DRACULA UNTOLD

MOVIE REVIEW: DRACULA UNTOLD / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: GARY SHORE / SCREENPLAY: MATT SAZAMA, BURK SHARPLESS / STARRING: LUKE EVANS, DOMINIC COOPER, SARAH GADON, CHARLES DANCE / RELEASE DATE: OCTOBER 3RD

With the seemingly infinite variations of the Dracula mythos available in movies, TV, books, and comics what mysteries could possibly lurk in this latest retelling to warrant the label “Untold”?

Not many, as it turns out, however this self-assured remix of the original neck-biter combines elements of back story from the classic Bram Stoker’s Dracula, with those of his supposed inspiration; Vlad Tepes (aka “The Impaler”), with the added wrinkle that this Vlad had a much nobler purpose in mind when it comes to becoming a creature of the night.

In this version of the legend, Vlad, Prince of Transylvania, is a former child soldier, one of a thousand Transylvanian children stolen from their homes and pressed into the service of the all-conquering Turkish army. Having reluctantly earned his “Impaler” moniker fighting for the Turks, the Prince has since retired to tend to his family and people in peace, at least until the Turks come once again for the sons of Transylvania, including his own.

With no chance of defeating the Turkish hordes with his meagre army, Vlad is forced to turn to an unnatural presence in “Broken Tooth mountain” to strike up a Faustian bargain to protect his people.

The initial ludicrousness of casting Dracula as a hero and reluctant monster quickly wears off and ends up working beautifully, thanks to the handling of the story and Luke Evans (and Charles Dance’s) performances. As with so many other vampire stories before it, Dracula Untold appears to cherry pick the elements of the legend it wishes to use, leaving out many of the story’s more familiar components and seeming wholly revisionist, until a well known aspect suddenly crops up unexpectedly, usually accompanied by a grin of recognition on the audience’s faces. A non-spoiler example would be that Vlad’s wife is definitely not called Mina, and yet that name still manages to finagle its way into the story later on.

The other main twist in the tale is that Dracula’s vampirism has an older, darker origin; and while he has been blessed with all the strengths of a vampire to save his people, he has not yet doomed his soul and still has a chance to regain his humanity if he can resist a terrible temptation.

Evans sells this anguish well, dancing between moments of strength, darkness, hunger and fear of the very people he wishes to protect, lest they discover what he a has become. In a relatively minor role, Charles Dance funnels all the menace of Tywin Lannister from Game of Thrones into a much more sinister form, and Sarah Gadon, while initially weak as Vlad’s wife, is given much more to do in the later stages of the film.

Opposing Dracula as head of the Turkish army Dominic Cooper’s Mehmed II provides a worthy adversary, with enough care having gone into the script to give him the intelligence to come up a few effective ways to counteract the Prince’s new powers, rather than just be a one-note villain.

The rest of the supporting cast do not fare so well. Vlad’s compatriots are mostly made up of interchangeable beards (wise-beard, overly-protective-beard, dies-in-first-act-beard), and while the Turks are more distinguishable from each other visually, there is little character behind them. A blond, sneering, plaited henchman that recurs throughout the film is given little character past his name in the credits: “Bright Eyes”.

These are but minor quibbles, as adding more moments for these characters would have added to the films brisk 92 minutes, the perfect amount of time to dabble in the vampire playground, throw up a few surprises here and there and keep the audience from becoming bored.

A confident first feature from commercials director Gary Shore, he handles his story, actors and effects well although some fight scenes are a bit blurry in IMAX, but that is difficult to avoid. The inventiveness of the reveal of Dracula’s new powers also bodes well for future projects.

Dracula Untold does a far better job reinventing a classic villain as a hero than both the recent Maleficent and the plodding I, Frankenstein. The sequel hinted to at the end of the film, along with references to a “game” with another, as yet unrevealed, immortal will be most welcome if Shore and team can continue to reinvigorate legends in such an enjoyable way.

Expected Rating:  4 out of 10
Actual Rating:

THE MAN IN THE ORANGE JACKET

MOVIE REVIEW: THE MAN IN THE ORANGE JACKET (M. O. Zh.) / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: AIK KARAPETIAN / SCREENPLAY: AIK KARAPETIAN / STARRING: MAXIM LAZAREV, ANTA AIZUPE, ARIS ROZENTALS / RELEASE DATE: TBC

In terms of doing what it says on the tin, The Man in the Orange Jacket certainly offers at least one human male in the rather fetching attire of the title. In terms of putting Latvia on the map as a new home of cinematic horror, this is unfortunately not the film for that job.

When a wealthy industrialist leaves (in his own words) ‘some hundred families penniless’ by selling off one of his harbours, one former worker refuses to be laid off without a fight. Within the first fifteen minutes of this very short film, the titular man in the orange jacket has broken in to the aging capitalist’s house, engaged in a quick and brutal bit of stalk and slash and set himself up as the new owner of the luxury mansion. However, after disposing of the bodies of the old man and his much younger wife, our brightly coloured revolutionary slasher is haunted by paranoia as he attempts to enjoy the comforts of his newfound prosperity.

While The Man in the Orange Jacket starts out bleak and chilly, all autumnal colours and moody compositions, it soon descends into doppelganger daftness. Divided into four chapters, its pace is often glacial even though the film only runs to 71 minutes. It starts out promisingly, wasting no time in getting to some thrills in the pre-credits sequence, but it then settles in to watch the decomposition of its anti-hero’s mental state as he lounges around the doomed and gloomy mansion, watching television, eating fancy cuisine and ordering in a pair of prostitutes for company.

In its study of isolation and madness, it recalls The Shining at times, particularly when director Karapetian’s camera glides around the huge house with nothing but silence on the soundtrack. With little dialogue and only brief bursts of sudden violence, there is not a lot in the way of character development or action. Reality and fantasy collide, as the man in the orange jacket gets more comfortable in the suits, the seats, the car, and the swimming pool of the rich man from whom he has stolen it. His violent fantasies play out to opera and his nightmares become more dark and out of focus as his orange jacketed doppelganger stops watching from afar and starts to lurk ever closer to the mansion.

The economic context of all this is obvious. The sight of its working class anti-hero, hat pulled down over his face and orange jacket making him light up a like a dreaded beacon, is as terrifyingly iconic as Switchblade Romance’s similarly attired slasher. However, once he has dispatched his bourgeois foes, the menacing mood is tainted and impossible to sustain even for the short running time.

Technically, The Man in the Orange Jacket is an impressive debut from director Aik Karapetian. Story wise, it’s a shame there isn’t much more going on than that very literal title.
Expected Rating: 7 out of 10
Actual Rating:

SHARKTOPUS VS. PTERACUDA

MOVIE REVIEW: SHARKTOPUS VS. PTERACUDA / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: KEVIN O’NEILL / SCREENPLAY: MATT YAMSHITA / STARRING: ROBERT CARRADINE, KATIE SAVOY, RIBB HILLIS, MARIO CEARA / RELEASE DATE: TBC

Ho hum, another month, another monster shark movie. This time, we have what essentially is a Roger Corman version of Godzilla and Rodan Go Bananas meet Sharknado.

Mad scientist (aren’t they all?) Dr. Rico Symes (Carradine) crosses pterodactyl DNA with a barracuda creating a biogenetic monster that could be used as a bio-weapon. Of course, the creature escapes (security is always lax in these top secret labs) with the help of an evil, foreign secret agent (aren’t they all, too?) who gains control of the beast, but not before it terrorises the hammy extras throughout the film.

Meanwhile, at the Munoz Del Mar aquarium, biologist Lorena Christmas (Savoy) discovers a miniature Sharktopus that quickly grows, and – naturally – escapes. The two creatures know the sea is not big enough for the both of them, and a showdown takes place for supreme domination of the sea, devouring well-deserved bad actors along the way.

Even for this type of TV movie fodder, the CGI ranges from bad to laughable. O’Neill’s directing is flat and uninspiring. Yamashita’s script is weak, filled with bad scenes and even worse dialogue – which is a shame as he had promise with his earlier work on the far superior film Virtually Heroes.

There’s even a brief but bizarre cameo by talk show host Conan O’Brian, reportedly directed by producer Roger Corman himself, that seems out of place and tacked-on for filler or as a mere crowd pleaser.

Come the anti-climactic ending, you know – just like James Bond – Sharktopus will be back (Sharktopus vs. Mermantula is already in production). Like watching paint dry, we don’t think if we can stand the suspense.
Expected Rating: 5 out of 10
Actual Rating:

IN DARKNESS WE FALL

MOVIE REVIEW: IN DARKNESS WE FALL (LA CUEVA) / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: ALFREDO MONTERO / SCREENPLAY: JAVIER GULLÓN, ALFREDO MONTERO / STARRING: MARTA CASTELLOTE / XOEL FERNÁNDEZ, EVA GARCIA-VACAS / RELEASE DATE: TBC

In a deep, dark cave on a remote island off the coast of Spain, no can hear you scream. In Darkness We Fall has no aliens, no ghosts, no witches, and no pale freakish subterranean monsters. Instead, it has five friends desperate to find a way out of the darkness before dehydration and starvation put a tragic end to their camping holiday. With one character armed with a camera, this claustrophobic cave crawl takes the found footage concept to new depths.

Set on the idyllic island of Formentera, just a stone’s throw away from party-mad Ibiza, In Darkness We Fall sees the five friends having a holiday in paradise before it all goes horribly (as the ravers might say) Pete Tong. After camping in the middle of nowhere, drinking far too much, skinny dipping and shagging, the quintet finds a cave that leads them straight down into darkness. Dehydrated already from their previous night of heavy boozing, they set off to explore the cave on a whim, but soon find the excitement turning to terror. The hot, dangerous passageways are a labyrinth of muddy walls that appear to go on forever and the cave is covered with stalactites that stick out nastily. However, it quickly becomes clear that the adrenaline-pumped adventurers are hopelessly lost.

Their initial happy-go-lucky facades begin to crumble as pranks turn to panic, their food and water dries up and they realise they are doomed to die in the darkness of the cave. Desperate times call for desperate measures and soon the former friends find themselves turning more than the camera on each other in the depths of their very own personal hell.

The found footage format is proving decidedly hard to kill; with yet another effort that proves what an effective method of presenting horror it can be. Not since The Blair Witch Project has a group of people bickering their way to their eventual deaths seemed so frighteningly believable. Where Blair Witch had the never-ending woods and an unseen supernatural menace, In Darkness We Fall has a cave that is so completely impossible to get your bearings in; it makes the woods seem positively lit up with exit signs. This Spanish language effort also borrows liberally from , another classic of the found footage subgenre, with its characters depending on the camera’s night vision mode once the lights all go completely out for the nail-biting finale.

Though there is still the odd moment where audiences will be left slapping their heads and saying ‘why are you still filming this?’ the use of the camera becomes more and more essential as the film goes on. The speedy descent into madness of some characters is scarily convincing as dehydration and claustrophobia attacks the unfortunate group and simmering resentments rise. It starts out sunny and fun with the pranks being first amusing, then their attempts to survive seem quite smart, but finally their deterioration is shocking, saddening, and before too long, vicious. It’s anchored by solid performances and a near-unbearable final act that is over too quickly.

Tense, gripping and uncompromisingly claustrophobic, the experience is stifling and frequently disturbing. It may not break any new ground but In Darkness We Fall proves to anyone who thought the tape and the batteries had finally ran out of the found footage genre, that something really scary can still find its way into the light.

Expected Rating: 5 out of 10

Actual Rating:

THE EQUALIZER

MOVIE REVIEW: THE EQUALIZER / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: ANTOINE FUQUA / SCREENPLAY: RICHARD WENK / STARRING: DENZEL WASHINGTON, MARTON CSOKAS, CHLOË GRACE MORETZ, DAVID HARBOUR, BILL PULLMAN, MELISSA LEO / RELEASE DATE: SEPTEMBER 26th

Denzel Washington is on fire again. With him cast opposite a little girl, strutting smoothly away from mammoth explosions and taking down bad guys in all sorts of brutal ways, you’d be forgiven for thinking this is a belated sequel to Man on Fire. Only this time, Dakota Fanning has been replaced by a considerably older and worryingly sexualised Chloë Grace Moretz, all proper grown up now since those Kick-Ass flicks and now playing a Jodie Foster-alike teen prostitute who needs protection from Russian pimps.

The Equalizer sees Washington play the titular vigilante in an update of the ‘80s TV show. Washington’s Robert McCall is now considerably more vicious than Edward Woodward ever was, playing one of those typical ex-military guys who wakes before his alarm, keeps his hair rigorously cropped and polishes his shoes with a toothbrush each morning. He can’t sleep (probably due to his morally dubious past) so he reads in an all-night diner, where he meets Moretz’s troubled teen Teri. Dressed to impress her punters, she has dreams of becoming a singer but is stuck in a nasty situation with violent customers and an even nastier Russian pimp named Slavi. When Teri is beaten so badly that she ends up in intensive care, McCall refuses to sit by any longer and begins to use his severe skills to start exacting retribution on those he feels need help equalling the score.

Aptly for a reboot, the character and the story feel like absolutely nothing new here. The only surprises come a short way into the film when Moretz disappears after giving a mesmerising performance in the early scenes, and then Washington appears to dispatch all the bad guys at the end of the first act. Of course, there are bigger fish to fry for McCall, and Moretz’s untimely bow from the film is the catalyst for the rest of Washington’s rampage of revenge. Washington does this kind of cool, calm character while sleepwalking now and despite the odd spouting of clichés, both Washington and Moretz soar in their few emotive scenes together.

However, The Equalizer is, unsurprisingly, not really about emotion. Director Antoine Fuqua’s previous film Olympus Has Fallen was unfairly slated by many but had a joyous mix of brutal bloodletting and black humour. The Equalizer follows suit with some truly nasty villains; all tattooed dead-eyed psychopathic Russians with plenty of money but absolutely no heart. It’s lucky Denzel’s around with some seriously impressive skills to see to these pesky Russkies. And see to them he does. Fuqua relishes the violence with every kill gloriously brutal and satisfyingly gory. When you see the way these bad guys treat women, you will be lusting for the cathartic take downs that McCall delivers to his victims. Most excitingly, it all leads up to a hardcore version of Home Alone in a hardware store which gives a whole new meaning to the phrase DIY.

While Fuqua goes a little heavy on the Washington worship, (watch in awe as he walks away from an explosion or drips menacingly under some sprinklers) The Equalizer is undoubtedly a thrilling character to watch. With his impressive skill set, he never really appears to be in danger so it is unfortunately left to all the female characters (read: prostitutes) to suffer at the hands of the villains. Hit Girl gets hit and then gets her ass seriously kicked, and the fate of any other prostitutes in the movie becomes despairingly inevitable. Washington has fun with his charismatic vigilante but the brooding score, and frequent literary references (McCall is a big reader) attempt to make you take The Equalizer more seriously than your average action thriller. After taking on corrupt cops and seemingly the entire Russian mob without seeming to break much of a sweat, it will be interesting to see if a sequel can find a villain who will truly be the equal of Washington’s Equalizer.

Expected rating: 6 out of 10

Actual Rating:

THE MAZE RUNNER

MOVIE REVIEW: THE MAZE RUNNER / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: WES BALL / SCREENPLAY: NOAH OPPENHEIM, GRANT PIERCE MYERS, T.S. NOWLIN / STARRING: DYLAN O’BRIEN, AML AMEEN, KI HONG LEE, BLAKE COOPER, THOMAS BRODIE-SANGSTER, WILL POULTER / RELEASE DATE: OCTOBER 10TH

