VAMPIRES

PrintE-mail Written by Paul Mount

Richard Johnstone’s micro-budget British horror movie, retitled from the slightly more subtle Bloodless, sees a quintet of young couples (all supposed to be the same age although one or two look distinctly more mature than the others) rock up at a spooky old ‘castle’ (although it’s really more of a sprawling country pile) as volunteers in experimental medical trials. If they can last the thirty-day trial period they’ll get a tasty £20,000 per couple as ‘prize money’ for their trouble. But naturally all is not as it seems in their rural seclusion where they are cut off from the outside world (they even have to surrender their mobile phones - shriek!) and the mysterious ‘team’ conducting the experiments aren’t quite who they seem. They’re vampires; don’t start screaming ‘Oi, spoilers!’... did you catch the film’s title?

At first blush it seems as if Vampires hasn’t got much going for it we’ve not seen a zillion times before. Mismatched kids trapped in middle of nowhere – check; eerie strangers watching and manipulating – check; things going bump and arrgh in the night – check. Yet despite its story shortcomings – we can pretty much guess the way it’s going to play out the moment the kids step nervously out of the van that’s brought them to the ‘castle’ – Vampires is oddly agreeable and surprisingly accomplished for a film starring no-one of note and undoubtedly put together for not much more than pocket money. Johnstone’s script is light on its feet, its characters better sketched than many of the cyphers who populate generic horror fare (if rarely especially more likeable) and he makes superb use of the semi-dilapidated location and the autumnal English countryside surroundings, all grey skies, squelching mud and squawking crows. The vampires, when they are finally revealed, are a suitably gruesome bunch too; the use of roaring lion sound FX as they hunt and kill gives them a pleasingly animalistic – and mercifully un-Twilight – demeanour and encounters with a beguiling child vampire are genuinely creepy and disconcerting thanks to an effecting performance from young Holly Louise Newton.

Vampires doesn’t reinvent the subgenre but then it’s not trying to. It does, however, succeed in giving the undead their bite back after years of touchy-feely teen twaddle and for that alone Johnstone, a promising talent with a real feel for his subject matter, deserves considerable kudos. Our sincere fangs, in fact... (Ouch – Ed).

Special Features: Making of / Cast and crew interviews

VAMPIRES / CERT: 15/ DIRECTOR & SCREENPLAY: RICHARD JOHNSTONE / STARRING: BILL FELLOWS, VICTORIA HOPKINS, ANGELA ZAHRA, MELISSA ADVANI, JUDITH ALEXANDER, KRISTIAN JAMES / RELEASE DATE: OUT NOW

 


Suggested Articles:
Long before Robert Downey Jr. or Benedict Cumberbatch ever portrayed Sherlock Holmes on our screens
Polish writer/director Walerian Borowczyk was quite the card. In a 40-year career (he died in 2006),
Getting a new release from the BFI following their recent Scorsese celebration, Alice Doesn’t Live
Make no mistake, this isn’t competing with the likes of The Abyss or Das Boot, either for expansiv
scroll back to top

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Other articles in DVD / Blu-ray Reviews

SHERLOCK HOLMES: THE COMPLETE COLLECTION 22 March 2017

THE STORY OF SIN 20 March 2017

ALICE DOESN’T LIVE HERE ANYMORE 20 March 2017

THE CHAMBER 20 March 2017

THE WARTIME CHRONICLES 20 March 2017

PIECES 18 March 2017

SOLARIS 18 March 2017

WHO'S THAT KNOCKING AT MY DOOR 18 March 2017

THE DOCTORS: THE JON PERTWEE YEARS 17 March 2017

FRIGHT NIGHT 14 March 2017

- Entire Category -

Sign up today!
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner