy to play with bitcoin as any other currency is in casino
gaming. In the past couple of years, the growth of the bitcasino market has
been phenomenal. In the same way that you can have an online casino account
funded with fiat currencies, there are now lots of bitcasinos with the usual
gamut of casino games available. Many players choose bitcasinos as they are secure and accounts can be
anonymous – you only need to supply a username and email address and have a
bitcoin wallet you can fund your account with. An added advantage is that any
winnings cleared for withdrawal can be transferred back to your wallet
immediately, giving you the freedom to spend your profits elsewhere.

 Poker
Table
” (CC BY
2.0
) by slgckgc


It’s not just at bitcasinos where
bitcoins can be won, though. There’s one free-to-play geocaching game called
Takara,
where players both plant and hunt for bitcoin treasure – think Pokémon Go but
instead of looking for Pokémon, you’re on the lookout for bitcoins and
Counterparty tokens. The Counterparty tokens that can be collected in the game
can be used directly on the bitcoin blockchain, which means that the game’s
prizes will be valid to use outside the app. In this way, the game developers
are hoping that the influence of the digital currency will be increased.

Buy games with bitcoin

As well as games that involve the
winning of bitcoins, it’s now also possible to buy games with bitcoins. On the
Steam platform, and at Kinguin and G2A, there’s a now a
pay with bitcoin option. In addition, the No Man’s Sky website began accepting
direct bitcoin payments this August for pre-orders of the PC version of the new
exploration and survival game.


ESL Extreme Masters: Pro Gaming” (CC BY 2.0) by wuestenigel

A bitcoin-enabled gaming experience on the CEVO platform is
being developed through a partnership between Global eSports company, CEVO, and
Leet, a bitcoin-based gaming service, working together with Xapo, a bitcoin
debit card provider. CEVO users can already enter tournaments that have prize
money to play for and through the new partnership they will be able to boost
their bitcoin wallets when playing games and challenging their friends. Any
winnings can be withdrawn to a Xapo wallet and held as a bitcoin balance.

Already gamers can win and lose gambling games in bitcoins,
they can buy games in the digital currency and earn it in free-to-play games.
Perhaps professional gamers will soon be paid in bitcoin too. With bitcoin
crossing all kinds of gaming platforms and international borders, gamers’
playing funds will be able to jump from casinos and poker to console games and
treasure-hunt games like Takara. In the same way that email has all but
replaced the need for the old-fashioned postal system, it’s highly likely that
in a few years’ time many gaming transactions will be made with bitcoins and
gamers’ credit cards will be left gathering dust.

Play-to-win bitcoin