The latest aspirant to the Young Adult throne currently occupied by The Hunger Games, (after Twilight‘s abdication), the film adaptation of James Dashner’s The Maze Runner ditches the now seemingly obligatory love triangle and replaces it with a heavy dose of mystery, focusing on a group of boys trapped in an agrarian glade at the heart of a harsh and inhospitable maze. The film closely follows Thomas (Teen Wolf‘s Dylan O’Brien), the latest amnesiac arrival in the community, who like the other boys remembers only his name, as he and the audience are thrust into a new and confusing world. As he acclimatises to his situation, the rules are slowly explained: the glade has received fresh recruits and some minor supplies once a month for the past three years; no one is permitted to enter the maze except the “Runners”; the runners map the maze, trying to find a way out; the maze is different every day, reconfiguring itself at night; the runners must return by sundown each day before the door to the maze closes; there is something (or many somethings) in the maze at night; no one has ever survived a night in the maze. But as Thomas gets used to his surroundings and its inhabitants, he discovers that even within the glade, all is not as it seems.

The Maze Runner manages to move along at a fair pace, never spending too long dwelling on its secrets before introducing an unexpected action scene or building up its cast of characters, a mix of relatively unknown actors alongside some familiar faces such as Poulter (Lee Carter from Son of Rambow) and Brodie-Sangster (Jojen Reed in Game of Thrones).

Unlike many other films based around a central mystery, the final reveal is interesting enough that it doesn’t come as an anticlimax, and the hints handed out along the way should ensure that the audience’s own theories will be in the right area. The film is, however, let down by a strange reluctance to deal with the grittier elements of its premise and is ultimately derailed by a final act that concentrates far too much on setting up potential sequels.

One of the strengths of The Hunger Games was that it dealt honestly with the brutality of its core concept, horrifically slaughtering cherubic children in the opening seconds of the first Games portrayed in the series. The Maze Runner, on the other hand, tends to shy away from such moments. Yes, the boys do have to handle one of their own gone rogue, but it’s dealt with in a way that absolves them of any real responsibility. Apart from a minor scene where Thomas is sent to get “fertiliser”, there’s also no acknowledgement of how hard it would be for a community made up of teen and pre-teen boys to survive on their own. Food and shelter seems plentiful. Hard times are mentioned, but never really elaborated on. Even the “The Pit”, the boys’ version of solitary confinement, looks rather cosy.

Whatever character conflicts do occur, they are nothing along the lines of the Lord of the Flies tribalism that you would expect from a bunch of stranded young men. All the most interesting character interactions seems to have occurred before Thomas’ arrival, helpfully freeing him up to nose around and upset the status quo, but at the cost of leaving the other actors with little to do. Overall, The Hunger Games need not worry too much about watching its back.

Expected Rating: 8 out of 10

Actual Rating:

THE SIGNAL

MOVIE REVIEW: THE SIGNAL / CERT:15 / DIRECTOR: WILLIAM EUBANK / SCREENPLAY: CARLYLE EUBANK, WILLIAM EUBANK, DAVID FRIGERIO / STARRING: BRENTON THWAITES, OLIVIA COOKE, BEAU KNAPP, LAURENCE FISHBURNE, LIN SHAYE / RELEASE DATE: TBA

While escorting his girlfriend Haley (Cooke) cross country to Caltech, Nic (Thwaites), along with his friend Jonah (Knapp), decide to track down a pesky hacker, Nomad, who has been bothering them of late – even managing to seize control of Haley’s webcam. Once they reach the hacker’s supposed lair however, things take a turn into Blair Witch territory, with the film switching from a realistic tone to an eerie mix of night vision and hand-held shots to freak out the audience before various incomprehensible things occur. Nic awakens in what seems to be a government facility and struggles to find out what happened to him, where his friends are, why everyone is wearing biohazard suits and what’s with the oddly monotonous mannerisms of Laurence Fishburne, who keeps asking where Nic first encountered “The Signal”?

What follows next is a gradual build of interrogations, secret plotting and slow burn reveals as Nic tries to locate his friends, escape the facility and find out what the hell is going on.

Despite its initial lo-fi vibe, The Signal nicely sustains suspense and tension, skipping genres from buddy road trip to romantic drama to horror/sci-fi spookiness, all the while brewing up some central mysteries for our smart, MIT-attending protagonist to figure out. Once what has happened is finally divulged (but not why it was done or by whom), the film changes gear and stages some impressive slo-mo scenes that artfully convey jeopardy without turning the film into an out and out action/adventure film.

Unfortunately, the final reveal falls somewhat flat; it’s not that the explanation for everything that has gone before is a disappointment, more that the way it is handled is slightly underwhelming, failing to leave the audience with some memorable imagery to reflect on, or to prime them for a bigger budget sequel. For this reason, The Signal doesn’t quite live up to its Twilight Zone pretensions – it’s more akin to a middling Outer Limits episode.

Expected Rating: 7 out of 10

Actual Rating:

AS ABOVE, SO BELOW

MOVIE REVIEW: AS ABOVE, SO BELOW / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: JOHN ERICK DOWDLE / SCREENPLAY: DREW DOWDLE, JOHN ERICK DOWDLE / STARRING: PERDITA WEEKS, BEN FELDMAN, EDWIN HODGE, FRANÇOIS CIVIL / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

As Above, So Below takes us deep below the cosmopolitan streets of Paris, down to the mysterious, shadowy network of caverns and catacombs which crisscross beneath the city, home to the bony remains of six million luckless souls. Brainbox alchemy student Scarlett Marlowe (Weeks) leads a team of fearless (and fearful) explorers down into the tombs in search of the mythical ‘Philosopher’s Stone’ which can turn base metal into gold and grant eternal life. Inevitably, they find themselves trapped and lost in the subterranean tunnels and, just to make matters worse, things start to get a bit supernatural. Luckily, they have fantastic HD cameras set into their head-torches so they can record everything that happens in pinpoint graphic detail…

Yes, we’re in ‘found footage’ territory again – although for once there’s no flimsy narrative conceit attempting to convince us that what we’re watching is ‘based on  real events’ and all that’s left of our brave heroes is their cameras and the footage they’ve all been assiduously recording. As Above, So Below is a cut above many straight-to-DVD ‘found footage’ efforts purely by virtue of the fact that it is, at least, trying to do something a little bit different. In places it manages to evoke an uncomfortable sense of claustrophobia as Scarlett and her gang squeeze through tight rock crevasses, wade through narrow water-logged tunnels and find themselves apparently trapped in sealed chambers. Quick, someone open a window…

But where the film manages to play on our fear of confined spaces and airless rooms it’s less successful in generating horror heebeegeebees. Frantic shaky cam makes it hard to work out who’s who and what’s what and the concept of the catacombs recreating terrors and traumas from the gang’s past doesn’t amount to much more than a ringing telephone and a clunking piano. Desperate to up the scare factor, the last act turns into a fairground haunted house runaround. Scarlett and co are dashing through the tunnels which suddenly go mental; white-faced robed figures wander by, faces loom out of the walls and the air is suddenly full of disembodied wailing voices chorusing ‘woooooh’. We wouldn’t have been too surprised to see a couple of extras with white sheets draped over them loom out of the shadows as a plastic spider hanging on a wire drops from the ceiling. A quick cameo from Dracula and Frankenstein’s monster would have rounded things off nicely…

In truth As Above isn’t that bad but it does go wildly off the rails in its rush for the exit. There are some good ideas here and there in amongst the hokum but the needs of the ‘found footage’ gimmick inevitably leads to too much unfocused running about and screaming at nothing very frightening and not enough time spent generating any real tension or full-blooded scares.

Expected rating: 6 out of 10

Actual rating:

THE BOXTROLLS

MOVIE REVIEW: THE BOXTROLLS / CERT: PG / DIRECTOR: GRAHAM ANNABLE, ANTHONY STACCHI / SCREENPLAY: IRENA BRIGNULL, ADAM PAVA / STARRING: BEN KINGSLEY, ISAAC HEMPSTEAD-WRIGHT, ELLE FANNING, JARED HARRIS, NICK FROST, RICHARD AYOADE, DEE BRADLEY BAKER, STEVE BLUM, SIMON PEGG / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

You have to feel sorry for poor old trolls. If upstart wizards aren’t dispatching them in Hogwarts bathrooms, they are being outsmarted in Middle-earth by a hobbit or used as arrow bait by Legolas. Trolls’ appearances in films have ranged from the cute singers in Frozen to the animalistic creatures in the absolutely fantastic Troll Hunter, but LAIKA animation has aimed for a mixture of the two in their newest stop-motion/CG/3D hybrid. The Boxtrolls is a film that gives you a reasonably straightforward story of weird being wonderful but there is far more going on behind the boxes than meets the eye.

