RECKLESS (BLOEDLINK)

PrintE-mail Written by Ryan Pollard

One day, two ex-cons kidnap a millionaire's daughter, bound her to a bed in a sound-insulated vacant apartment and holds her up for ransom or else she dies. As the clock ticks, Laura discovers that she may have a relationship with one of the kidnappers that she never expected and that the two men hold a secret that one could not have expected. Sounds strangely similar to The Disappearance of Alice Creed, doesn’t it? Well in fact, not only is Reckless’ narrative similar to Alice Creed’s, it’s pretty much an exact shot-for-shot, almost word-for-word remake with the only difference being that it’s all in Dutch instead of English. It’s like as if the film was styled and crafted by déjà vu.

It’s almost an inverse to the ever-growing problem of English-language remakes of foreign-language films, like Let the Right One In/Let Me In and both versions of Michael Haneke’s Funny Games. What we have here is something that is dangerously similar to Gus Van Sant’s remake of Psycho, with everything being copied and pasted from Alice Creed, but lacking the edge, soul, wit and integrity of the original. Everything right about Reckless is so closely copied from Alice Creed as to suggest that the makers of this version understand the original well enough to know exactly why they shouldn’t have remade it in the first place. It’s not that this remake is terrible, it’s that it’s incredibly baffling why this redundant remake even existed in the first place.

The fact of the matter is simply this: The Disappearance of Alice Creed did not need to be remade, and if you had made Alice Creed as well as it was, why bother doing it all again? It’s annoying, inexcusable and there’s absolutely no reason for it. Alice Creed was a perfectly stripped-down, three-handed thriller that was shot almost entirely on a single-location set, and even though it was tough and uncomfortable at times, it had a solidly smart script, incredibly strong performances, made the most of its limited resources, and reaped the benefits of fat-free filmmaking. When remaking a film, you have to do something that is both surprising and special in order to have the remake justified, but in the case of this, it isn’t justified at all. It just ends becoming pointless to watch, lacking the bite Alice Creed definitely had, and ends up being oddly toothless, reminding you just how fantastic the original was when it came out back in 2010.

In the end, Reckless is once again another classic example of a pointlessly redundant remake of a great film that didn’t need to be remade in the first place, and leaves you wondering why the hell it was remade shot-for-shot in the first place. Plus, if you are one of those people who loved The Disappearance of Alice Creed when it came out, that’s great, but if you are even remotely interested in seeing the remake, then why?

INFO: RECKLESS (BLOEDLINK) / CERT: TBC / DIRECTOR: JORAM LURSEN / SCREENPLAY: FRANK KETELAAR / STARRING: TYGO GERNANDT, MARWAN KENZARI, SARAH CHRONIS / RELEASE DATES: TBC

Expected Rating: 7 out of 10

Actual Rating:
 


Suggested Articles:
Breaking news: it turns out you probably shouldn't believe everything Nigel Farage tells you. Far f
Whether or not you’re a fan of young Daniel Radcliffe – and there are some here at STARBURST HQ
You've all seen supernatural forces terrorise families in countless horror films down the years bu
The remake or reimagining in this case of two classic films, the Seven Samurai and the original Magn
scroll back to top

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Other articles in Movie Reviews

DOWN UNDER 27 September 2016

SWISS ARMY MAN 27 September 2016

UNDER THE SHADOW 26 September 2016

THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN 23 September 2016

VAMPIRE RESURRECTION 21 September 2016

CLOWNTOWN 21 September 2016

31 20 September 2016

THE GIRL WITH ALL THE GIFTS 19 September 2016

SULLY 19 September 2016

ALOYS 18 September 2016

- Entire Category -

Sign up today!
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner