SWORD OF VENGEANCE

PrintE-mail Written by Fred McNamara

SWORD OF VENGEANCE

Sword of Vengeance’s preference for putting style over substance isn’t its biggest problem. Rather, its style is so unoriginal, bleak and drab that if you plan on watching this film for enjoyment, you’d be better off revisiting that Game of Thrones episode. A film that puts all its staying power on how it looks isn’t always a bad thing, especially if those visuals turn out to be the film’s strongest element. But in Sword of Vengeance, none of these elements come together in a worthwhile package, which is a shame because Sword of Vengeance has everything it needs to be a hells-bells thrills-for-all action romp.

Sword of Vengeance is a Viking action film about a mysterious outsider who, on his mission for vengeance (see what they did there?) against a ruthless Lord, becomes entangled in the affairs of a group of warriors keen on overthrowing the Lord’s corrupt and brutal kingdom in an attempt to restore order and peace to their world. Subplot? Intrigue? Three dimensions? Jog on.

There’s definitely a feeling that director Jim Weedon defiantly chose to shoot Sword of Vengeance with as much visual charge as possible, and in doing do pretty much left everything else by the sidelines. The plot is somewhat shallow, the characters clichéd and campy, and the acting is downright hammy. But the visuals? If you can get past all the throat-slitting and stomach-gutting, they’re actually arresting enough to sustain some interest.

Weedon seems to have a knack for pulling plastic emotion out of his cast; what little conviction of character the cast can exude, Weedon snatches what he can from them and rams it down your throats with as much sharpness as lead Stanley Webber’s sword. Weedon also demonstrates he’s got some capability of piecing together some hooky action sequences, but again, because of Sword of Vengeance’s lack of everything apart from bloody thrills, all those gory fight scenes must be thinking “oh crud, we’re all this movie’s got – let’s turn it up to eleven!”

But without an engaging plot or characters that have a bit of spark to them, those many, many fisticuffs moments are rather hollow. If you like your movies with nothing but action, some more action, and a little bit more action thrown in, then Sword of Vengeance is to be recommended. But with barely anything to hook the viewer in for the long run, you’d be better off dusting off that copy of Battle Los Angeles and giving that another try. All in all, Sword of Vengeance has a lot of drive, but ends up careering in all the wrong directions.

Special Features: None

INFO: SWORD OF VENGEANCE / CERT: 15 / DIRECTOR: JIM WEEDON / SCREENPLAY: JULIAN UNTHANK / STARRING: STANLEY WEBER, EDWARD AKROUT, MISA BERIC, PETER J. CHAFFEY / RELEASE DATE: JUNE 1ST



Suggested Articles:
When it was originally released theatrically in 2010, Noah Baumbach’s Greenberg seemingly was a st
Three prostitutes are found murdered in the exact same way over consecutive nights across three coun
Between 1974 and 1981, Agatha Christie appeared to be everywhere on the big-screen, with no fewer th
Here’s a twist: a film shot on an iPhone about making a sequel to a film shot on an iPhone. James
scroll back to top

Add comment

Security code
Refresh

Other articles in DVD / Blu-ray Reviews

GREENBERG 26 February 2017

THE TEAM 24 February 2017

THE AGATHA CHRISTIE MOVIE COLLECTION 24 February 2017

2 JENNIFER 23 February 2017

DRAMATICAL MURDER 23 February 2017

LOVE, CHUNIBYO, AND OTHER DELUSIONS 23 February 2017

A MAN FOR ALL SEASONS 23 February 2017

JUSTICE LEAGUE DARK 21 February 2017

THE CRYING GAME 19 February 2017

THE MINDY PROJECT SEASON 4 15 February 2017

- Entire Category -

Sign up today!
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner

      
      
 
 
 
...