The town of Cheesebridge (ruled by white hat-wearing, cheese-tasting toffs) is ravaged at night by the sinister Boxtrolls, underground-dwelling, box-wearing scavengers who terrify the townsfolk. But when they steal a baby, the nefarious Archibald Snatcher (voiced wonderfully by Ben Kingsley) sets out on a long-term mission to exterminate the Boxtrolls. However, years later Whitehat leader Lord Portley-Rind’s (Harris) daughter Winnie (Fanning) meets a young boy who lives with the trolls called Eggs (Hempstead-Wright) and is forced to rethink just how sinister these Boxtrolls really are and just what Snatcher is really up to.

LAIKA aren’t known for offering sub-par efforts, their last two films – Coraline and Paranorman – being visual and narrative wonders, but The Boxtrolls is the studio’s most enjoyable yet. It’s bound to divide audiences, with many likely to be a bit put off by some gross, dark imagery and intense moments, but it’s also a cracking little family film, one that offers a rather affirming message of not excluding those that are different, as well as boasting some successful slapstick and yuck moments for kids and an equally wide world of discovery for adults, with the plot’s ambitious reflections on the iniquities of the financial sector.

The animation is simply wonderful, blending stop-motion and moments of CG with grace and ease, making for a never less than impressive and full on-screen world. The film’s clockwork precision makes it as charming as a little music box. The Boxtrolls themselves are splendidly rendered and given strong characteristics despite their dialogue consisting of baby-like talk and grunts (provided mostly by Dee Bradley Baker and Steve Blum). Brignull and Pava’s screenplay does real justice to the source material, Alan Snow’s children’s novel Here be Monsters!.

Eggs (named for the label on his box) and Winnie are charming little outcast leads, the most accepting and open humans on display in the film. The Boxtrolls suggests that the real monsters are our preconceptions about others, and also those who abuse authority (a powerfully relevant notion for a kids’ film). And to that end the antagonist, Archibald Snatcher, is a truly show-stealing creation. Heinous both morally and visually,this Dickensian cross-dressing (yes you read right) villain is lent a seething arrogance by the almost unrecognisable vocals of the ever-brilliant Kingsley. In fact, everyone in the stacked cast (you won’t believe some of the voices that were involved, come the brilliantly picturesque end credits) likewise makes their characters stand out in some way or another.

This is a film which delightfully bubbles with emotion, scares, humour and character, and while a mixed reception inevitably awaits – it has to be noted how strong it is for youngsters – a film with so much on offer deserves praise. It seems that early responses have been mixed simply because it’s a bit… okay, a lot weird. Well, we say thank God for people like the folks at LAIKA, who not only make oddness appealing, but irresistible. The Boxtrolls just might be LAIKA’s best yet, a low-fi animated belter in a year where animation (How To Train Your Dragon 2 aside) has been tepid. You’ll want to box it and label it precious.

Expected Rating: 8 out of 10

Actual Rating:

FILMED IN SUPERMARIONATION

MOVIE REVIEW: FILMED IN SUPERMARIONATION / CERT: PG / DIRECTOR: STEPHEN LA RIVIERE / SCREENPLAY: STEPHEN LA RIVIERE, ANDREW T. SMITH / STARRING: GERRY ANDERSON, SYLVIA ANDERSON, JAMIE ANDERSON / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

This Christmas will see the second anniversary of the death of the astonishing Gerry Anderson, creator of a string of wonderfully inventive, timeless adventure series for children of all ages which pretty much defined the TV experience in the 1960s. The shows are nearly all iconic – Fireball XL5, Stingray, Thunderbirds, Captain Scarlet and the Mysterons – and they all starred sophisticated puppets brought to life by a technique Gerry himself christened ‘Supermarionation’. Stephen La Riviere’s wonderful, poignant and impressively thorough documentary Filmed in Supermarionation is the story of how it all began… and how it all ended…

In truth it’s a story most Anderson fans will be more than familiar with. But any story is only as good as its telling and Filmed in Supermarionation is the definitive account of the glory days of AP Films, Century 21 Productions and a fantasy factory working out of an unassuming unit in Slough’s dour industrial estate. Spines will tingle as Lady Penelope and Parker are brought back to life – voiced, as ever, by Gerry’s ex-wife Sylvia and voice artist and legend David Graham – recounting the story of Gerry’s genius from the comfort of an astonishingly faithful recreation of Jeff Tracy’s International Rescue base from Thunderbirds. For the next two hours no stone is left unturned as we journey from the early days of AP Films, with Gerry and his hungry and ambitious team taking their first faltering steps in the world of TV production. Approached by the formidable Roberta Leigh to produce a children’s adventure series, Gerry, who appears in archive footage throughout the film, recalls how he “nearly vomited on the floor” when he realised he was expected to make Twizzle with puppets and models.

But from tiny acorns grew a formidable empire as Gerry’s ferocious imagination created a succession of unforgettable, iconic children’s adventure series, each show growing in scale, scope and confidence. Filmed in Supermarionation brings together many of the people who, alongside Gerry, made it all happen. Gerry’s son Jamie takes some of the surviving puppeteers back to Islet Park in Maidenhead, the austere mansion home of Gerry’s very earliest productions and, later, the Ipswich Road studios in the Slough Trading Estate where the more ambitious shows were made. Elsewhere other familiar names and faces turn up to share their memories of very special times, including Nicholas Parsons (voice of Tex Tucker in Four Feather Falls), Anderson regular Shane Rimmer, Elizabeth Morgan (voice of Captain Scarlet’s high-flying ‘Angels‘) and a rare sighting of Robert Easton who provided the distinctive voice of Phones in Stingray.

Backroom boys including Brian Johnson, Alan Pattillo, Desmond Saunders, Alan Perry, Mike Trim – familiar names to anyone who’s ever studied the credits of any of Gerry’s shows – are on hand, all united in their opinion that Gerry was an “absolute visionary” who made the Century 21 phenomenon possible and who fought to make each of his shows bigger and better than the one which preceded it. But the film isn’t afraid to touch on Gerry’s less successful projects; the unexpected failure of the first Thunderbirds feature film (the forgettable second attempt, Thunderbird Six, is quickly glossed over) and the disastrous Secret Service which pretty much brought about the end of the Century 21 era.

Ultimately, it was the dawn of the new decade which brought down the curtain on Gerry’s production empire. Tastes were changing, puppets were out of fashion and, in any event, Gerry was keen to move into live action production… but that’s another story. Tales of the closing down of the Slough facility and the wholesale trashing of years of accumulated props, puppets and costumes created by Gerry and his team are genuinely heartbreaking, and not only to those who have to live it all again here for the camera.

Anderson fans keen to hear about the likes of UFO and Space:1999 and Gerry’s later efforts such as Terrahawks and Space Precinct may be disappointed, but the clue’s in the title. This is all about those wonderful Supermarionation years, classic shows where “anything can happen in the next half-hour” (and frequently did). It’s a tale told with genuine love and affection and with plenty of never-before-seen behind-the-scenes material, footage of Gerry and Sylvia on a ‘fact-finding’ visit to the States, a BBC TV documentary interviewing Sylvia and, astonishingly, the original Pathé news film story reporting on the German mining disaster which inspired Gerry to create International Rescue and Thunderbirds in 1964.

Filmed in Supermarionation is a remarkable achievement, a brilliantly considered and scrupulously researched love-letter to the work of one of the greatest innovators and storytellers of the television age. It can’t be recommended highly enough and it’s absolutely unmissable, not only for Gerry’s legion of fans and admirers but for anyone who remembers or is fascinated by the glory days of British TV and one of its most exemplary and important pioneers. Filmed in Supermarionation is, to coin a well-worn but unavoidably apt phrase, nothing less than FAB.

Expected Rating: 8 out of 10

Actual Rating: